Phil347 week 2 discussion - Samenvattingen en Aantekeningen

PHIL 347 Week 3 Discussion 2; Understanding Deductive Categorical Reasoning

PHIL 347 Week 2 Discussion; Evidence-Based Arguments

PHIL 347 Week 2 Discussion; Evidence-Based Arguments LATEST UPDATE 2023.

InitialPostInstructions Deductivecategoricalreasoningisdemanding.Itsformsarerigid,buttheyarerigidwitha reason; deductive categorical arguments are intended to prove the conclusion. If thepremises are true and the conclusion logically follows, you have no choice but to acceptthe argument. The categorical syllogism is like a piece of machinery, the parts workingtogether to produce a result - in the case of the categorical syllogism, the truth of theconclusion. Fortheinitialpost,addressallofthefo...

InitialPostInstructions Evidence-basedpracticerequires...evidence.Thecarefulcollectionofevidenceisthefirst job of every medical practitioner, not least the nurse, who has the most extensiveandintimatecontactwiththepatient.However,itdoesnotstopwiththenurse. Whateveryourrole-socialworker,hospitaladministration,humanservices-whetheryour problem is the allocation of scarce resources, where to add or cut staff, or thetreatment plan for a patient, you will need to present and defend your position in...

PHIL347 Week 7 Discussion.Introduction At the very end of Chapter 13, there is a Group Exercise that asks: What ideals would you go to war to defend? We are not going to ask you to go to war, but we are going to ask you to think about what ideals or values you believe would be worth defending – even to the point of risking your life in their defense. When Nazi Germany overtook Europe in the early 20th Century, resistance movements sprung up in the occupied countries, and many civilians r...

PHIL 347 Week 2 Discussion; Evidence-Based Arguments