100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
LEGL 2700 Roessing Test 3 Study Questions and Answers GRADED A $14.49   Add to cart

Exam (elaborations)

LEGL 2700 Roessing Test 3 Study Questions and Answers GRADED A

 11 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • LEGL 2700 Roessing
  • Institution
  • LEGL 2700 Roessing

contract -Correct Answer a legally enforceable promise or an exchange of promises Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) -Correct Answer -covers the sale of goods -goods are tangible, movable items of personal property -applies to individuals & firms -uniform state law -Article 2: applies to contract...

[Show more]

Preview 3 out of 28  pages

  • November 8, 2024
  • 28
  • 2024/2025
  • Exam (elaborations)
  • Questions & answers
  • LEGL 2700 Roessing
  • LEGL 2700 Roessing
avatar-seller
PossibleA
LEGL 2700 Roessing Test 3



LEGL 2700 Roessing Test 3 Study
Questions and Answers 2024-2025
GRADED A
contract -Correct Answer ✔a legally enforceable promise or an exchange of promises

Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) -Correct Answer ✔-covers the sale of goods
-goods are tangible, movable items of personal property
-applies to individuals & firms
-uniform state law
-Article 2: applies to contracts
-Section 207: "Battle of Forms" -> Deal still goes through

bilateral contracts -Correct Answer ✔-involve a promise for promise exchange ( mutual
promises)
-acceptance is before action

unilateral contracts -Correct Answer ✔-exist when a promise is made in exchange for
performance
-ex. reward for lost pet
-acceptance has a time period before action is performed

express contracts -Correct Answer ✔parties discuss the promised terms of their
agreement

implied-in-fact contracts -Correct Answer ✔-arise from the conduct of the parties rather
than from the words
-Ex. asking an accountant for advice -> implies a promise to pay the going rate for this
advice

Leyden v. American Accreditation Healthcare Commission -Correct Answer ✔-Leyden
got terminated from her job -> claimed that termination was a breach of an implied
contract
-enforcing implied-in-fact agreements is an important means of ensuring that two
parties' intent to make binding promises is honored
-implied-in-fact must contain the same elements as contracts -> acceptance and
consideration
-employers can weaken the presumption of an at-will employment relationship by
making statements about the employee rights and expectation in policies and manuals




LEGL 2700 Roessing Test 3

,LEGL 2700 Roessing Test 3


implied-in-law contract -Correct Answer ✔when one party is unjustly enriched at the
expense of another, the law may imply a duty on the first party to pay the second even
though there is no contract between the two parties

quasi-contract -Correct Answer ✔not true contracts, but a judicial remedy to prevent on
part from receiving unjust enrichment

enforceable contract -Correct Answer ✔when courts uphold the validity of such
promises

unenforceable contract -Correct Answer ✔if a nonperforming party has a justifiable
reason for noncompliance with a promise

valid contract -Correct Answer ✔-when an agreement is enforceable because all the
essential requirements are present
-can be voided by both parties

void contract -Correct Answer ✔-one that appears to be an agreement but lacks an
essential requirement for validity and enforceability
-only minor can get out of contract

in pari delicto -Correct Answer ✔a situation in which both parties are equally at fault in
an illegal contract

voidable contract -Correct Answer ✔-an agreement when at least one party has the
right to withdraw from the promise made without incurring any legal liability
-can't be voided by either parties

executed contract -Correct Answer ✔one in which the parties have performed their
promises

executory contract -Correct Answer ✔when the parties have not yet performed their
agreement

Elements of an Enforceable Contract -Correct Answer ✔-Offer to enter into a contract
-Acceptance of the offer
-Consideration for each promise
-Capacity of each party to enter into a binding agreement
-Legality of subject matter

Defenses to Contract Enforcement -Correct Answer ✔-Improper form when a writing is
required
-no true meeting of the minds due to fraud or mistake




LEGL 2700 Roessing Test 3

, LEGL 2700 Roessing Test 3


offer -Correct Answer ✔contains a specific promise and a specific amount

indefiniteness -Correct Answer ✔When the terms of an agreement are not definite and
specific

revocation -Correct Answer ✔when the offeror retracts the offer before the acceptance

rejection -Correct Answer ✔-when the offeree rejects the offer
-voids the offer

counteroffer -Correct Answer ✔-when the offeree makes a counterproposal
-has the effect of rejecting the original offer and sending back a new offer for a different
contract
-can't change offer and get original offer

lapse of time -Correct Answer ✔when the offeree fails to accept by a deadline defined in
the offer or after a reasonable period of time

subject matter destruction -Correct Answer ✔when the object of the contract is
destroyed or legally eliminated

offeror death or insanity -Correct Answer ✔-when the offeror no longer has the capacity
to make the offer
-can revoke offer on your behalf

subject matter illegality -Correct Answer ✔when a change in the law renders the
agreement illegal, acceptance is no longer possible

acceptance -Correct Answer ✔-is necessary to create a valid, enforceable contract
-"mirror image rule" -> common law
-counter-offer = rejection under common law

Mirror Image Rule -Correct Answer ✔for an acceptance to create a binding contract,
standard contract law requires that the acceptance must match it exactly

Gottlieb and Co v. Alps South Corporation -Correct Answer ✔-Alps requested
consequential damages from Gottlieb related to the customers' complaints
-Gottlieb claimed that its finished goods form excluded such liability
-Court found that Gottlieb's term was included in the contract even though it appeared
only on Gottlieb's forms and was not specifically discussed by the parties
-Alps' failure to read Gottlieb's forms was irrelevant -> generally true as a contract law
principle
-If Alps foresaw the likelihood of certain outcomes, it should have addressed it with
Gottlieb



LEGL 2700 Roessing Test 3

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller PossibleA. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $14.49. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

62890 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$14.49
  • (0)
  Add to cart