Garantie de satisfaction à 100% Disponible immédiatement après paiement En ligne et en PDF Tu n'es attaché à rien
logo-home
Depression Part 2 Complete Summary - 3.4 Affective Disorders 2024 8,99 €   Ajouter au panier

Resume

Depression Part 2 Complete Summary - 3.4 Affective Disorders 2024

 9 vues  0 fois vendu
  • Cours
  • Établissement

Complete and extensive summary for week 2 of the course 3.4 Affective Disorders, year 2023/2024. Grade received = 8.3!

Aperçu 4 sur 42  pages

  • 12 mars 2024
  • 42
  • 2023/2024
  • Resume
avatar-seller
3.4 Affective Disorders
Week 2




Depression Part 2

,Sex Differences in Depression
Kendler & Gardner (2014)

Sex Differences in the Pathways to Major Depression: A Study of
Opposite-Sex Twin Pairs
Introduction
● Women have a consistently higher rate of MDD than men
● Etiological pathways for this finding have been explored in previous research (single
risk factors)
○ Marital status/quality
○ Stressful life events
○ Prior anxiety disorders
○ Personality
○ Ruminative propensity
● Because of the genetic and environmental familial factors in MDD, delineating risk
factors that differentiate sexes would be facilitated if there was a design controlling
for sex differences
○ This study → co-twin control design in opposite-sex dizygotic twin pairs (optimal
sample for studying sex differences)

Method
● Sample
○ Started with 9.400 individuals that were twins from Virginia (1940-1974)
○ Final interview 1.000 participants at around 37 years of age
● Outcome variable
○ Participants were asked about the occurrence of 15 DSM-III symptoms for an
MDD in the past year
● Model variables
○ Five developmental periods
■ Childhood → familial risk, low parental warmth, sexual abuse, parental
loss
■ Early adolescence → neuroticism, low self-esteem, early-onset anxiety,
conduct disorder
■ Late adolescence → low educational achievement, lifetime traumas,
nicotine dependence, alcohol and drug use disorders
■ Adulthood → divorce, past history of MDD, low social support
■ Past year → marital satisfaction, distal stressful life events, dependent
proximal and independent proximal stressful life events
● Statistical methods

, ○ Divided into 2 groups so that one member of each pair was present in each
group
○ Genetic and environmental influences were balanced across groups

Results
● General
○ 837/1057 participants had no episodes of MDD in the past year
○ In 12 pairs both members had MDD in the past year
○ Of the 208 with MDD in the past year 62% was female
○ Paths were estimated using statistical software (best fit model)
○ Three levels of analysis on sex differences in individual paths, all outflow paths
from risk variables, total effect of risk variables on liability to MDD
● Individual paths
○ Some individual paths had strong sex differences
○ Stronger in males
■ Childhood sexual abuse to conduct disorder and early onset anxiety
disorder (0.41 vs 0.12)
■ Drug use disorders to distal and dependent proximal stressful life events
(0.16 vs 0)
■ Dependent proximal life events to past year MDD (0.37 vs 0.24)
○ Stronger in females
■ Low parental warmth to early onset anxiety disorders and prior history of
MDD (0.07 vs 0)
■ Low marital satisfaction and social support to past year MDD (0.20 vs 0)
● Risk factors → outflow
○ Low parental warmth, parental loss, lifetime traumas, neuroticism, divorce, social
support, marital satisfaction contribute more strongly to the MDD pathway for
females
○ Low self-esteem, drug use disorder, past history of MDD, distal and dependent
proximal stressful life events contribute more strongly to MDD pathway in
males
● Risk factors → total direct & indirect paths to MDD
○ Compared risk factor severity of sex differences → minimal (<0.02), modest,
moderate, strong sex differences
○ Three variables with modest differences (0.02-0.05)
■ Stronger effect on females (1) → parental warmth
■ Stronger effect on males (2) → childhood sexual abuse & past history of
MDD
○ Four variables with moderate differences (0.05-0.10)
■ Stronger effect on females (2) → neuroticism & divorce
■ Stronger effect on males (2) → conduct disorder & drug use disorder
○ Four variables with strong differences (>0.10)
■ Stronger effect on females (2) → social support & marital satisfaction

, ■ Stronger effect on males (2) → distal & dependent proximal stressful life
events
● Specific classes of stressful life events
○ Three event categories had largest differences in effect size
■ For males most effects → financial problems, work problems, legal
problems
○ For females most effects → relationship problems, serious illnesses in close
social network

Discussion
● Findings of risk factors are consistent with other findings, especially neuroticism
● Support for women being more affected by problems in social network
● Six men risk factors this study found can be divided into 3 (previously established by
research) groups
○ Externalizing psychopathology → drug abuse
○ Prior depressive history → history of MDD
○ Greater sensitivity to specific stressors → childhood sexual abuse, stressful
life events
● Men more likely to be more emotionally involved in occupational & financial
success
● Some findings not consistent with prior research (eg divorce more effects on women)
● These findings not directly comparable to previous studies → complex model
● Findings are congruent with psychoanalytic model by Blatt → cognitive-behavioral,
attachment & interpersonal personal perspective
○ MDD has two forms → anaclictic (deficiencies in caring relationships & unmet
dependency needs) & introjective (inability to meet internal demands for
self-worth & achievement)
○ Males more likely to suffer from introjective & females more likely to suffer from
anaclictic
● Limitations
○ Assumption of causal relationships between predictors & dependent variables
(these variables could have all different types of relationships, probably
reciprocal)
○ Some risk factors were assessed using long term memory and may have been
influenced by recall bias
○ Assumption that multiple independent variables act additively & linearly in
their impact on risk for MDD → unlikely to be true
○ Sample was limited to adult white twins from Virginia

Les avantages d'acheter des résumés chez Stuvia:

Qualité garantie par les avis des clients

Qualité garantie par les avis des clients

Les clients de Stuvia ont évalués plus de 700 000 résumés. C'est comme ça que vous savez que vous achetez les meilleurs documents.

L’achat facile et rapide

L’achat facile et rapide

Vous pouvez payer rapidement avec iDeal, carte de crédit ou Stuvia-crédit pour les résumés. Il n'y a pas d'adhésion nécessaire.

Focus sur l’essentiel

Focus sur l’essentiel

Vos camarades écrivent eux-mêmes les notes d’étude, c’est pourquoi les documents sont toujours fiables et à jour. Cela garantit que vous arrivez rapidement au coeur du matériel.

Foire aux questions

Qu'est-ce que j'obtiens en achetant ce document ?

Vous obtenez un PDF, disponible immédiatement après votre achat. Le document acheté est accessible à tout moment, n'importe où et indéfiniment via votre profil.

Garantie de remboursement : comment ça marche ?

Notre garantie de satisfaction garantit que vous trouverez toujours un document d'étude qui vous convient. Vous remplissez un formulaire et notre équipe du service client s'occupe du reste.

Auprès de qui est-ce que j'achète ce résumé ?

Stuvia est une place de marché. Alors, vous n'achetez donc pas ce document chez nous, mais auprès du vendeur lindej03. Stuvia facilite les paiements au vendeur.

Est-ce que j'aurai un abonnement?

Non, vous n'achetez ce résumé que pour 8,99 €. Vous n'êtes lié à rien après votre achat.

Peut-on faire confiance à Stuvia ?

4.6 étoiles sur Google & Trustpilot (+1000 avis)

67232 résumés ont été vendus ces 30 derniers jours

Fondée en 2010, la référence pour acheter des résumés depuis déjà 14 ans

Commencez à vendre!
8,99 €
  • (0)
  Ajouter