100% tevredenheidsgarantie Direct beschikbaar na je betaling Lees online óf als PDF Geen vaste maandelijkse kosten
logo-home
AICP Exam Prep 3.0 Frequently Most Tested Questions and Verified Accurate Answers €17,67
In winkelwagen

Tentamen (uitwerkingen)

AICP Exam Prep 3.0 Frequently Most Tested Questions and Verified Accurate Answers

 0 keer verkocht
  • Vak
  • AICP
  • Instelling
  • AICP

19. The New York Court of Appeals case Golden v. Planning Board of Town of Ramapo (1972) resulted in an important decision in what area? a. Exclusionary housing b. Growth management c. "Takings" claims d. Environmental justice B. Ramapo, NY established a growth management system that awarde...

[Meer zien]

Voorbeeld 4 van de 88  pagina's

  • 19 november 2024
  • 88
  • 2024/2025
  • Tentamen (uitwerkingen)
  • Vragen en antwoorden
  • AICP
  • AICP
avatar-seller
TestTrackers: Unlock Your Exam Potential | Quality Practice Materials | Boost Your Confidence Today!



AICP Exam Prep 3.0 Frequently Most
Tested Questions and Verified Accurate
Answers
19. The New York Court of Appeals case Golden v. Planning Board of Town of Ramapo

(1972) resulted in an important decision in what area?

a. Exclusionary housing

b. Growth management

c. "Takings" claims

d. Environmental justice

✓ B. Ramapo, NY established a growth management system that awarded points to
development proposals based on the availability of public utilities, drainage facilities,
parks, road access, and firehouses.



1. The Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 required local governments to address potential

hazards in a Hazard Mitigation Plan in order to remain eligible to receive certain federal

funds before and following federally-declared disasters. Your community has integrated such

a plan into the General Plan. Now the Safety Element of the General Plan is expanded to

cover the following: I. Natural hazards II. Man-made hazards III. Fiscal responsibility for

disasters IV. A development retreat from low-lying coastal areas

a. II & III

b. I, II, & IV

c. I & IV

d. I, II, III, & IV

|
✓ Thank You for Choosing Us! ✓ Resources & Updates: [Testtrackers - Stuvia US]
✓ © 2024 TestTrackers ✓ Your Success is Our Mission!
✓ Customer Support: [+254707240657]

, TestTrackers: Unlock Your Exam Potential | Quality Practice Materials | Boost Your Confidence Today!


✓ B. FEMA HMA of 2000 seeks to expand pre-disaster planning to precipitate the
widespread loss of life, damage to property, infrastructure and the environment. The Act
does not assign any fiscal responsibilities of disasters to any entity. Most local Safety
Element covers also man-made hazards. However, local jurisdictions are not burdened
with the fiscal impact associated with disasters.



2. In the United States, the "Neighborhood Unit" concept is attributed to:

a. Kevin Lynch

b. Clarence Perry

c. Ian McHarg

d. Lewis Mumford

✓ B. Clarence Perry lived in Forest Hills Gardens in Queens, NY and published an essay on
the concept of the neighborhood unit in 1929. Forest Hill Gardens, developed by
Frederick Law Olmsted, Jr. in 1911, inspired the neighborhood unit concept. Perry
defined a neighborhood as a self-contained area within a 5-minute walking radius,
bounded by major streets with shops at the intersections and a school in the middle. Kevin
Lynch wrote Image of the City in 1960. Ian McHarg wrote Design with Nature in 1969.
Lewis Mumford wrote Culture of Cities in 1929.



3. Which of the following court cases is/are concerned with takings? I. Nollan v. California

Coastal Commission (1987) II. Associated Homebuilders v. City of Livermore (1976) III. First

English Evangelical Lutheran Church v. County of Los Angeles (1987) IV. Lucas v. South

Carolina Coastal Council (1992)

a. I only

b. I & II



|
✓ Thank You for Choosing Us! ✓ Resources & Updates: [Testtrackers - Stuvia US]
✓ © 2024 TestTrackers ✓ Your Success is Our Mission!
✓ Customer Support: [+254707240657]

, TestTrackers: Unlock Your Exam Potential | Quality Practice Materials | Boost Your Confidence Today!


c. I & III

d. I, III, & IV

✓ D. In Nollan v. California Coastal Commission (1987), the state claimed that the Nollan's
proposed house would interfere with visual and psychological access to the public beach.
The state said that the Nollan's would be granted a building permit only if they allowed
public access to the beach. The court said this was a taking because if the state wanted to
provide access to the beach it should use the power of eminent domain and compensate
the land owners. In First English (1987), a church had not been allowed to use its
property temporarily because it had been flooded; the court said that the city must
provide compensation for this taking, even though it was only temporary. In Lucas, the
court found that a South Carolina state law which prohibited Lucas from building on two
lots on a barrier island was a taking because it deprived Lucas of all economically viable
use of the property. The Associated Homebuilders v. City of Livermore (1976) case was
about growth management. In that case, the court said it was permissible to phase growth
to allow for relief of overcrowded schools and sewer treatment facilities and to increase
water reserves.



4. Ebenezer Howard is best known for promoting self-sufficient towns with mixed economies

known as:

a. New towns

b. Planned unit developments

c. Garden cities

d. Suburbs




|
✓ Thank You for Choosing Us! ✓ Resources & Updates: [Testtrackers - Stuvia US]
✓ © 2024 TestTrackers ✓ Your Success is Our Mission!
✓ Customer Support: [+254707240657]

, TestTrackers: Unlock Your Exam Potential | Quality Practice Materials | Boost Your Confidence Today!


✓ C. Ebenezer Howard, (1850-1920) published Tomorrow: A Peaceful Path to Real Reform
in 1898; it was reissued as Garden Cities of Tomorrow in 1902. A garden city included
about 6,000 acres of land and was surrounded with a rural belt. The first garden cities
were in England: Letchworth in 1903 and Welwyn Garden in 1919. New Towns are a
successor to garden cities. The New Towns of Columbia, MD and Reston, VA were built in
the United States after World War II. A Planned Unit Development or PUD is planned
and developed as a single entity containing residential and non-residential development
such as public, commercial or industrial areas. PUDs allow for greater flexibility in
locating buildings, combining land uses, and including open space than traditional
development patterns. Suburban developments are located on the periphery of urban
areas and are not associated with Ebenezer Howard. Riverside, IL is considered the
earliest example of suburban development. Riverside is located outside of Chicago and
was developed in 1868 by Frederick Law Olmsted, Sr.



5. Which of the following is a landmark housing case?

a. Hadacheck v. Sebastian (1915)

b. Berman v. Parker (1954):

c. Southern Burlington NAACP v. Township of Mt. Laurel (1975)

d. Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co. (1926)




|
✓ Thank You for Choosing Us! ✓ Resources & Updates: [Testtrackers - Stuvia US]
✓ © 2024 TestTrackers ✓ Your Success is Our Mission!
✓ Customer Support: [+254707240657]

Dit zijn jouw voordelen als je samenvattingen koopt bij Stuvia:

Bewezen kwaliteit door reviews

Bewezen kwaliteit door reviews

Studenten hebben al meer dan 850.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet jij zeker dat je de beste keuze maakt!

In een paar klikken geregeld

In een paar klikken geregeld

Geen gedoe — betaal gewoon eenmalig met iDeal, creditcard of je Stuvia-tegoed en je bent klaar. Geen abonnement nodig.

Direct to-the-point

Direct to-the-point

Studenten maken samenvattingen voor studenten. Dat betekent: actuele inhoud waar jij écht wat aan hebt. Geen overbodige details!

Veelgestelde vragen

Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?

Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.

Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?

Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.

Van wie koop ik deze samenvatting?

Stuvia is een marktplaats, je koop dit document dus niet van ons, maar van verkoper TestTrackers. Stuvia faciliteert de betaling aan de verkoper.

Zit ik meteen vast aan een abonnement?

Nee, je koopt alleen deze samenvatting voor €17,67. Je zit daarna nergens aan vast.

Is Stuvia te vertrouwen?

4,6 sterren op Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

Afgelopen 30 dagen zijn er 69052 samenvattingen verkocht

Opgericht in 2010, al 15 jaar dé plek om samenvattingen te kopen

Begin nu gratis
€17,67
  • (0)
In winkelwagen
Toegevoegd