Carefully selected notes for Public Law at Queen Mary University of London, one of the finest institutions in the world. Study these notes properly alongside your other course material and you should be on track to score a high 2:1 or a first class answer. TIP: Buy the bundle to save money and cove...
->The Selectcommittee proposes names to the lord chancellor
who consults with First ministers of Scotland, Wales and
secretary state for Northern
of Ireland.
(with readores or require reconsideration.
-> can accept,
reject
-> to make itofficial, pm makes a recommendation to the monarch.
- 3 Recommendation only by the PMI
only the candidate proposed can be
-
- recommended shows how itis
justaformality and am has no
power.
-
-> white, ma I, late 50'sor 60's.
All
Careers these gentlemen talked aboutin
of
nks< lecture at 35:00ming.
2 female
-> (Baroness Hall
-> All white still.
, Consideration on the
who sits
34 selection
on
commission interns of
gender and race.
3Diversity tie-breaker allows
the selection seled
commission to
the underrepresented candidatefor
↳ There can be more
increasing
of
diversity when bothare
esval merit.
than 12 full-time judges i.e judges who
work part-time.
,>Move
·
divaeNse.
, Tutorial II
Further
-
Reading!
Balms and Yallison
Avert the Lord Chancellor played a vital role in
appointing
judges que (RD2005. CourtotAppeal and above , the LIgave
a recommendetion to the pin
who forwardedthe name to the
monarch.
Highbut below, I recommended candidates
and
directly the
to monarch after consulting withindiciary andother
-> Criticisms advanced were: senior members -
judicial
is lackof independence:
↳An independen+ cudiciave
-
was fundamental for the judiciary
I
to hold the executive accountable and uphold the ROL.
However, the people in charge of the promotions of the judges
were in the execu five i.e the LC which presented an issue.
The judiciary mightbe move sympathetic towards a
particular
political party or the executive as might
it
help him/her
which
gain personal benefits in
promotions
negates
the an
conceptof independent judinary
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller bilalyousif. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for £7.29. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
