PEARSON (PEARSON) • Religious Studies 2016

This essay covers unit 4.2 of the Edexcel Religious Studies specification - Analogy - in unit 4 Religious Language. It is used in Section C of Paper 1 (Question 4), includes a synoptic link, and can be tailored to earlier questions of the paper. This essay includes exploring verification and falsification to argue religious language is meaningless, examining ideas of A J Ayer and A Flew. Evaluations include ideas from other key scholars such as Hick and Hare, and the essay ends with a conclusion...

This essay covers unit 4.1 (b) of the Edexcel Religious Studies specification - Symbol - in unit 4 Religious Language. It is used in Section C of Paper 1 (Question 4), includes a synoptic link, and can be tailored to earlier questions of the paper. The first part of the essay explores different ways symbols are used in the context of religious language, which is then followed by evaluations of symbols and religious language as a whole. The essay involves various key scholars' thoughts and ideas...

This essay covers unit 4.1 (a) of the Edexcel Religious Studies specification - Analogy - in unit 4 Religious Language. It is used in Section C of Paper 1 (Question 4), includes a synoptic link, and can be tailored to earlier questions of the paper. The first part of the essay explores the debate of religious language, before exploring different forms of analogous language, such as Via Negativa and Aquinas' analogy of proportion and attribution. The essay has different evaluations of analogous ...

This essay covers unit 3 of the Edexcel Religious Studies specification - the Problems of Evil and Suffering. It is used in Section C of Paper 1 (Question 4), includes a synoptic link, and can be tailored to earlier questions of the paper. The first part of the essay defines the debate in unit 3.2, such as by explaining the inconsistent triad and the different types of evil. The essay then moves to 3.2 by exploring each solution to the problem of evil such as the soul-deciding theodicy (3.2 (a))...

This essay covers unit 2 of the Edexcel Religious Studies specification - the nature and influence of religious experience. It can be used in Section C of Paper 1 (Question 4), includes a synoptic link, and can be tailored to earlier questions. The first part of the essay explores the nature, shown in unit 2.1, such as the different types of religious experiences as well as descriptions of them. The essay then moves on to unit 2.2 (a) through examining the influence of the experiences, such as ...

This essay covers unit 1.2 of the Edexcel Religious Studies specification - the Ontological argument. It is used in Section C of Paper 1 (Question 4), includes a synoptic link, and can be tailored to earlier questions of the paper. The first part of the essay explores the debate shown in 1.3 (a), such as explanations into a priori arguments, deductive reasoning and analytic propositions. The essay then begins to examine different types of the argument, based on different definitions of God, show...

This essay covers unit 1.2 of the Edexcel Religious Studies specification - the Cosmological argument. It is used in Section C of Paper 1 (Question 4), includes a synoptic link, and can be tailored to earlier questions of the paper. The first part of the essay explores the debate shown in 1.2 (a), such as explanations into inductive reasoning and a posteriori arguments. The essay then begins to examine different types of the argument shown in 1.2 (b), such as the Principle of Sufficient Reason, ...

This essay covers unit 1.1 of the Edexcel Religious Studies specification - the Design argument. It is used in Section C of Paper 1 (Question 4), includes a synoptic link, and can be tailored to earlier questions of the paper. The first part of the essay explores the debate shown in 1.1 (a), such as explanations into inductive reasoning and a posteriori arguments. The essay then begins to examine different types of the argument shown in 1.1 (b), such as analogy and the anthropic principle, and r...

In depth well written essays on the topic of Ethical Egoism with reference to Many philosophers such as Max Stirner and criticisms include philsophers such as rachels. There is exemplar answers for explaining ethical egoism and the challanges and a 30 marker where you are arguing for and agaisnt. Marked by teachers and given A*.

Includes 2 20 markers both explaining and challanges as 30 marker. Marked by my teachers and graded A* 20/20 29/30. Well structured and detailed.