Graham v connor Study guides, Class notes & Summaries

Utah SFO Final| 250 questions| with complete solutions. When should you get a written statement (4 reasons) correct answer: -Reluctant -Key witness -Will not be able to testify -May change statement in court Brown V. Mississippi 1936 correct answer: Use of force in obtaining a confession will make the confession inadmissible in court 4 behavioral signs of addiction correct answer: Neglecting responsibilities -Unexplained reasons for money -Engaging in suspicious behavior -Taking unnece...

FLETC Written Exam #1 Questions and Answers 100% VerifiedFLETC Written Exam #1 Questions and Answers 100% VerifiedFLETC Written Exam #1 Questions and Answers 100% VerifiedFLETC Written Exam #1 Questions and Answers 100% VerifiedFLETC Written Exam #1 Questions and Answers 100% Verified Graham v. Connor (1989) - ANSWER-Recognized that the right to make an arrest or investigatory stop necessarily carries with it the right to use some degree of physical coercion/threat to affect it. In the cour...

Graham v. Connor (1989) - ANSWER Recognized that the right to make an arrest or investigatory stop necessarily carries with it the right to use some degree of physical coercion/threat to affect it. In the course of an arrest or stop is properly analyzed by Fourth Amendment's 'objective reasonableness' standard Graham Factors - ANSWER Severity of crime Whether suspect poses an immediate threat Whether suspect is actively resisting arrest Attempting to evade arrest by flight Additi...

Graham v. Connor (1989) - ANSWER-Recognized that the right to make an arrest or investigatory stop necessarily carries with it the right to use some degree of physical coercion/threat to affect it. In the course of an arrest or stop is properly analyzed by Fourth Amendment's 'objective reasonableness' standard Graham Factors - ANSWER-Severity of crime Whether suspect poses an immediate threat Whether suspect is actively resisting arrest Attempting to evade arrest by flight Additi...

GPSTC FINAL EXAM QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ALREADY PASSED Whatever force is REASONABLE How much force can be used to affect an arrest? arrest Restricting a persons movement Graham v. Connor What court case established objective reasonableness? Terry v. Ohio Stop and Frisk. What case? Actual and Constructive What are the 2 types of seizures? seizure a government termination of movement through means intentionally applied 1. Verbal Encounter 2. Brief Seizure 3. Arrest ...

LESB PHASE 2 EXAM 2024 WITH 100% CORRECT ANSWERS Comply voluntarily - correct answer Your goal is always to get subjects to ______ __________. Psychomotor - correct answer DAAT techniques are _________ skills, which mean that they involve both the brain and the muscles. - To achieve and maintain control of resistive subjects - To detain persons reasonably suspected of criminal behavior - To make lawful arrests - To defend themselves or others - To prevent escape - correct answer ...

What are the Graham (Graham v Connor) Factors? - Seriousness of the offense Immediate Danger Resistance Flight What 4 things are needed for Consent to search? - Authority to give consent Knowing and voluntary Scope Execute Lawfully 4 types of authority to give consent

Katz v. United States Electronic surveillance; the court held that they must have a warrant to tap your phone or video record you Mapp v. Ohio exclusionary rule Graham v. Connor determined that the reasonableness of a particular use of force must be judged from the perspective of how a reasonable officer on the scene would respond, rather than from the 20/20 perspective of hindsight. 1. Severity 2. Pose an immediate threat 3. Active resistance or flee Tennessee v. Garner Deadly force may ...

Mapp v. Ohio Ans- federal court exclusionary rule to the states Terry v. Ohio Ans- Creates stop and frisk Nix v. Williams Ans- inevitable discovery Katz v. US Ans- reasonable expectation of privacy Who investigates aliens being smuggled or trafficked or aliens engaged in narcotics trafficking, bulk cash smuggling production of counterfeit ID documentation or nation security and terrorism Ans- Homeland Security Special Agents Graham v. Connor Ans- objective reasonableness Brower v...

Katz v. United States Electronic surveillance; the court held that they must have a warrant to tap your phone or video record you Mapp v. Ohio exclusionary rule Graham v. Connor determined that the reasonableness of a particular use of force must be judged from the perspective of how a reasonable officer on the scene would respond, rather than from the 20/20 perspective of hindsight. 1. Severity 2. Pose an immediate threat 3. Active resistance or flee Tennessee v. Garner Deadly force may ...