Summary
Summary Frank Furedi on Historical Materialism
- Module
- Marx and Marxism
- Institution
- Oxford University (OX)
Notes on Furedi's excellent writing on historical materialism
[Show more]
Content preview
Franz Jakubowski - Ideology and Superstructure in Historical MaterialismIntroduction: Frank Furedi
Restating the Problem
● Secondary literature on Marx tends to have a narrow focus: clarifying Marx’s views in a
particular sphere; textual analysis; attention to a few paragraphs
○ Marx’s ‘brief comments on method’ in the Preface to A Contribution to
the Critique of Political Economy are regarded as a complete account of historical
materialism
■ this paragraph does refer to some of the key relations of
human history, but it should be understood as a statement of the conclusions or
results of Marx’s theory, rather than his whole theory of historical materialism
■ such attempts to isolate elements of Marx’s theory lead
to abstractions (e.g. What is included in the base?) that presuppose a fixed logic
of Marx’s theory, which does not exist
○ Both friends and enemies of Marx employ a similar procedure in
explaining his theoretical approach. Both treat historical materialism as a fixed logic or
model laid out in the Preface, and:
■ enemies bombard the theory with empirical facts that
appear to refute it
■ friends obsess over the fragments alluded to in the
Preface e.g. base-superstructure debate, assuming fixed concepts
● the blindness is that the conclusions of
the Preface came from a great deal of theorising, which is ignored in
such an approach
■ Marx’s critique is both materialist - he attempted to
derive ideological and legal notions from economic relations - and historical - he
attempted to explain how such notions evolved in modern society
● but those who interpret Marx ignore his
critique, and simply isolate his conclusions.
○ ‘Abstracted from their
origins, they can be assigned any meaning and can be defined
and re-defined according to the preoccupations of the author.’
○ The attempt to transform Marx’s theory into a model with fixed
definitions is antithetical to historical materialism
■ Marx critiqued the static nature of bourgeois social
science - defining and classifying phenomena
● for Marx - society is in constant flux and
particular phenomena can only be understood in their relation and
interaction with other phenomena
● e.g. a capitalist is only a capitalist
through establishing a particular relation (exploitation of workers) to
others
● defining a social phenomena takes it out
of history - thus neglecting the historical component of historical
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller patrickfleming. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for £3.49. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
Can Stuvia be trusted?
4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
48072 documents were sold in the last 30 days
Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy revision notes and other study material for 15 years now