Terry v ohio Study guides, Class notes & Summaries

Mapp v. Ohio Ans- federal court exclusionary rule to the states Terry v. Ohio Ans- Creates stop and frisk Nix v. Williams Ans- inevitable discovery Katz v. US Ans- reasonable expectation of privacy Who investigates aliens being smuggled or trafficked or aliens engaged in narcotics trafficking, bulk cash smuggling production of counterfeit ID documentation or nation security and terrorism Ans- Homeland Security Special Agents Graham v. Connor Ans- objective reasonableness Brower v...

federal court exclusionary rule to the states : Mapp v. Ohio Creates stop and frisk : Terry v. Ohio inevitable discovery : Nix v. Williams reasonable expectation of privacy : Katz v. US Homeland Security Special Agents 2 | P a g e : Who investigates aliens being smuggled or trafficked or aliens engaged in narcotics trafficking, bulk cash smuggling production of counterfeit ID documentation or nation security and terrorism objective reasonableness : Graham v. Connor Seizure occur...

MPOETC STUDY GUIDE QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS, GRADED A+/ VERIFIED. Mapp v. Ohio - -federal court exclusionary rule to the states Terry v. Ohio - -Creates stop and frisk Nix v. Williams - -inevitable discovery Katz v. US - -reasonable expectation of privacy Who investigates aliens being smuggled or trafficked or aliens engaged in narcotics trafficking, bulk cash smuggling production of counterfeit ID documentation or nation security and terrorism - - Homeland Security Special Agents Graham ...

Criminal Justice NOCTI, Criminal Justice NOCTISubpoena - correct answer a legal document ordering a person to testify in a court of law as a witness Actus Reus - correct answer The actual criminal act Mens Rea - correct answer legal phrase used to describe the mental state a person must have been in while committing a crime for it to be intentional Loops - correct answer the most common fingerprint Chain of Custody - correct answer a process used to maintain and document the chr...

Mapp v. Ohio : federal court exclusionary rule to the states Terry v. Ohio : Creates stop and frisk Nix v. Williams : inevitable discovery Katz v. US : reasonable expectation of privacy Who investigates aliens being smuggled or trafficked or aliens engaged in narcotics trafficking, bulk cash smuggling production of counterfeit ID documentation or nation security and terrorism 2 | P a g e : Homeland Security Special Agents Graham v. Connor : objective reasonableness Brower v. Iny...

Miranda vs. Arizona - CORRECT ANSWER-The supreme court case in which the court held that criminal suspects must be informed of their right to consult with an attorney and of their right against self-incrimination prior to questioning by police. Mapp v. Ohio - CORRECT ANSWER-Evidence illegally gathered by the police may not be used in a criminal trial Terry vs. Ohio - CORRECT ANSWER-Allowed the police to stop and search a suspect if he has reasonable suspicion that the person has committed...

Miranda vs. Arizona - CORRECT ANSWER-The supreme court case in which the court held that criminal suspects must be informed of their right to consult with an attorney and of their right against self-incrimination prior to questioning by police. Mapp v. Ohio - CORRECT ANSWER-Evidence illegally gathered by the police may not be used in a criminal trial Terry vs. Ohio - CORRECT ANSWER-Allowed the police to stop and search a suspect if he has reasonable suspicion that the person has committed...

100% Solved Weeks v. US (1914) Exclusionary rule - warrantless seizure of items from private residence violates 4th Amendment Terry v. Ohio (1968) "Stop and Frisk" police may: - stop a person if they have reasonable suspicion that the person committed, or is about to commit, a crime - frisk the suspect for weapons if they have reasonable suspicion that the person is armed and dangerous Reasonable Suspicion a suspicion based on specific facts, training, and experience; less than ...

Mapp v. Ohio o :## A landmark case in the area of U.S. criminal procedure, in which the United States Supreme Court decided that evidence obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment protection against "unreasonable searches and seizures" may not be used in criminal prosecutions in state courts, as well as federal courts. Terry v. Ohio o :## A policeman had been undercover observing Terry and three other men who were suspected of carrying concealed weapons. Terry was arrested. Terr...

Mapp v. Ohio - correct answer federal court exclusionary rule to the states Terry v. Ohio - correct answer Creates stop and frisk Nix v. Williams - correct answer inevitable discovery Katz v. US - correct answer reasonable expectation of privacy Who investigates aliens being smuggled or trafficked or aliens engaged in narcotics trafficking, bulk cash smuggling production of counterfeit ID documentation or nation security and terrorism - correct answer Homeland Security Special Agents...