Lecture notes
denial of offences+ defences
1st year law llb lecture notes from myself a student at city university of london who obtained a First in my exams revising from these notes
[Show more]
Connected book
Book Title:
Author(s):
- Edition:
- ISBN:
- Edition:
Content preview
Lecture 3- Denials of an ofenceTechnical diferennanon of denials/defences
Denial of an ofence
Denial of the actus reus or mens rea (or both)
D has to bring some evidence to support this. Such evidence can in some cases be used against D
Defences
Actus reus and mens rea are present but there is an excuse (defence)
Specifc- available onl on some ofences
General- available on all ofences
Intoxicanon
General rule: drunken intent is snll intent (R v Kingston 1994- In this case D did form intent so he was
not able to rel on the defence of intoxicanon)
Principle of prior fault (no MR)
Majewski 1976- “if a man of his own volinon takes a substance which causes him to cast of the
restraints of reason and conscience, no wrong is done to him b holding him answerable criminall
for an injur he ma do while in that condinonn (should be answerable).
When is the prior conduct so blameworth that we can use prior fault to subsntute for the missing
mens rea? If:
D’s intoxicanon was voluntar
It was a basic intent ofence
The intoxicanng substance was dangerous
D lacked MR because of the intoxicanon
Then D is liable (T1- drinking T2- is commitng the ofence)
1. voluntar or involuntar
If involuntar , D has not chosen to take intoxicanon risks. Intoxicanon rules will not be used to
replace the lack of mens rea= no liabilit (Allen 1988- D’s intoxicanon was voluntar ) (kingston 1994-
involuntar intoxicanon but snll had mens rea, D had paedophilic tendencies alread ) (Ross v HM
advocate 1991- no intent and involuntar intoxicanon)
If voluntar …
2. Specifc or basic?
Specifc intent ofences: Intoxicanon will NOT be used to replace a lack of mens rea = no liabilit .
Basic intent ofences: Intoxicanon can replace a lack of mens rea
DPP v Majewski 1977; Heard 2007
Murder = specifc (Beard 1920)
Manslaughter = basic (Beard 1920)
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller remycorrina. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for £3.49. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
Can Stuvia be trusted?
4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
56326 documents were sold in the last 30 days
Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy revision notes and other study material for 14 years now