Samenvatting
Samenvatting sociale deel SOTA Inequality And Social Exclusion
- Instelling
- Universiteit Antwerpen (UA)
Samenvatting sociale deel SOTA Inequality And Social Exclusion - slides + eigen notities
[Meer zien]Voorbeeld 4 van de 56 pagina's
Voorbeeld 4 van de 56 pagina's
In winkelwagenVoorbeeld van de inhoud
Social exclusion (sociologische deel) 2019-2020lesnotities
LES 1 ON SOCIAL EXCLUSION, INEQUALITY AND POVERTY: A CONCEPTUAL EXPLORATION
Social exclusion: a polysemic concept
History of a concept
• origins of concept in France in 1970s
• used to refer to social categories unprotected by the welfare state (low educated,…)
• social insurance against predictable risks of ‘standard’ family
→ assumptions about how people lived → in standardized families + were abled
+ had work → but not valid for everybody and those are then excluded.
• concept expanded and changed in response to social and political crises (more
categories were discovered that fell out of the welfare state (bv. migrants,
youngsters,….)
• spread across Europe from late 1980s onwards (e.g. EU policy documents)
• In 1970 highdays of the welfare state they believed that poverty would disappear →
someone noticed that despite this, there were categories that were not protected! If
you could not contribute, you were not protected.
A polysemic concept:
• Social exclusion= a polysemic concept= it has multiple meanings
• problem for comparison → bv. How many people were excluded in the 1970’s
compared to now?
• ….but also opportunity to learn about different ‘realities’
• informed by political ideologies and associated social science paradigms → bv. Marx
was a scientist but also had a political ideology.
• source to capture complexity of actually existing social exclusion
Three paradigms
• exclusion refers to changing nature of social disadvantage
→ exclusion from what? ... social order
→ different modes of social integration:
➢ externally imposed bv. The police
➢ voluntary interaction between individuals bv. In de les de prof
gehoorzamen omdat je iets wilt bijleren.
➢ national cultural and value consensus bv. Mutual respect → they are
shared and do not need to be said explicitly.
➢ … identify different causes for social exclusion
→ If you know what mode of integration is dominant in a place, you know what kind
of social exclusion there is.
1
,Social exclusion (sociologische deel) 2019-2020
lesnotities
1. Solidarity paradigm
• rooted in French Republican tradition
• social integration through cultural boundaries and group solidarity
• solidarity is social bond between society and individual nurtured through a collective
conscience (=shared values) and tied together through institutions
• state (Republic) promises citizens subsistence and right to work
• in return citizens participate in work and public life
• exclusion occurs when cultural bond breaks down and individuals are no longer
morally integrated in society’s institutions.
→ Bv. In Frankrijk heftig hoofddoeken debat want hoofddoek zou aantonen dat men
niet bij de groep wilt horen. = cultural subcommunities are seen as problematic.
2. Specialisation paradigm
• associated with Anglosaxon liberalism
• social order network of voluntary exchange and association between autonomous
individuals with own interests → pursuing your self-interest → bv. Als een
hoofddoek dragen uw keuze is = oke.
• leads to specialised, interdependent and competing groups and social structures
• exclusion as discrimination; when group boundaries impede individual freedom to
participate in social exchanges. = when free choice is taken away.
• exclusion is individual process of ‘disaffiliation’ from social and economic networks
• rights to social insurance legitimated on basis of contributions made during
employment (social liberalism – social contract) = voluntary contributing is a social
contract to be protected when situations occur.
3. Monopoly paradigm
• associated with social democracy
• social order coercive, imposed through hierarchical power relations
• exclusion as result of ‘social closure’, when institutional and cultural boundaries not
only keep others out against their will but also serve to perpetuate inequality.
→ As a group, closing recources off for other people = exclusion.
→ Vb. dokwerker: they are usually male, low-skilled and white
You need to de qualified (certified), so not all people without a job can just go
work at the doks = monopolisation = exlusion
→ The only way to break through this monomolisation is with power and coercion.
• labour market segmentation bv. Males in high jobs.
Defining the concept: from social difference to social exclusion
• social exlcusion starts from social difference bv. Income, gender, age
• from social difference to social exclusion→ two general social processes:
1. hierarchisation of social positions → bv. Male more important then female,…
2. development of fault lines → segregation bv. In bathrooms, gay bars,..
2
,Social exclusion (sociologische deel) 2019-2020
lesnotities
and … poverty (= a specific part of social exclusion)
→ but a social difference can also be irrelevant to exlcusion such as eye color.
Fault lines?
= fault lines are gaps or ‘sudden discontinuities’
→ different types of fault lines:
o social-relational fault lines, e.g. isolation from
certain social networks
o social-economic fault lines, e.g. segmentation of
labour markets
o spatial fault lines, e.g. ghetto’s, gated communities,
low mobility, core-periphery
o institutional fault lines, e.g. lack of accessibility to certain institutions
o cultural fault lines, e.g. ethnic-cultural boundaries between groups
Social differentiation
• No hierarchical ordering of social positions, no fault lines (eye color)
• infinite differentiation, most of which does not acquire socially significance
• social differentiation does not automatically lead to social inequality
Social fragmentation
Non-hierarchical relations, but fault lines
→ Examples:
o ‘Genuine’ multicultural society’
o Polycentric city
o Subcultures
Social inequality
• Hierarchical relations but no fault lines
• Differential access to valued resources
• Main parameters:
o overall amount of inequality
o rigidity
o ascription (vs achievement)
o crystallization
3
, Social exclusion (sociologische deel) 2019-2020
lesnotities
Social exclusion
• Hierarchical organisation of social positions and separation by fault lines
→ social exclusion seen from different paradigms:
o solidarity paradigm: from shared culture and norms, embodied in public
institutions – stresses fault lines and may even establish cultural hierarchies
o monopoly paradigm: from access to valuable resources and political rights,
through social closure– stresses hierarchical organisation of social positions
and fault lines
o specialisation paradigm: from freely entering in relationship with people or
becoming member of social group– stresses illegitimate effect of hierarchies,
but does not question fault lines (if result of free choice)
• social exclusion according to monopoly: paradigm closest to mainstream in social
stratification, i.e. sociological approach of inequality = closest to sociology.
→ Many sociologists attentive to role of structural power in society and how it plays
out in multiple societal domains (social, cultural, economic and political sphere).
→ Social inequality takes on a group form (e.g. class, gender, ethnicity, etc.).
→No seamless and continuous distribution of incomes but ‘institutionalized groups’
with pre-packaged combinations of valued goods.
Poverty
Defining poverty as a form of social exclusion
→ no mention of income in this definition!
→ People are poor when they are excluded on several points in their life
→ Relationship between the poor and the rest of society
→ Structural intervention is needed bv. Minimun income.
4
Voordelen van het kopen van samenvattingen bij Stuvia op een rij:
√ Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews
Stuvia-klanten hebben meer dan 700.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet je zeker dat je de beste documenten koopt!
Snel en makkelijk kopen
Je betaalt supersnel en eenmalig met iDeal, Bancontact of creditcard voor de samenvatting. Zonder lidmaatschap.
Focus op de essentie
Samenvattingen worden geschreven voor en door anderen. Daarom zijn de samenvattingen altijd betrouwbaar en actueel. Zo kom je snel tot de kern!
Veelgestelde vragen
Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?
Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.
Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?
Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.
Van wie koop ik deze samenvatting?
Stuvia is een marktplaats, je koop dit document dus niet van ons, maar van verkoper ranivanderlinden. Stuvia faciliteert de betaling aan de verkoper.
Zit ik meteen vast aan een abonnement?
Nee, je koopt alleen deze samenvatting voor €5,99. Je zit daarna nergens aan vast.
Is Stuvia te vertrouwen?
4,6 sterren op Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
Afgelopen 30 dagen zijn er 48072 samenvattingen verkocht
Opgericht in 2010, al 15 jaar dé plek om samenvattingen te kopen