Graham v connor - Study guides, Class notes & Summaries

This Supreme Court case established the Exclusionary Rule and said that probable cause must be used to gain a search warrant. If not, the search will be illegal and evidence collected as a result of the search can't be used in court. A. New York v. Belton B. Gideon v. Wainright C. People v. Disher D. Weeks v. US - D. Weeks v. US Police Officers may question a suspect that has an attorney already, about crimes for which he has been charged if the Police Officer(s) provide Miranda Warning...

Graham v. Connor (1989) Recognized that the right to make an arrest or investigatory stop necessarily carries with it the right to use some degree of physical coercion/threat to affect it. In the course of an arrest or stop is properly analyzed by Fourth Amendment's 'objective reasonableness' standard Graham Factors Severity of crime Whether suspect poses an immediate threat Whether suspect is actively resisting arrest Attempting to evade arrest by flight

Miranda vs. Arizona - CORRECT ANSWER-The supreme court case in which the court held that criminal suspects must be informed of their right to consult with an attorney and of their right against self-incrimination prior to questioning by police. Mapp v. Ohio - CORRECT ANSWER-Evidence illegally gathered by the police may not be used in a criminal trial Terry vs. Ohio - CORRECT ANSWER-Allowed the police to stop and search a suspect if he has reasonable suspicion that the person has committed...

FLETC Written Exam #1 Study Guide. Graham v. Connor (1989) - answerRecognized that the right to make an arrest or investigatory stop necessarily carries with it the right to use some degree of physical coercion/threat to affect it. In the course of an arrest or stop is properly analyzed by Fourth Amendment's 'objective reasonableness' standard Graham Factors - answerSeverity of crime Whether suspect poses an immediate threat Whether suspect is actively resisting arrest Attempting to ...

Miranda vs. Arizona - CORRECT ANSWER-The supreme court case in which the court held that criminal suspects must be informed of their right to consult with an attorney and of their right against self-incrimination prior to questioning by police. Mapp v. Ohio - CORRECT ANSWER-Evidence illegally gathered by the police may not be used in a criminal trial Terry vs. Ohio - CORRECT ANSWER-Allowed the police to stop and search a suspect if he has reasonable suspicion that the person has committed...

FLETC Written Exam #1 Review Questions and answers, VERIFIED/ Graham v. Connor (1989) - -Recognized that the right to make an arrest or investigatory stop necessarily carries with it the right to use some degree of physical coercion/threat to affect it. In the course of an arrest or stop is properly analyzed by Fourth Amendment's 'objective reasonableness' standard Graham Factors - -Severity of crime Whether suspect poses an immediate threat Whether suspect is actively resisting a...

Utah SFO Final Exam Questions and Answers Already Passed When should you get a written statement (4 reasons) -Reluctant -Key witness -Will not be able to testify -May change statement in court Brown V. Mississippi 1936 Use of force in obtaining a confession will make the confession inadmissible in court 4 behavioral signs of addiction Neglecting responsibilities -Unexplained reasons for money -Engaging in suspicious behavior -Taking unnecessary risks Legal Search Items -Wea...

Mapp v. Ohio - correct answer federal court exclusionary rule to the states Terry v. Ohio - correct answer Creates stop and frisk Nix v. Williams - correct answer inevitable discovery Katz v. US - correct answer reasonable expectation of privacy Who investigates aliens being smuggled or trafficked or aliens engaged in narcotics trafficking, bulk cash smuggling production of counterfeit ID documentation or nation security and terrorism - correct answer Homeland Security Special Agents...

CLEET Certification Exam (Latest 2024/ 2025 Update) Questions and Verified Answers| 100% Correct| Grade A Q: The titles of Oklahoma's statutes most frequently used by law enforcement officers in Oklahoma are what? Answer: 21,22,37a,47 and 63 Q: The exception to the hearsay rule that allows the jury to hear a statement made while the declarant was still under the stress caused by the crime is commonly known as what? Answer: Excited utterance exception Q: The three ma...

FLETC WRITTEN EXAM 1 QUESTIONS AND CORRECT ANSWERS 2023/2024 GRADED A+. 2 / 32 1. Graham v. Connor (1989): Recognized that the right to make an arrest or investigatory stop necessarily carries with it the right to use some degree of physical coercion/threat to affect it. In the course of an arrest or stop is properly analyzed by Fourth Amendment's 'objective reasonableness' standard 2. Graham Factors: Severity of crime Whether suspect poses an immediate threat Whether suspect is act...