Unit 1F - In search of the American Dream: the USA, c1917-96
Resume
Summary Theme 5 - The impact of the Reagan presidency, 1981-96 Complete Notes PDF
65 vues 0 fois vendu
Cours
Unit 1F - In search of the American Dream: the USA, c1917-96
Établissement
PEARSON (PEARSON)
The impact of the Reagan presidency, 1981-96 Complete Notes PDF provides in-depth notes for the Reagan Presidency section (Theme 5) of the Edexcel A-Level History course: In search of the American Dream: the USA c1917-96 (1F). Reagan is the focus for your source question for Paper 1 and is 1/3 of y...
Unit 1F - In search of the American Dream: the USA, c1917-96
Tous les documents sur ce sujet (86)
Vendeur
S'abonner
harrisonshaw
Avis reçus
Aperçu du contenu
Theme 5 – The impact of the Reagan presidency, 1981-96
Introduction
Reagan’s presidential goals
• Reagan won 1980 presidential election with 489 electoral college votes vs Jimmy Carter’s 49
• Promised change + to lead, not crisis manage (believed Gerald Ford + Carter had done)
• Wanted shift away from ‘Great Society’ policies of liberalism (‘weakening USA’) that encouraged reliance welfare rather than
work
• Vowed his domestic policies fix economy, lower taxes + reduce ‘big government’
Reagan wished return US to prior greatness
• Used public dissatisfaction to his advantage during presidential campaign; confidence that buoyed people 1950s gone
• Loss confidence result no. factors:
➢ Lost Vietnam War, presidency tarnished Watergate Scandal, economy decline + many crises badly dealt with by
administrations that followed Nixon (1970 oil crises)
• Many supported Reagan’s view return values individualism underpinning American Dream
Did Reagan live up to his sweeping promises and his impact up to 1996 (end Clinton’s first term)?
• Different interpretations can be advanced to answer these questions:
➢ Depends on promises under consideration, what they’re weighed against + even political point view/stance person
making assessment
➢ Time assessment made crucial: analysis impact Reagan’s presidency made after left power 1989 different from one made
now, with more knowledge longer-term effects presidency
Reaganism and Reaganomics – a new departure or reflection of the past?
• Presented himself as face of change + stark difference administrations 1960s/70s
• Many ways in which Republican gov 1980s strikingly similar Republican government of 1920s:
1) Reduction of ‘big government’: reduction interventions made by successive liberal governments since FDR, return laissez-
faire
2) Both hard line anti-union: under both administrations, union membership fell + government + many businesses portrayed
union membership ‘un-American’
➢ Aug 1981: 13,000 air traffic controllers went on strike; Reagan said strike illegal (unions people employed by fed gov
not supposed strike)
➢ Threatened fire strikers if didn’t go back work within 48hours (they didn’t) → sacked them all despite protests of
their experience
3) Both allowed creation big business corporations/monopolisation areas industry
4) Both believed significant tax reductions; both reduced top-level personal tax rates 70% → 25% + business tax
concessions → creating economies with wealth concentrated at top
5) Both gov’s new industries flourished; farming + mining suffered
6) Both encouraged financial speculation + caused stock market crashes/depression (1929 Wall Street Crash; 1987 crash +
wobble 1989)
7) Both believed ‘Rugged individualism’: creating economy where such people able flourish (Henry Ford + Bill Gates
respectively
8) Both divided poor into ‘worthy poor’ and ‘feckless’: offering help former + discouragement later
• Backlash against liberalism 1960s/70s helped Reagan to power; public feeling widespread federal expenditure social projects +
high level federal involvement state + local level ineffective + ‘un-American’
➢ Carter (liberal Democrat) seen making situation worse, economy out of control
➢ People wanted change direction, just as had 1932, when Republican policies seemed not be working
The political scene when Reagan came to power
• 1979, President Carter referred USA as having ‘malaise’, an indefinable discontent + showed in many ways
➢ 1979: public opinion poll showed, for first time, majority Americans thought children’s lives be worse than own
➢ Even during Watergate scandal, 30% people had thought that
➢ Showed people not only doubted government, they had severe doubts about future
• Carter saw this, but his answer discusses problems, appeal for austerity + collectively fix problems
➢ His outlook + speeches pessimistic. Reagan, on other hand, stressed what USA had achieved prior/what could achieve
again
➢ Reagan promised fix things: Carter’s: let’s work together to fix it’ vs Reagan’s ‘I can fix it’.
➢ Highlighted importance optimistic president for success positive public opinion’
• G. Hodgson: ‘broad + growing assumption since 1970s decline liberalism’
➢ ‘New consensus free market used describe complex phenomena + invoked propose solutions often unproved’
, ➢ ‘By 1970, huge shifts in voters’ attitudes began to attack the fundamental assumption of a welfare state’
Reagan’s beliefs
• Both Reagan + Carter committed Christians: significant amount conservative coalition support helping him to power came from
religious right
• Christians believing strongly traditional family values/compulsory prayer schools – opposed homosexuality + abortion/birth
control
➢ Reagan agreed with their beliefs + made clear of them
➢ Gave jobs within White House to religious right + attempted pass law severely restricting access abortion
➢ Combination opposition in Congress + concerns acceptability of laws meant gov not as conservative as many of religious
right would have hopes
• Many historians and political analysts have likened Reagan’s election 1980 to FDR’s election 1932, yet deeper differences
clearly at large
What effect did Reagan’s economic policies have?
Immediate action
• Policies clear: wanted to control government spending, reduce government involvement, cut taxes
➢ Influenced by ‘supply-side’ economic theories: postulates economic growth most effectively fostered by lowering taxes,
decreasing regulation, and allowing free trade to increase production/saving/investments
➢ Benefits ‘trickling down’ to all society
• Within 3 days inauguration, sacked many White House staff members + put Fed gov hiring freeze in place
➢ Told all departments freeze on office expenditure + cut travel expenses 15%
➢ Series executive orders set up new advisory groups, reporting directly to him, how cut down ‘big government’
➢ His active stance minimal financial savings + advisory groups don’t make changes/ignore advice if wished to.
• Supply side argument for cutting taxes: high tax rates arguably reason productivity fell 1970s
The plan for reform
• Reagan unconventionally wished present his entire budget policy through to 1948 as single bill to Congress 18th Feb 1981
• His Council of Economic Advisers unable follow procedures for budget planning
• Congress had to vote on whole package of spending cuts + administration approval of measures up to 1984
• Reagan’s Program for Economic Recovery (his economic strategy) presented to Congress on time + stressed importance passing
legislation quickly
Reaganomics
1) Cutting the federal deficit: accompanied by budget bill + proposal for cuts on domestic spending
➢ Aimed reduce federal deficit 22% GNP 1981 → 19% 1986
➢ Significant no. errors due to haste made, included ‘unidentified’ cuts of $78bn to be ‘decided later’
2) Personal + business tax reductions: accompanied by Economic Recovery Tax Act (ERTA) 1981
3) Deregulation: removing Fed control industry, state + local government
4) Planned control of money supply: keep inflation down while expanding economy
• Suggested cuts domestic spending almost entirely from federal grants specific projects under Johnson’s ‘Great Society’ reforms
• Included grants state + local level government bodies for slum clearance + highway repair
• Also, local initiatives education, housing + provision various services such as Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC)
programme scrapped
Getting Reagan’s Program for Economic Recovery passed
• First time decades Republican majority in Senate + almost a Republican majority in House Representatives
➢ White House only had win support 26 Democrats in House pass its legislation
• Budget became law August 1981: The Omnibus Reconciliation Act (ORA) (aims eliminate $35-45bn of federal spending)
• Senate passed tax reduction with 1 change: cut reduction personal tax 30% → 25%
➢ Democrats felt manipulated over budget + saw tax bill as fight over control of House
➢ They made significant changes to bill; White House offered tax concessions to some Democrats to swing vote
➢ Democrats counter-offered incentives areas they controlled + process became undignified scramble over concessions
• Reshaped bill eventually passed in Aug 1981 Economic Recovery Tax Act (ERTA)
1) Cut marginal income tax by 23% over 3 years + linked tax bands to inflation
➢ Applied to all tax bands, those paying higher tax benefitted most
➢ Federal individual income tax receipts 7.94% → 10% of the GDP by 1985 (never falling below 8.05% GDP)
2) Highest income tax band 70% → 50%, lowest fell 14% →11%
3) Allowed all working taxpayers to set up untaxed IRA’s (Independent Retirement Accounts)
4) Business rates cut + businesses revise depreciation costs (calculated years advance so suffered from inflation)
➢ Capital gains tax 28% →20%: Revenue increased >50% $12.5bn (1980) → >$18bn (1983).
Les avantages d'acheter des résumés chez Stuvia:
Qualité garantie par les avis des clients
Les clients de Stuvia ont évalués plus de 700 000 résumés. C'est comme ça que vous savez que vous achetez les meilleurs documents.
L’achat facile et rapide
Vous pouvez payer rapidement avec iDeal, carte de crédit ou Stuvia-crédit pour les résumés. Il n'y a pas d'adhésion nécessaire.
Focus sur l’essentiel
Vos camarades écrivent eux-mêmes les notes d’étude, c’est pourquoi les documents sont toujours fiables et à jour. Cela garantit que vous arrivez rapidement au coeur du matériel.
Foire aux questions
Qu'est-ce que j'obtiens en achetant ce document ?
Vous obtenez un PDF, disponible immédiatement après votre achat. Le document acheté est accessible à tout moment, n'importe où et indéfiniment via votre profil.
Garantie de remboursement : comment ça marche ?
Notre garantie de satisfaction garantit que vous trouverez toujours un document d'étude qui vous convient. Vous remplissez un formulaire et notre équipe du service client s'occupe du reste.
Auprès de qui est-ce que j'achète ce résumé ?
Stuvia est une place de marché. Alors, vous n'achetez donc pas ce document chez nous, mais auprès du vendeur harrisonshaw. Stuvia facilite les paiements au vendeur.
Est-ce que j'aurai un abonnement?
Non, vous n'achetez ce résumé que pour 12,99 €. Vous n'êtes lié à rien après votre achat.
