This document is tailored to AQA Philosophy A-Level. It is a complete set of notes on Aristotelian Virtue Ethics, including counterarguments and replies etc. There are notes on the reciprocity of the virtues thesis, significance of voluntary/non-voluntary/involuntary/mixed action types, the golden ...
- ‘The good’ for human beings: the meaning of Eudaimonia as the ‘final end’ and the relationship between
Eudaimonia and pleasure.
- The function argument and the relationship between virtues and function.
- Aristotle’s account of virtues and vices: virtues as character traits/dispositions; the role of
education/habituation in the development of a moral character; the skill analogy; the importance of feelings;
the doctrine of the mean and its application to particular virtues.
- Moral responsibility: voluntary, involuntary, and non-voluntary actions.
- The relationship between virtues, actions and reasons and the role of practical reasoning/ practical wisdom.
- Issues including:
o whether Aristotelian virtue ethics can give sufficiently clear guidance about how to act
o clashing/competing virtues
o the possibility of circularity involved in defining virtuous acts and virtuous persons in terms of each
other
o whether a trait must contribute to Eudaimonia in order to be a virtue
o the relationship between the good for the individual and moral good.
Key Definitions
Ergon – the human function.
Telos – our purpose, or ‘end’.
Eudaimonia – our ultimate goal, ultimate happiness, that we must strive towards.
Literally, it translates to flourishing and wellbeing.
Phronesis – our practical reason which we can develop through ethical training and
education, becoming virtuous and thus happy. It is developed best in situations
when virtues are at stake.
Phronimos – the moral agent with practical wisdom, who is a good judge of ethical
situations.
Through habituation, we develop our capability for PHRONESIS (rational activity),
which is our ERGON (function), to each our TELOS (end goal), which is
Overview + Reciprocity of the Virtues Thesis
- Virtue ethics looks to the agent performing the actions, instead of the
consequences or motive.
o He says a virtuous person needs to know what they’re doing, and choose
the action for the sake of virtue.
- Aristotle doesn’t give us rules on how to behave, emphasising the centrality of
practical reasoning skills instead. These help us make the right decisions.
o Practical reasoning skills are central to virtue ethics, developed through
habituation. Just as we practice football to become a good footballer, we
must practice virtue (in situations where it is at stake, particularly) to
become phronimos.
o These skills help us make the right decision (Aristotle would say identify
the mean) in the situation we find ourselves in.
- To achieve EUDAIMONIA (ultimate happiness), we need PHRONESIS (practical
reason). This means practicing practical reasoning.
, - We can’t have phronesis without virtue of character and can't have character
virtues without practical reason (phronesis).
- This is the RECIPROCITY OF THE VIRTUES THESIS – a person with virtue must
have practical wisdom; a person with practical wisdom must have virtue.
Problem – Indeterminacy
- It is very indeterminately action-guiding. It can’t really guide you to be a more
moral person. If you’re facing a big moral decision, there is no decision
procedure to help you.
The doctrine of the mean can’t tell you whether or not to have an abortion
(Louden).
Reply – Guidance
- If you follow the guidance of Virtue ethics in regards to developing Phronesis,
you will be able to make the decision.
- Its flexibility is a good thing, the lack of prescriptive doctrine means you can
make the choice that is truly best.
Virtue and Action Types
- A virtuous person needs to...
o Know what they’re doing
o Choose the action for the sake of virtue
- To what extent they chose their action and knew what they were doing impacts
the degree of their moral responsibility for the action.
Voluntary actions: Contribute to our virtue character development. We are fully
responsible for them if…
(a) we fully intended to do it / its origin is within us
(b) we know what we are doing
(c) we chose freely.
This is the ideal procedure:
1. Wish
2. Deliberation
3. Choice
4. Voluntary action
5. Habituation
6. Virtue
Non-Voluntary actions: These are done out of ignorance. Responsibility depends on if
we regret them or not; if, after, you wish that you had done differently, then you aren’t
responsible.
Involuntary actions: These are those contrary to our intentions. We are not responsible
for them if they are
Voordelen van het kopen van samenvattingen bij Stuvia op een rij:
√ Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews
Stuvia-klanten hebben meer dan 700.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet je zeker dat je de beste documenten koopt!
Snel en makkelijk kopen
Je betaalt supersnel en eenmalig met iDeal, Bancontact of creditcard voor de samenvatting. Zonder lidmaatschap.
Focus op de essentie
Samenvattingen worden geschreven voor en door anderen. Daarom zijn de samenvattingen altijd betrouwbaar en actueel. Zo kom je snel tot de kern!
Veelgestelde vragen
Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?
Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.
Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?
Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.
Van wie koop ik deze samenvatting?
Stuvia is een marktplaats, je koop dit document dus niet van ons, maar van verkoper amaliablank2006. Stuvia faciliteert de betaling aan de verkoper.
Zit ik meteen vast aan een abonnement?
Nee, je koopt alleen deze samenvatting voor €4,27. Je zit daarna nergens aan vast.
