100% tevredenheidsgarantie Direct beschikbaar na betaling Zowel online als in PDF Je zit nergens aan vast
logo-home
Summary Political rhetoric €6,49
In winkelwagen

Samenvatting

Summary Political rhetoric

 15 keer bekeken  0 keer verkocht

Samenvatting van alle lessen gebaseerd op de powerpoint, eigen notities en het boek.

Voorbeeld 4 van de 33  pagina's

  • Nee
  • Enkel de hoofdstukken die worden behandeld in de lessen
  • 14 februari 2023
  • 33
  • 2021/2022
  • Samenvatting
book image

Titel boek:

Auteur(s):

  • Uitgave:
  • ISBN:
  • Druk:
Alles voor dit studieboek (2)
Alle documenten voor dit vak (9)
avatar-seller
SiegeVG
Political Rhetoric
1 Lecture 1 – introduction
The importance of political rhetoric

 No politics without persuasion
 Reason: uncertainty
 Persuasion by speech vs. persuasion by force
 The fundamental political skill?

What is rhetoric?

 < Greek ‘retoriketekhne’
o Rhetor = speaker
o Tekhne = art
 Studying rhetoric = learning the practical skills of persuasion
 Studying rhetoric = studying the persuasiveness of speech
 Not limited to spoken word (oratory)
o Written word
o Visuals

Political rhetoric

 Many areas of rhetorical studies
o E.g. law, organization studies,…
o Persuasion in the political realm
o Not limited to politicians!
o “What makes a political speech persuasive (or not)?”

Diverse research field

 Different backgrounds, different questions
o Linguistics (e.g. rhetorical figures)
o Psychology (e.g. emotions vs. the cognitive)
o Political science (e.g. questions of power)
o Communcation science (e.g. mass media)
 Each with their own terminology & research methods
 Difficulty: they don’t always talk to each other
 This course: eclectic approach

1.1 History
Rhetoric, a contested notion

 Words often associated with rhetoric: “mere”; “empty”
o Rhetoric is contrasted with reality
 Association with danger
o Can people be persuaded of anything? (violence, misinformation)
 At the same time: no democracy without free speech?

Rhetoric was central to ancient democracy

,  Greece, 500 BC
 From aristocracy to democracy
o Demos = people
o Ekklesia
 Highly participatory system
o Status of being citizen comes with obligations
 Rhetorical skills were important
 Teachers: sophists
o ▪ Sophos = wisdom
 ▪ E.g. Gorgias, Protagoras
 Culture of oral transmission
 Different views of classical thinkers

Plato

 Belief in one moral “truth”
o Allegory of the cave
o Only a small elite can see it
 Rhetoric is empty and dangerous
o It can persuade most people of anything; a ‘rudderless boat’; “sophistries”
o Can do bad instead of good (death of his mentor Socrates)
 “The Republic”
o Society should be based on reason
o Strict division: philosopher-kings; guardians and traders
 Ideas were later criticized (e.g. Popper)
 More sympathetic reading: argument for alternative type of rhetoric (dialectic)
o Cf. technocracy today

Aristotle

 Student of Plato
 More positive reading of rhetoric
o Man is a ‘political animal’
o ‘Good life’ is life in accordance with community (vs. Plato: natural state)
 Rhetoric complements philosophical reasoning
o How should the best case be put, given the argument, evidence, audience?
o Best case is not always clear
 “The art of rhetoric”
 Disclaimer: exclusive notion of ‘citizen’
o Cf. importance of ‘enthymeme’
o Degree of permitted disagreement is limited

Cicero

 Great orator of the Roman world
 Treatises on rhetoric (e.g. “De Oratore”)
 Like Aristotle, refuted sophism
o Understanding of topic comes first; then follows good speech
o But he himself was pragmatic
 Persuasion is not about techniques but about the talent to adapt

,Rhetoric diminished when modern state emerged

 Centralized, powerful authorities
 Laws to be obeyed without discussion (monopoly of violence)
o Subordination of citizen assemblies to rules
 Two thinkers (Hobbes and Rousseau)
o Contrasting interpretations of sovereign state
o Similar perception of danger of rhetoric

Hobbes

 “Leviathan” (1651)
 Pessimist about nature of human beings: uncertainty & competition driven by
passion/appetite
o Capable of reasoning (not like animals)
o But different interpretations of the same event; no shared morality
 Rhetoric leads to even more confusion
o E.g. metaphors
o vs. ‘Perspicious words’
 Rational thing to do: one-time “social contract”
o Appoint supreme power to bring civil piece

Rousseau

 “Social contract” (1762)
 Humans are ‘naturally good’ but modern society made them selfish
 Return to harmony through agreement among citizens
o State is not a distant Leviathan; no external authority
o Collective citizen body remains in charge
o Obey the “General Will” (internal motivation)
 General Will: not developed through rhetoric
o “Long debates bespeak the assendance of particular interests and the decline of the
state”
o Persuasion is essentially non-argumentative; appeals to individual’s conscience
 Need for unanimity: small & highly exclusive state
o People identify with each other; shared sentiment from within
 Cf. ‘dogmatic’ forms of speech today

Martin: politics vs political

 “Why do so many people (and classical thinkers / political theorists) see rhetoric as
dangerous?”
 Argument of James Martin (handbook): politics vs. the political
o Politics = regular activities taking place within the rules of the game
o The political = higher principles (what are the rules of the game?)
 The political is only partially settled…
o Realization that things might be done differently
o Power relations can always change
 … vs. philosophers who search for stable principles
 Potential for chaos, disorder, crisis

,  Dismissal of rhetoric is a symptom of that concern
 Because rhetoric involves both politics & the political
o “Just rhetoric”: Mundane day -to -day -business
o “Speeches that changed the world”: efforts to establish new principles
o Most often in between
 If thinker has sympathy for rhetoric (e.g. Aristotle), often limits (e.g. very exclusive public
sphere) to eliminate discussion about the political
 Impossible to reconcile stability with inclusive rhetoric ?

1.2 Situating rhetoric
Language

 Rhetoric uses language
 Not all rhetoric is language
 Not all language is rhetoric

Ideology

 = Organized belief system (e.g. liberalism, communism)
 But rhetoric is about assembly/construction of ideas (and delivery)
 Ideology is a resource for rhetoric
 Rhetoric can change (or create) ideologies

Discourse

 Is also about how people ‘make meaning’ of things
 Also deals with persuasion and power (cf. critical discourse analysis)
 Discourse is broad and ungoing; rhetoric concentrates on situated encounters

2 Lecture 2 – classical rhetoric
Ancient rhetorical classifications and techniques – read chapter 1 (bb)

1. Occasions of speech
2. The issue
3. Discovery of the argument (ethos – pathos – logos)
4. Arrangement of the argument

2.1 Occasions of speech
 Good rhetoric is context-dependent
 Three “occasions” of speech

Sorts of speeches

 Epideictic (ceremonial)
o Honour/commerate individuals
o Eg. wedding, funeral, rousing oration before battle
o GOAL: creating shared sentiment
o Typical arguments: praise or blame, focus on present
 Forensic (judicial)
o Guilt or innocence
o Eg. defence in court

Voordelen van het kopen van samenvattingen bij Stuvia op een rij:

√  	Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews

√ Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews

Stuvia-klanten hebben meer dan 700.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet je zeker dat je de beste documenten koopt!

Snel en makkelijk kopen

Snel en makkelijk kopen

Je betaalt supersnel en eenmalig met iDeal, Bancontact of creditcard voor de samenvatting. Zonder lidmaatschap.

Focus op de essentie

Focus op de essentie

Samenvattingen worden geschreven voor en door anderen. Daarom zijn de samenvattingen altijd betrouwbaar en actueel. Zo kom je snel tot de kern!

Veelgestelde vragen

Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?

Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.

Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?

Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.

Van wie koop ik deze samenvatting?

Stuvia is een marktplaats, je koop dit document dus niet van ons, maar van verkoper SiegeVG. Stuvia faciliteert de betaling aan de verkoper.

Zit ik meteen vast aan een abonnement?

Nee, je koopt alleen deze samenvatting voor €6,49. Je zit daarna nergens aan vast.

Is Stuvia te vertrouwen?

4,6 sterren op Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

Afgelopen 30 dagen zijn er 53340 samenvattingen verkocht

Opgericht in 2010, al 14 jaar dé plek om samenvattingen te kopen

Start met verkopen
€6,49
  • (0)
In winkelwagen
Toegevoegd