Garantie de satisfaction à 100% Disponible immédiatement après paiement En ligne et en PDF Tu n'es attaché à rien
logo-home
Assignment 5 - ANCOVA 6,99 €   Ajouter au panier

Presentation

Assignment 5 - ANCOVA

 47 vues  2 fois vendu
  • Cours
  • Établissement

Assignment 5 answers and output interpretation explained

Aperçu 4 sur 15  pages

  • 21 janvier 2022
  • 15
  • 2021/2022
  • Presentation
  • Inconnu
avatar-seller
Assignment 5: ANCOVA & Factorial Designs
(Output Interpretation Explained)


The Effects of Goal Orientation on Job Search
and Reemployment


Question 1
The researchers were interested in the effect of different workshops (Group) on job search
behavior – measured before the workshop (T0activities) as a covariate in the statistical
analysis

Why did the researchers use job sear behavior at T0 as a covariate in the statistical analysis?

1) To reduce the error variance within the group => the covariate variable accounts for
some the unexplained variance
2) To correct the effect in the model for the influence of the covariate

If assumptions are not violated => likely that adding a covariate is truly controlling for its
effect on the dependent variable (i.e., eliminates confounds)

The main research questions are:

(1) “Are unemployed job seekers who were trained in setting learning goals for their job
– more likely than others to put continued effort into job seeking, resulting in more
job search behavior?”
(2) “Is there a relationship between the type of training and finding a job – 8 weeks after
the training?”

First – differences between the different workshop were examined – with respect to job
search behavior when controlling for job search behavior at T0

Second –the proportion of people from the different workshops that had a particular
employment status at T3 was examined

,Question 2
Describe the dependent and independent variables for the above research questions:

Independent Variables

 Type of training => control, learning goal, and performance goal workshops
- Between-subject factor => different participants randomly assigned to different
categories of the IV; a participant is assigned to and experiences only one of the
three experimental conditions
- Nominal/Categorical variable => the variable has three categories, without any
intrinsic ordering of the categories
 Job Search Behavior at T0 (covariate) => examined before training begins
- Between-subject factor => participants are measured on job search behavior
prior to training (only once) and the results are compared between participants of
different groups
- Measured using 8-item index of job search activities => participants had to
indicate how much time they had spent on such activities (response options: 1=no
time at all to 5=very much time)
- Interval variable => the intervals between the values of the numerical variable are
equally spaced
 Age (covariate)
- Between-subject factor => each participant’s age was measured only once and the
ages were compared between participant
- Measured on an interval/continuous scale => we know if one participant is
older/younger than another; we can tell by how much one is older/younger than
the other
 Trait Learning Goal Orientation (covariate)
- Between-subjects variable
- Measured with a two-dimensional measure (response options: 1 = strongly
disagree to 5 = strongly agree)
- Interval variable => the intervals between the values of the numerical variable are
equally spaced
 Trait Performance Goal Orientation (covariate)
- Between-subjects variable

, - Measured with a two-dimensional measure (response options: 1 = strongly
disagree to 5 = strongly agree)
- Interval variable => the intervals between the values of the numerical variable are
equally spaced

Dependent Variables

 Job Search Behavior at T2 => examined 2 weeks following training via phone
interview
- Between-subject factor => participants are measured on job search behavior two
weeks after training (only once) and the results are compared between participants
of different groups
- Measured using 8-item index of job search activities => participants had to
indicate how much time they had spent on such activities (response options: 1=no
time at all to 5=very much time)
- Interval variable => the intervals between the values of the numerical variable are
equally spaced
 Employment Status (T3job) => measured 8 weeks after training via phone interview
- Between-subject factor => participants are measured on employment status eight
weeks after training (only once) and the results are compared between participants
of different groups
- Participants were asked whether they found a job (1 = yes, 0 = no)
- Measured on a nominal scale => there is no order and there is no distance between
yes and no

ANCOVA Test and Cross-Table

These analyses will be shown and the output interpretation will be explained following the
data screening and outlier detection.

1) ANCOVA => testing the effectiveness of the workshops with respect to job search
behavior when controlling for job search behavior at T0
2) Cross-Table – including type of training and employment status

, Question 3




The minimum statistic for T2activities => should be 1 at the lowest, since response options
range from 1 to 5

Kurtosis (the degree of presence of outliers in the distribution) => should be 3 for normal
distribution

- Low kurtosis < 3 => light tails; lack of outliers; most data points are present in
high proximity with the mean; flat distribution
- High kurtosis > 3 => heavy tails; presence of outliers; peaked distribution
 If positive => heavy-tailed; if negative => light tailed

Skewness (measure of (lack of) symmetry) => should be 0 for normal distribution

- Positive value => too many low scores; right-skewed
- Negative value => too many high scores; left-skewed

Remember:

 Standardized residuals > 3 are cause for concern
 Standardized residuals > 2.5 for more than 1% of the data are cause for concern




Case numbers 46 and 60 have a std. residuals > 2.5 and this is 2.2% of the data => cause for
concern – and Case number 47 has a std. residual > 3

Les avantages d'acheter des résumés chez Stuvia:

Qualité garantie par les avis des clients

Qualité garantie par les avis des clients

Les clients de Stuvia ont évalués plus de 700 000 résumés. C'est comme ça que vous savez que vous achetez les meilleurs documents.

L’achat facile et rapide

L’achat facile et rapide

Vous pouvez payer rapidement avec iDeal, carte de crédit ou Stuvia-crédit pour les résumés. Il n'y a pas d'adhésion nécessaire.

Focus sur l’essentiel

Focus sur l’essentiel

Vos camarades écrivent eux-mêmes les notes d’étude, c’est pourquoi les documents sont toujours fiables et à jour. Cela garantit que vous arrivez rapidement au coeur du matériel.

Foire aux questions

Qu'est-ce que j'obtiens en achetant ce document ?

Vous obtenez un PDF, disponible immédiatement après votre achat. Le document acheté est accessible à tout moment, n'importe où et indéfiniment via votre profil.

Garantie de remboursement : comment ça marche ?

Notre garantie de satisfaction garantit que vous trouverez toujours un document d'étude qui vous convient. Vous remplissez un formulaire et notre équipe du service client s'occupe du reste.

Auprès de qui est-ce que j'achète ce résumé ?

Stuvia est une place de marché. Alors, vous n'achetez donc pas ce document chez nous, mais auprès du vendeur galinajimberry. Stuvia facilite les paiements au vendeur.

Est-ce que j'aurai un abonnement?

Non, vous n'achetez ce résumé que pour 6,99 €. Vous n'êtes lié à rien après votre achat.

Peut-on faire confiance à Stuvia ?

4.6 étoiles sur Google & Trustpilot (+1000 avis)

67447 résumés ont été vendus ces 30 derniers jours

Fondée en 2010, la référence pour acheter des résumés depuis déjà 14 ans

Commencez à vendre!
6,99 €  2x  vendu
  • (0)
  Ajouter