100% tevredenheidsgarantie Direct beschikbaar na betaling Zowel online als in PDF Je zit nergens aan vast
logo-home
samenvatting Advertising €4,99   In winkelwagen

Samenvatting

samenvatting Advertising

1 beoordeling
 109 keer bekeken  8 keer verkocht

Het is een samenvatting van het keuzevak advertising. Het bevat de inhoud van de slides en mijn persoonlijke notities.

Voorbeeld 4 van de 86  pagina's

  • 3 december 2022
  • 86
  • 2022/2023
  • Samenvatting
Alle documenten voor dit vak (4)

1  beoordeling

review-writer-avatar

Door: J24 • 1 jaar geleden

avatar-seller
louisa-marievandenheede
Advertising
- 50% of advertising has an effect
- There is big crisis, and it also affects the
advertising industry → not yet but next
year
- How is this possible?
- A brand has an agency who makes ads,
and they want them on a screen
- But in between there is another player:
the person who sells ad places → they
have to buy them one year in advance
- Fake news gets sponsored because it
gets a lot of eyeballs




MarCom Mini Course




Marcom: you want about products, brands, organisations

Above-the-line: if a major bransds asks advertisingagent for 1 million they can built it for half of the
money (the most of the oney goes to adplacement and not admaking)

Below-the-line: they ask you want you want and then say how much it costs (price depending
whether they like the job or not)

→ Many other people involved

Many agencies say they do all 365 agencies, but they like above-the-line more

Pop marketing= point of purchase happens in the shop and online

Sales: you tell your salespeople what to say (they will do it in their own way but still sent the same
message)

Earend media: influencers who will promote things in the hope they will get sponsered

1

,Short term elasticity= korte basis winst je geeft 1 dollar en krijgt het terug in iets anders

MarCom stakeholder group


Advertisers want to persuade consumers and need
“media” to reach them. Media need advertisers for
revenue.

Tensions/actions from one group can affect both other
groups (e.g. dissatisfied customer can blame the medium
and/or the advertiser




➔ A lot of the times it works with more stakeholder (advertising agencies), probably around 4

- Consumers: we want information/entertainment
- Advertisers: we don’t like al the ads, but they do inspire us
- Media: want consumers, the consumers they have the more they can charge the advertisers



MarCom, branding, campaigns

BRANDING

A long-term strategic perspective on how to build, grow and maintain your brand value. MarCom
should always serve the brand strategy

CAMPAIGN

A strategically planned chronology and collection of MarComs with a common creative appeal and an
appropriate communication strategy and budget planning per medium



MarCom dynamics: reach vs relevance
➔ Cf. Elaboration Likelihood Model & System1/System2

REACH

- Hardly noticed peripheral cues affect us, certainly when repeated over and over again
(Sharp: “distinctive assests” + “constant availability”)
- Reach: as many as people you can reach and as many times that you can (like taglines, if it is
a good one it will become more familiar)




2

,RELEVANCE

- The best way to make consumers attentive of your message is to make it relevant. This will
make them cognitively involved in the message
- Relevance: can be for many reasons, (if he would now hand out vouchers for a coffeeshop
nearby it would be relevance but if the coffeeshop is far away it would not be interesting




➔ The more reach you have the higher the line would be


Solid advice based on ELM: There are two important pitfalls, one for each of the main MarCom
strategies

1. When aiming for eyeballs, you are typically satisfied with low involvement, peripheral
processing. Do not forget to use appropriate peripheral cues to lift your ad effect.

2. When aiming for relevance, you’ll use all kinds of tricks to increase the odds of high
involvement, central processing. Do not forget to make sure the attitude effect is positive.


95% of MarCom is Reach (80%) vs Relevance (15%)*
- Media cost: Higher reach or higher relevance per reach = more expensive
o Advertising has a cost per exposure (vb. 10 000 people)
- Most “new” media start from the relevance position (e.g. content marketing on Facebook
with organic reach) and, if succesful they then change into reach media (Facebook turned
into a big traditional ad platform) Brands typically evolve from relevance-based niche players
to reach-based big companies
o Relevence-based to reach-based : If they sell a good thing the customers will
advertise for them but when they have grown to big for that they will change to
reach-based
- MarCom objectives: a lot of reach (recall, TOMA, visits, …) and a bit of relevance (WOM,
loyalty, …), usually structured in cognitive – attitudes – behavior




3

, TRAIN YOURSELF
When confronted with a (new) MarCom example:

1. Categorize Paid – Owned – Earned costs and potential

2. Analyze the degree of reach and relevance it has

3. Compare this with potential MarCom objectives (cognition, attitude, behavior)

4. Evaluate how much it makes sense



The “theory” behind advertising
Early models explaining advertising effects:

Hierarchy of effects:

- Linear evolution from cognitive over affective to behavioral
effects
o Examples: AIDA, DAGMAR, …
- Wider parts = more people - mass media
- Later refined into different hierarchies such as the Foote-Cone-
Belding grid
- Funnel metaphor still used extensively
o They all have a funnel metaphor
o You have a lot of reach and then you have relevance,
so you start with a lot of people and you lose people
along the way

- Can partly explain the continued focus on EYEBALLSas a
MarCom goal



HoE models …

- … are still useful as a media mix metaphor

- … have little proven academic value

- … are still used, sometimes, because they are easy to sell

Academically, replaced by attitude models where all advertising effects are usually centered on
persuasion and attitudes (or CBBE): Elaboration Likelihood Model




4

Voordelen van het kopen van samenvattingen bij Stuvia op een rij:

√  	Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews

√ Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews

Stuvia-klanten hebben meer dan 700.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet je zeker dat je de beste documenten koopt!

Snel en makkelijk kopen

Snel en makkelijk kopen

Je betaalt supersnel en eenmalig met iDeal, Bancontact of creditcard voor de samenvatting. Zonder lidmaatschap.

Focus op de essentie

Focus op de essentie

Samenvattingen worden geschreven voor en door anderen. Daarom zijn de samenvattingen altijd betrouwbaar en actueel. Zo kom je snel tot de kern!

Veelgestelde vragen

Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?

Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.

Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?

Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.

Van wie koop ik deze samenvatting?

Stuvia is een marktplaats, je koop dit document dus niet van ons, maar van verkoper louisa-marievandenheede. Stuvia faciliteert de betaling aan de verkoper.

Zit ik meteen vast aan een abonnement?

Nee, je koopt alleen deze samenvatting voor €4,99. Je zit daarna nergens aan vast.

Is Stuvia te vertrouwen?

4,6 sterren op Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

Afgelopen 30 dagen zijn er 83637 samenvattingen verkocht

Opgericht in 2010, al 14 jaar dé plek om samenvattingen te kopen

Start met verkopen
€4,99  8x  verkocht
  • (1)
  Kopen