Tcps 2 core review - Study guides, Class notes & Summaries

Research Ethics Board (REB) research oversight group that evaluates research to protect the rights of participants in the study Researcher's intention is to... -to NOT deliberately harm the people who agree to participate in a research project -The intent to do no harm, however, is not a guarantee that no harm will occur. The Stanford Prison Experiment -Philip Zimbardo's study of the effect of roles on behavior. -Participants were randomly assigned to play either prisoners or guards...

In the TCPS 2, three complementary core principles serve as the guide to ethical research involving human participants: - Answer- Respect for Persons Concern for Welfare Justice Respect for Persons - Answer- recognizing the intrinsic value of each individual and their autonomy. In the context of research, it means recognizing that participants should only subject themselves to the risks of participation in research as a matter of choice, based on the information they need or request to ...

What is the participant perspective? - Answer- Circumstances of the people they will be approaching to become participants What are some questions to ask about the participants of the project? - Answer- Is there a power relationship between the researcher and the participants (e.g. doctor/patient, teacher/student, supervisor/assistant)? Are there any cultural norms or practices that need to be factored into the recruitment, consent, or debriefing process? What are the economic circumstances...

What is the term used to describe a researcher's right to disseminate the results of their inquiries, to challenge conventional thought, and to express their opinions without censorship? - Answer- Academic Freedom The term ____ refers to researchers' obligation to keep participants' personal information safe from unauthorized access, use, disclosure, modification, loss or theft. - Answer- Ethical Responsibility What is the term used to describe research in which the probability of being...

Research Ethics Board (REB) - Answer- research oversight group that evaluates research to protect the rights of participants in the study Researcher's intention is to... - Answer- -to NOT deliberately harm the people who agree to participate in a research project -The intent to do no harm, however, is not a guarantee that no harm will occur. The Stanford Prison Experiment - Answer- -Philip Zimbardo's study of the effect of roles on behavior. -Participants were randomly assigned to play...

1. Research Ethics Board (REB): research oversight group that evaluates re- search to protect the rights of participants in the study 2. Researcher's intention is to...: -to NOT deliberately harm the people who agree to participate in a research project -The intent to do no harm, however, is not a guarantee that no harm will occur. 3. The Stanford Prison Experiment: -Philip Zimbardo's study of the effect of roles on behavior. -Participants were randomly assigned to play either prisoners or...

What happened in the Seattle artificial kidney program? correct answer: 1962 When dialysis was perfected, not everyone who wanted it could receive it, so they had t decide who could and could not get it. What was the Tuskegee study? correct answer: - recruited black males who needed money and were desperate to give them syphilis - The men did not have informed consent, they told that they were being treated for "bad blood" - They did not receive proper treatment - lasted 40 year...

Which of the following statements is/are true (select all that apply)? A) Research involving secondary use of identifiable information requires REB review, but not consent. B) REBs may waive the consent requirement for research involving secondary use of identifiable information, at their discretion. C) REBs may waive the consent requirement for research involving secondary use of identifiable information if the researcher satisfies six conditions. D) Where research involves the secondary us...

TCPS 2_ CORE Review (Multiple choice)Correctly Answered.

Canadian researchers are responsible for making sure that their work adheres to the guidance provided in TCPS 2. This means that: - ANSWER-Pursuing research interests without also considering the implications of the research for participants is unethical. The Texas Vampires incident captures a number of practices that could easily be labeled unethical. For example, as a way to increase the sample size for the study, individuals were told that not participating in the research could put ...