I got a 20/20 with my summaries
Abbreviations:
DRTR: divine right to rule
E-G: Estates-General
CC: Catholic Church
AR: Ancien regime
DL: Germany (Deutschland)
WS: Welfare state
SD: Social democracy
SDs: social democrats
CDs: Christian democrats
O1H: on the one hand
OOH: on the other...
8: Culture and secularisation
Content:
1. Secularisation
1.1. Modernity and the secular
1.2. Revisions to secularisation theory
1.3. Secularism as a political project
2. Cultural changes
2.1. Nationalism and the sacralisation of ‘the people’
2.2. Industrialisation and the commercialisation of the arts
2.3. Birth of mass consumer culture
2.4. A plurality of artistic styles
1. Secularisation
● Defining secularisation:
= a process of differentiating religious and secular spheres of life; accompanied by widespread acceptance
of the relativism of people’s beliefs.
2nd sphere that is in essence not religious - a sphere of social, political, economic life, a sphere of interaction
that doesn’t predominantly gravitate around one’s religious identity.
Crucial differentiation - until C19: close interrelationship between king and church; close intermingling of
worldly affairs and religious practice.
(esp. In Fr - kings anointed by the Pope)
Over the course of the 19C - process of differentiation between the two.
Differentiation between the religious parts of our life and the ‘state’/between public and private life.
Still being a religious person but accepting that another might hold different beliefs. ==> process of relativism.
● ‘Secular’ means not spiritual, not sacred, not religious.
● Latin ‘saeculum’: an ‘age’/’the world’
○ Used to differentiate an enclosed clergy (monastic priests) from a secular clergy (those serving
the parish, being ‘out of the world’).
○ How the opposites religious - secular came to be:
■ Enclosed clergy - withdraw from society to practice their religion.
■ Secular clergy - priests not in a monastery, but living in society, in a
community/parish.
○ ‘Secular’ used increasingly to refer to a lifestyle that is at odds with God (differentiation civil -
religious law).
● Secularisation thesis = the claim that religion is declining in importance.
+ That this is the result of modernisation (processes) - rationalisation, indn, urbanisation. - linking it to
C19.
Secularisation: two main theses
1) Disappearance thesis
● Modernity brings about the “death of religion”.
○ With all its processes.
● The significance of religion for society and individuals will decrease until it disappears.
2) Differentiation thesis / aka ‘privatisation’ thesis
● Not a general decline in religiosity but a decline in the social significance of religion.
○ Not that individuals are becoming less religious/religion is less important to them, but that
religion as a social practice/mechanism that ties people together and that they centerstage in
interaction is declining.
● Two main causes
, ○ Institutional differentiation: religion is no longer a force permeating society as a whole, but
displanted to a sphere of its own; the economy, political and legal institutions become
autonomous.
■ Level of autonomy they lacked in AR.
■ It’s especially with the development of the N-S, (19C particularly) modern states, that
religion is pushed back.
■ No longer interrelated to the fabric of the state, but given its own sphere.
○ Disenchantment: reluctance to accept explanations referring to forces outside this world.
■ As a result of rationalisation - become more critical - and urbanisation - people leaving
their traditional societies and => also their traditions behind.
■ People asking for practical answers.
As a result of these 2 causes:
● Religion becomes a private matter: can still remain significant for individual people. } as a result of
another differentiation between the public and the private sphere.
Due to the creation of modern states that creates an institutional differentiation, claiming a sphere of their
own/their own autonomy, => they build their own institutions and keep them separate from religious ones:
building own bureaucracies, public schools to educate citizens to the benefits of the modern state.
==> Religion doesn't disappear, is not seen as an impossible match with processes of institutional
differentiation. → the claim is more modest: privatisation, not disappearance.
==> Loses its significance as a form of social glue.
(due to privatisation/differentiation)
Nietzche - death of religion, “God is dead”
1.1. Secularisation and modernisation
Secularisation theory derives mainly from sociological work of the 1960s.
● 1960s authors published various interpretations of foundational sociological theory that explored the
link between Western modernisation and the decline of traditional religions.
● Max Weber: Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism
○ One of the key foundational work that is being re-read and re-interpreted in the 60s.
(+ Durkheim)
Theorists (sociological ones in particular) are developing arguments for the disappearance thesis by relying
heavily on Weber’s writings.
Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism:
- Focuses on the unique features of Western historical development.
- Argues that these features can never literally be repeated elsewhere - it’s a specific case study.
- Yet, suggests that comparable forms of rationalisation might occur within different regional and
religious traditions.
→ His case study is being re-interpreted in the 1960s as suggesting that secularisation in Europe can also take
place elsewhere.
Weber argued that after the Protestant Reformation, a specific form of Christian Protestantism - Calvinism -
encouraged a different attitude to work, which had far-reaching effects.
- Belief in predestination → a precise number of souls would go to heaven, had places reserved by God.
- Most Calvinists were terrified that there was no seat waiting for them; were always on the
lookout for signs of Godly favor.
- One clear sign of Godly favor was their active contribution to the community through their work.
- Weber: The Calvinist need to reassure themselves through their industry was an important factor in
the growth of capitalism in Northern Europe. They built up businesses that generated wealth.
- But they lived thrifty lives → reinvested surplus and so helped fuel capitalism.
Voordelen van het kopen van samenvattingen bij Stuvia op een rij:
√ Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews
Stuvia-klanten hebben meer dan 700.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet je zeker dat je de beste documenten koopt!
Snel en makkelijk kopen
Je betaalt supersnel en eenmalig met iDeal, Bancontact of creditcard voor de samenvatting. Zonder lidmaatschap.
Focus op de essentie
Samenvattingen worden geschreven voor en door anderen. Daarom zijn de samenvattingen altijd betrouwbaar en actueel. Zo kom je snel tot de kern!
Veelgestelde vragen
Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?
Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.
Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?
Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.
Van wie koop ik deze samenvatting?
Stuvia is een marktplaats, je koop dit document dus niet van ons, maar van verkoper emmamarchal. Stuvia faciliteert de betaling aan de verkoper.
Zit ik meteen vast aan een abonnement?
Nee, je koopt alleen deze samenvatting voor €4,29. Je zit daarna nergens aan vast.
