100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Previously searched by you
Previously searched by you
logo
Summary Unit 3 AC3.2 criminology WJEC model answer $4.53
Add to cart
Quickly navigate to
Preview
  2.  
  3. WJEC
  4.  
  5. Criminology
  6.  
  7. Crime Scene to Courtroom

Summary

Summary Unit 3 AC3.2 criminology WJEC model answer

1 review
 4 purchases
  • Course
  • Crime Scene to Courtroom
  • Institution
  • WJEC

Model answer that was created and used by two A* students who both received 100% in the final Unit 3 exam. Detailed description of all the different types of conclusions draw from evidence/information. *please note don’t copy exactly as it would be considered plagiarism).

Preview 2 out of 7  pages

Document information

  • April 9, 2023
  • 7
  • 2022/2023
  • Summary

Subjects

  • unit 3
  • conclusions
  • criminology
  • ac32

Written for

  • A/AS Level
  • WJEC
  • Criminology
  • Crime Scene to Courtroom
All documents for this subject (388)

1  review

review-writer-avatar

By: jessiegriffiths • 1 year ago

Seller

avatar-seller
erinhurst

Reviews received

Content preview

AC3.2 Draw conclusions from information (15
marks)

Specification Requirements

Content Amplification

Conclusions Learners should develop skills to analyse
information, in order to draw conclusions based on
● Just verdicts reasoned evidence.
● Miscarriage
In their controlled assessment response,
● Safe verdict learners should make reference to the
assignment brief and other examples they have
● Just sentencing studied.




1

, Just Verdicts
What is a just verdict?
Jurors are told to reach a verdict that is both fair and just, but some verdicts have lacked justice and
fairness in the eyes of the law therefore they are considered “unjust”. In order for a verdict to be just it
must be impartial and consider all the information and evidence given as well as any circumstances
that surround the case, this will make it fair. The jury includes laypersons, who can be susceptible to
external factors such as the media and biases. In some cases it can take years for a just verdict to be
reached.




Case study of a just verdict: Stephen Lawrence
Stephen Lawrence was murdered in April 1993. It was an unprovoked attack, he was stabbed to death
by a young white gang while waiting at the bus stop. After the murder several residents provided the
names of the suspects and a note was left on a telephone box with the name of the 5 suspects. Luke
Knight, David Norris, Jamie and Neil Acourt and Gary Dobson. However no arrests were made.
Lawrence’s family complained that the police were not doing enough. Police arrested the 5 suspects
but the charges were dropped due to insufficient evidence. Some people believed that the
investigation was corrupt due to the relationship between detectives and the gang members.
After new forensic evidence was found Dobson and Norris faced trail of the murder of Stephen. On
January 3rd 2012 they were found guilty. This verdict is unjust because despite the 5 men being
identified by Duwanye Brooks and being charged with the murder only two of them are serving life
sentences while the other suspects of the murder have never faced justice. After perseverance and
campaigns by Lawrence’s family Gary and David were found guilty. This was 19 years after the
lengthy investigation, this investigation involved professional incompetence, institutional racism and a
lack of leadership. To begin with it took the police two weeks to make any arrests despite numerous
residents making identifications. This meant the murderers had time to destroy key evidence like the
clothes they were wearing. The original investigation didn’t convict those responsible and the
campaign for justice led by Lawrence’s family led to a public enquiry. The large amount of time it took
to reach justice, and the fact that not all those involved in the murder were convicted means the verdict
is unjust.




Miscarriage of Justice
What is a miscarriage of justice?
2

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller erinhurst. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $4.53. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

67479 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 15 years now

Start selling
$4.53  4x  sold
  • (1)
Add to cart
Added