Summary Public International Law summaries + exam answer structures
79 vues 4 fois vendu
Cours
Public International Law (RGBIR50010)
Établissement
Rijksuniversiteit Groningen (RuG)
Book
Elementair Internationaal Recht 2021/Elementary International Law 2021
This document contains weekly (7) summary notes for the exam on Public International Law; covering statehood & self-determination, sources of international law, jurisdiction of states & immunities, human rights & maritime law, dispute settlement & use of force and international humanitarian and int...
Samenvatting Introduction to International & EU Law. Ik heb voor dit vak een 8.5 gehaald.
Tout pour ce livre (3)
École, étude et sujet
Rijksuniversiteit Groningen (RuG)
Rechtsgeleerdheid: Internationaal en Europees recht
Public International Law (RGBIR50010)
Tous les documents sur ce sujet (3)
Vendeur
S'abonner
vasundharasingh
Avis reçus
Aperçu du contenu
WEEK 1: Statehood & The Right to Self Determination
Concept: Statehood
Relevant law:
● Montevideo Convention Art 1 (Criteria)
○ A permanent population:
■ Permanence: does not exclude nomadic groups
● Western Sahara case: ICJ recognized the nomadic Sarahwi population
despite their seasonal movements into Morocco etc
■ Size: does not matter (e.g. Vatican City)
■ Nationality: does not matter that all/majority of people in the territory have the
same nationality.
○ A defined territory:
■ Land/not sea: Natural land (artificial land is not considered a state)
■ Defined: defined territory but defined borders are not required
■ Size: micro-states may also be admitted
■ Population: does not need to live on the territory
○ Government:
■ Exercise of governmental authority over the territory.
■ Stable and effective control
■ Form and nature: In principle, CIL does not impose requirements on types of
governance e.g. monarchy, or democracy…
○ Capacity to enter into international relations:
■ Such a capacity derives from the independence of a state i.e. not in direct or
indirect control of another state.
■ Not simply a formal criterion but also a substantive one.
● Montevideo Convention Art 3 (Recognition by other states)
○ Not included in the criteria
○ Theories:
■ Constitutive theory: Recognition is constitutive of statehood
● States decide who are states
● Problematic: international law is not a democracy, all states are sovereign
and thus recognition is not binding upon whether other states recognize a
state or not.
● Schrodinger’s cat thought experiment:
○ Application: if 100 states recognize a state but the remaining 93
don't recognize the state then the conclusion of whether a state is
a state or not is inconclusive.
■ Declaratory theory: recognition is not a requirement
● Dominant theory.
● Art 3 of the Montevideo Convention states that a state’s existence is
independent of recognition.
Nature of Montevideo Criteria:
, ● Intended to be seen in terms of the creation of a state (an entity becoming a state), does not need
to be fulfilled by an existing state i.e. continuation of existence.
○ E.g. Somalia
■ Clan dominated → although Somalia has been without an official government for
a long period of time, it is still seen as a state in the legal sense.
Concept: self-determination
Relevant law:
● Art 1(2) UN Charter: Right to self-determination
● Art 2(4) UN Charter: Territorial integrity
● Art 1 ICESCR & Art 1 ICCPR: “all people have the right to self-determination…”
● UNGA Res 1514: Self determination in the context of colonial independence:
○ Alien subjugation
○ Domination
○ Exploitation
● UNGA Res 2625:
○ Protection of territorial integrity
○ Self determination in the context of:
■ Alien subjugation
■ Domination
■ Exploitation
■ AND denial of fundamental human rights
○ Reflects CIL
● Quebec case:
○ Para 126: Distinguishes internal & external self determination
○ Seen as a source of international law but not binding upon other states (only Canada)
● Kosovo case:
○ Para 79:
■ Declarations of independence are not contrary to international law
○ ICJ did not recognize the right to unilateral secession but did not declare it prohibited
either.
Distinguishing internal & external self determination:
● Internal self-determination:
○ Allowing different groups of people the equal right to participate in the internal politics
of a state without discrimination.
○ Internal self-determination is to be implemented internally, without entitling the people to
its own, independent state.
● External self determination:
○ Establishment of a sovereign and independent state (Quebec case p126)
○ The principle of self determination would enable a people to separate from a state only in
exceptional circumstances.
○ This right has only been bestowed on 2 classes of people (Quebec case p131-134):
■ Those under colonial rule
, ■ Those under foreign occupation
○ UNGA Res 2625 also adds: denial of fundamental human rights.
Remedial secession:
● However a 3rd circumstance has been described (Quebec case p131-134):
○ When a people is blocked from the meaningful exercise of its right to self-determination
internally → it is entitled as a last resort by secession (remedial secession).
Territorial integrity:
● Outside the above contexts, external self determination is not allowed.
● UNGA Res 2625 → highlights the principle of territorial integrity.
Answer structure:
● Outline relevant law for right to self determination
○ Art 1(2) UN Charter: Right to self-determination
○ Art 1 ICESCR & Art 1 ICCPR: “all people have the right to self-determination…”
● Distinguish between internal and external self-determination.
● In what situations does external self-determination arise?
○ UNGA Res 1514: Self determination in the context of colonial independence:
■ Alien subjugation
■ Domination
■ Exploitation
○ UNGA Res 2625: Self determination in the context of:
■ Alien subjugation
■ Domination
■ Exploitation
■ AND denial of fundamental human rights
○ Quebec case:
■ Those under Colonial rule
■ Those under foreign occupation
■ 3rd circumstance as a last resort - Remedial secession: When a people is blocked
from the meaningful exercise of its right to self-determination internally → it is
entitled as a last resort by secession (remedial secession).
● An expression of the will to the right to self determination must be expressed through a
declaration of independence:
○ Western Sahara case
■ Para 55:
● “The application of the right of self-determination requires a free and
genuine expression of the will of the peoples concerned”
● Is remedial secession allowed?
○ Maybe:
■ Kosovo:
● Para 79:
, ○ Notes that unilateral declarations of independence in themselves
are not prohibited.
● Para 80:
○ Does not recognise the right to remedial secession but does not
prohibit it either.
○ No:
■ UNGA Res 2625:
● Principle of territorial integrity cannot be violated.
WEEK 2: Sources of international law
Topic: Sources of international law
Relevant law:
● Art 38(1) ICJ Statute
Nature of art 38(1) ICJ statute:
● No such hierarchy between the 3 primary sources (treaties, custom and general principles) but
they do take precedence over subsidiary means (judicial decisions + opinions of scholars)
● If a conflict emerges between applicable legal rules - resolved on the basis of lex specialis and les
posterior.
Concept: Treaties
Relevant law:
● VCLT
Nature of VCLT:
● 116 Ratifications (not the most widely ratified)
● VCLT reflects CIL
● Art 2(1)(a): Definition of a treaty
○ “‘Treaty’ means an international agreement concluded between States in written form and
governed by international law, whether embodied in a single instrument or in two or more
related instruments and whatever its particular designation”.
○ Thus the requirements are:
■ International agreement
■ Between states
■ In written form
■ Governed by international law
● Art 7: Negotiation
● Art 11: Consent to be bound
○ Prerequisite for entry into force
○ However, even when a state consents to a treaty does not mean it is immediately binding
○ Usually becomes binding when a treaty is signed & then expressed consent to be bound
through ratification.
Les avantages d'acheter des résumés chez Stuvia:
Qualité garantie par les avis des clients
Les clients de Stuvia ont évalués plus de 700 000 résumés. C'est comme ça que vous savez que vous achetez les meilleurs documents.
L’achat facile et rapide
Vous pouvez payer rapidement avec iDeal, carte de crédit ou Stuvia-crédit pour les résumés. Il n'y a pas d'adhésion nécessaire.
Focus sur l’essentiel
Vos camarades écrivent eux-mêmes les notes d’étude, c’est pourquoi les documents sont toujours fiables et à jour. Cela garantit que vous arrivez rapidement au coeur du matériel.
Foire aux questions
Qu'est-ce que j'obtiens en achetant ce document ?
Vous obtenez un PDF, disponible immédiatement après votre achat. Le document acheté est accessible à tout moment, n'importe où et indéfiniment via votre profil.
Garantie de remboursement : comment ça marche ?
Notre garantie de satisfaction garantit que vous trouverez toujours un document d'étude qui vous convient. Vous remplissez un formulaire et notre équipe du service client s'occupe du reste.
Auprès de qui est-ce que j'achète ce résumé ?
Stuvia est une place de marché. Alors, vous n'achetez donc pas ce document chez nous, mais auprès du vendeur vasundharasingh. Stuvia facilite les paiements au vendeur.
Est-ce que j'aurai un abonnement?
Non, vous n'achetez ce résumé que pour 8,99 €. Vous n'êtes lié à rien après votre achat.
