Garantie de satisfaction à 100% Disponible immédiatement après paiement En ligne et en PDF Tu n'es attaché à rien
logo-home
Educ 750 Research Critique quantitative Analysis 5,39 €   Ajouter au panier

Dissertation

Educ 750 Research Critique quantitative Analysis

1 vérifier
 14 vues  1 fois vendu
  • Cours
  • Établissement

Educ 750 Research Critique quantitative Analysis

Aperçu 1 sur 4  pages

  • 9 janvier 2024
  • 4
  • 2023/2024
  • Dissertation
  • Inconnu
  • A+

1  vérifier

review-writer-avatar

Par: kmorrismscs • 2 semaines de cela

avatar-seller
QUANTITATIVE CRITIQUE 1


Research Critique: Quantitative
This is a critique of "Personalized professional learning and teacher self-efficacy for
integrating technology in K–12 classrooms," a quantitative research study by Hall and
Trespalacios (2019). This critique will showcase a summary and critical analysis of the research
study. Additionally, it will present a discussion of the research study based on the insight it
provides and its relation to my professional experiences as an educator.

Summary
This summary will showcase the research study's purpose and participants/samples.
Additionally, it would explore the research design incorporated in the study, along with the
methods of data collection and analysis. Lastly, this summary section will explain the study's
results and findings.
Purpose
The purpose of the study conducted by Hall and Trespalacios (2019) was to explore the
effects of personalized learning on educators' comfort levels and their confidence in self-efficacy
regarding information and communications technology (ICT). Based on the purpose of the study,
the authors focused on professional development, particularly for technology, with the argument
that this factor significantly influences the implementation of ICT in the classroom. Therefore,
this study was piloted by two key research questions; "Did the PPL program significantly
improve teachers’ perceptions of their ICT skills?" and "Did the PPL program significantly
improve teachers’ self-efficacy toward the integration of ICT?" (Hall & Trespalacios, 2019).
Participants/Sample
The participants of the study included 19 schools, where 418 teachers participated in the
program of study. Among these teachers, 247 (59%) completed the pre- and post-program
surveys. Additionally, Among the 247 teachers, 50.4% and 49.6% were enrolled in the
Integrating Technology into Instruction (ITI) program and Personalizing Learning through
Technology (PLT) program, respectively.
Research Design
The study used a longitudinal research design. The authors incorporated a survey, which
focuses on tracking teachers' perceptions of their self-efficacy and technology skills in relation to
using technology after and before the program. Therefore, the authors sought to find the
correlation between teachers' professional learning experiences and their self-efficacy or
confidence toward technology.
Method of Data Collection
The data collected in this research study consisted of surveys, particularly a "voluntary
Likert scale self-assessment survey of self-efficacy questions" (Hall & Trespalacios, 2019, p.
226). Therefore, educators who participated in the programs were requested to voluntarily
participate in pre-and post-surveys. These surveys primarily focused on the teachers' technology
skills and their self-efficacy while using technology for learning. The authors distributed the
surveys using a Google Form in the Canvas learning management systems, given that it was a
component in the ITI and PLT programs.
Method of Analysis
Concerning the methods of analysis, the researchers utilized two forms of analysis. They
ran paired-samples t-tests and descriptive statistics. These methods of analysis were used to
measure the differentiation, whether existing, in ICT skills and self-efficacy towards the
integration of ICT at the beginning and end of the program.

Les avantages d'acheter des résumés chez Stuvia:

Qualité garantie par les avis des clients

Qualité garantie par les avis des clients

Les clients de Stuvia ont évalués plus de 700 000 résumés. C'est comme ça que vous savez que vous achetez les meilleurs documents.

L’achat facile et rapide

L’achat facile et rapide

Vous pouvez payer rapidement avec iDeal, carte de crédit ou Stuvia-crédit pour les résumés. Il n'y a pas d'adhésion nécessaire.

Focus sur l’essentiel

Focus sur l’essentiel

Vos camarades écrivent eux-mêmes les notes d’étude, c’est pourquoi les documents sont toujours fiables et à jour. Cela garantit que vous arrivez rapidement au coeur du matériel.

Foire aux questions

Qu'est-ce que j'obtiens en achetant ce document ?

Vous obtenez un PDF, disponible immédiatement après votre achat. Le document acheté est accessible à tout moment, n'importe où et indéfiniment via votre profil.

Garantie de remboursement : comment ça marche ?

Notre garantie de satisfaction garantit que vous trouverez toujours un document d'étude qui vous convient. Vous remplissez un formulaire et notre équipe du service client s'occupe du reste.

Auprès de qui est-ce que j'achète ce résumé ?

Stuvia est une place de marché. Alors, vous n'achetez donc pas ce document chez nous, mais auprès du vendeur balaywriters. Stuvia facilite les paiements au vendeur.

Est-ce que j'aurai un abonnement?

Non, vous n'achetez ce résumé que pour 5,39 €. Vous n'êtes lié à rien après votre achat.

Peut-on faire confiance à Stuvia ?

4.6 étoiles sur Google & Trustpilot (+1000 avis)

67474 résumés ont été vendus ces 30 derniers jours

Fondée en 2010, la référence pour acheter des résumés depuis déjà 14 ans

Commencez à vendre!
5,39 €  1x  vendu
  • (1)
  Ajouter