Arson 2nd degree - Study guides, Class notes & Summaries

Katz v. United States - CORRECT ANSWER-Electronic surveillance; the court held that they must have a warrant to tap your phone or video record you Mapp v. Ohio - CORRECT ANSWER-exclusionary rule Graham v. Connor - CORRECT ANSWER-determined that the reasonableness of a particular use of force must be judged from the perspective of how a reasonable officer on the scene would respond, rather than from the 20/20 perspective of hindsight. 1. Severity 2. Pose an immediate threat 3. Active resis...

10th amendment - Specifically retains rights it specifically granted to the federal gov to the state or to the people 13 year-17 years - Juvenile 14th amendment - Not part of the bill of rights. Due process. Equal protection under the law 15th amendment - Right to vote 1st amendment - Freedom of Religion, Freedom of Speech, Freedom of the Press, Right to Assemble and Petition 2nd amendment - Right to bear arms. Right to have a military 2nd Degree Forgery - Possesses or alters any writing...

Katz v. United States - CORRECT ANSWER-Electronic surveillance; the court held that they must have a warrant to tap your phone or video record you Mapp v. Ohio - CORRECT ANSWER-exclusionary rule Graham v. Connor - CORRECT ANSWER-determined that the reasonableness of a particular use of force must be judged from the perspective of how a reasonable officer on the scene would respond, rather than from the 20/20 perspective of hindsight. 1. Severity 2. Pose an immediate threat 3. Active resis...

A person dresses up as a police officer to pretend he is a real cop and performs a traffic stop. During the traffic stop, he asks the person personal questions. What crime did this person commit? - AnswerCriminal Impersonation 1st Degree A person goes into someone's computer, sends themselves an email, and deletes all evidence. What crimes have been committed? - Answer-Computer Trespass, Theft, and Malicious Mischief. A person goes house to house pretending to be a representative of a busin...

Katz v. United States - correct answer Electronic surveillance; the court held that they must have a warrant to tap your phone or video record you Mapp v. Ohio - correct answer exclusionary rule Graham v. Connor - correct answer determined that the reasonableness of a particular use of force must be judged from the perspective of how a reasonable officer on the scene would respond, rather than from the 20/20 perspective of hindsight. 1. Severity 2. Pose an immediate threat 3. Active resi...

BLEA 834 Criminal Law Final Review Latest Update Graded A A person dresses up as a police officer to pretend he is a real cop and performs a traffic stop. During the traffic stop, he asks the person personal questions. What crime did this person commit? Criminal Impersonation 1st Degree A person goes into someone's computer, sends themselves an email, and deletes all evidence. What crimes have been committed? Computer Trespass, Theft, and Malicious Mischief. A person goes house to house pret...

Katz v. United States Correct Answer Electronic surveillance; the court held that they must have a warrant to tap your phone or video record you Mapp v. Ohio Correct Answer exclusionary rule Graham v. Connor Correct Answer determined that the reasonableness of a particular use of force must be judged from the perspective of how a reasonable officer on the scene would respond, rather than from the 20/20 perspective of hindsight. 1. Severity 2. Pose an immediate threat 3. Active resistance o...

1000 feet - how far does a defendant found guilty of sex crimes have to live from a school or child care facility 2 degrees - how many degrees of sexual misconduct? 5 years of the commission of the offense - arson first degree, arson second degree, knowingly burning or exploding - how long to commence prosecution? 500 feet - how far must they stay away from school or child care facility? Presence or loitering within how many feet? 6 months of its commission - any infraction must be filed ...

Katz v. United States Correct Answer: Electronic surveillance; the court held that they must have a warrant to tap your phone or video record you Mapp v. Ohio Correct Answer: exclusionary rule Graham v. Connor Correct Answer: determined that the reasonableness of a particular use of force must be judged from the perspective of how a reasonable officer on the scene would respond, rather than from the 20/20 perspective of hindsight. 1. Severity 2. Pose an immediate threat 3. Active re...

Act Bodily movement and includes words and possession of property Conduct Act or omission and its accompanying state of mind Criminal Negligence A gross deviation from the standard of care a reasonable person would exercise Culpable Mental State With intent or knowingly or willfully or recklessly or with criminal negligence Intentionally or with Intent When a person's conscious objective is to cause the specific result proscribed by the statute. It does not matt...