100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Qld Bar Exam – Evidence Questions with Correct Answers $12.99   Add to cart

Exam (elaborations)

Qld Bar Exam – Evidence Questions with Correct Answers

 0 view  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Queensland bar
  • Institution
  • Queensland Bar

Qld Bar Exam – Evidence Questions with Correct Answers

Preview 3 out of 24  pages

  • September 25, 2024
  • 24
  • 2024/2025
  • Exam (elaborations)
  • Questions & answers
  • Queensland bar
  • Queensland bar
avatar-seller
cracker
Qld Bar Exam – Evidence Questions with Correct
Answers
Legal Burden vs Evidentiary Burden of proof Correct Answer-
Evidentiary burden: BRING EVIDENCE. The burden of a party to bring
evidence that there is sufficient evidence to raise an issue as the
existence of a FII. The party who is making a claim or assertion must be
able to prove it with evidence.


Legal burden: PROVE THE EVIDENCE to a the standard, or level of
proof a party has an obligation to reach to prove a FII (e.g. Crown as to
BRD).


Judge's Discretion Correct Answer-A judge has a discretion to exclude
evidence (eg. a confession) on the ground that it is highly prejudicial and
not probative (reliable) or for public policy reasons (eg. evidence
illegally obtained): Bunning v Cross (1978); s130 Evidence Act 1977
(Qld); ss135-139 EA; R v Christie.


Browne v Dunn Correct Answer-Rule: Unless notice has been given,
Counsel that wishes to contradict a witness by calling other evidence
must put that evidence to the witness for their comment.


Rationale: Anti-ambush rule for fairness. Allows other party to call
evidence so they can explain it.
Court can then enjoy joinder evidence/FII.


Consequences of non-compliance:

,Ethical and evidentiary implications; can be given less weight, denial of
right to respond by party/witness, other party may be entitled recall
evidence/put rebuttal evidence. Potential mistrial, appeal or jury warning
given.


Provide an example.


Jones v Dunkel [1959] Correct Answer-Rule: In certain circumstances, a
party that provides an unexplained failure to provide evidence may lead
to an inference that the uncalled evidence would not have assisted the
party's case.


Rationale: Deterrence against parties tempted to withhold evidence;
promotes fairness, discourages parties from hiding or suppressing
evidence that could weaken their position, and promotes transparency.


Provide example.


When does Jones v Dunkel not apply? Correct Answer-Limited
application in criminal proceedings, can be used against Crown.


Also does not apply in the appropriate circumstances: 1) when the party
is 'required to explain or contradict something' and 2) it is within their
power to tender it, and 3) there is no adequate explanation as to failure.


Bunning v Cross [1978] Correct Answer-Rule: Evidence that was
obtained unlawfully/improperly must not be admitted unless the

, importance/probative value > factors (public interest, unfairness and
prejudice). Codified in s138 CEA. Factors are: deliberateness of the
conduct, probative value of the evidence, ease with which compliance
with law might have been achieved, nature of the offence charged,
purpose of the legislative restrictions.


Rationale: Striking a balance between enforcing public interest with fair
policing/disclosure against exclusion of evidence otherwise not
manifestly unfair/prejudicial (eg niche technical points). Operative
deterrence against bad policing and reliance on exclusionary rules of
evidence.


Exclusion of Relevant Evidence Correct Answer-1) R v Christie:
prejudicial value > probative value.
2) Unfairness in s 130 EAQ/s 135 EAC.
Provide example of each.


Admissibility of expert evidence Correct Answer-7 conditions, also in s
79 EAC.
1) Expert opinion is in field of specialised knowledge.
2) Identified aspect of that field which witness is an expert (by training,
study or experience.
3) The opinion is wholly/substantially based on the expert's
KNOWLEDGE
4) Expert must identify factual assumptions/primary facts which form
the opinion (assumption identification rule)

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller cracker. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $12.99. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

77333 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$12.99
  • (0)
  Add to cart