100% tevredenheidsgarantie Direct beschikbaar na je betaling Lees online óf als PDF Geen vaste maandelijkse kosten
logo-home
Eerder door jou gezocht
Eerder door jou gezocht
logo
RRLLB81 Assignment 3 (COMPLETE ANSWERS) Semester 1 2024 - DUE 20 May 2024 €2,66
In winkelwagen
Snel navigeren naar
Voorbeeld
  2.  
  3. University Of South Africa
  4.  
  5. RRLLB81 - LLB Research Report (RRLLB81)

Tentamen (uitwerkingen)

RRLLB81 Assignment 3 (COMPLETE ANSWERS) Semester 1 2024 - DUE 20 May 2024

2 beoordelingen
 10 keer verkocht
  • Vak
  • RRLLB81 - LLB Research Report (RRLLB81)
  • Instelling
  • University Of South Africa
  • Boek
  • Legal Research and Writing for Paralegals

RRLLB81 Assignment 3 (COMPLETE ANSWERS) Semester 1 2024 - DUE 20 May 2024 ;100 % TRUSTED workings, explanations and solutions. For assistance call or W.h.a.t.s.a.p.p us on ...(.+.2.5.4.7.7.9.5.4.0.1.3.2)........... (TOPIC 1: COMPANY LAW; TOPIC 3: CRIMINAL PROCEDURE; TOPIC 4: INSURANCE LAW) (TOPI...

[Meer zien]

Voorbeeld 4 van de 93  pagina's

Document informatie

  • 9 mei 2024
  • 93
  • 2023/2024
  • Tentamen (uitwerkingen)
  • Vragen en antwoorden

Onderwerpen

  • rrllb81 assignment 3 semester 1 due 20 may 2024

Gekoppeld boek

book image

Titel boek:

Auteur(s):

  • Uitgave:
  • ISBN:
  • Druk:

Geschreven voor

  • University of South Africa
  • RRLLB81 - LLB Research Report (RRLLB81)
Alle documenten voor dit vak (37)

2  beoordelingen

review-writer-avatar

Door: LydiaKhosa • 8 maanden geleden

Incorrect assignment

reply-writer-avatar

Door: LIBRARYpro • 8 maanden geleden

What do you mean? The assignment is 100% correct! Why hate?

review-writer-avatar

Door: piusmphathiwa • 8 maanden geleden

There is no assignment wages in labour law

Verkoper

avatar-seller
LIBRARYpro

Ontvangen beoordelingen

Voorbeeld van de inhoud

RRLLB81
ASSIGNMENT 3 SEMESTER 1 2024

4 - FINAL RESEARCH REPORTS
DUE DATE: 20 May 2024

, RRLLB81/103/1/2024




Research Report
RRLLB81

Assignment 3 Semester 1 2024


Department of Criminal and Procedural Law


IMPORTANT INFORMATION:

This tutorial letter contains important information
about your module.

, RRLLB81/103/1/2024



SECTION B
TOPICS FOR ASSESSMENT 2 AND ASSESSMENT 3

Below you will find the research topics from which you have to select one for your research
report. The topics are arranged by Department in the School of Law. Most topics are
supplemented with background information and references to preliminary sources based
on the topics. The preliminary sources are the minimum sources necessary – you must
supplement the sources indicated through independent research on the topic
selected.
NOTE: You are required to select one (1) topic from those listed and to base your both
Assessment 2 and Assessment 3 for RRLLB81 on that same topic. You may not change
topics once you have selected one. We are able to identify your specific assignment
submissions and to verify that you keep to the same topic.
The due dates and unique numbers for Assessment 2 and Assessment 3 will appear
on the myUnisa module site for RRLLB81.

MERCANTILE LAW

TOPIC 1: COMPANY LAW

THE TURQUAND RULE AND THE LIABILITY OF COMPANIES IN SOUTH AFRICAN
LAW

Background

Companies are managed by directors who have the liberty to enter into a contract with
third parties. Obviously, companies may have internal rules that provide certain individuals
with the authority to contract on behalf of the company. A company representative may
enter into a contract without complying with an internal formality to which his authority is
subject. Of course, lack of formality may entail that the company should not be held liable
for a contract that the company has not assented to. This would lead to a third party
rendering a performance that may not lead to a counter performance by the company. The
lack of consensus between the third party and the company renders the contract null and
void. However, a third party may argue that he/she relied on the company’s representation
to assume that there will be counter performance or that the representative had the
required authority.

Conduct research on this problem and provide your own opinion on whether it is fair to
hold a company to a contract it did not assent to. Equally, is it fair for a company to benefit
from a performance of a third party without rendering counter performance?

Suggested reading material

Cases
One Stop Financial Services (Pty) Ltd v Neffensaan Ontwikkelings (Pty) Ltd 2015 (4) SA
623 (WCC)
The Mine Workers’ Union v JJ Prinsloo; The Mine Workers’ Union v JP Prinsloo; The Mine
Workers’ Union v Greyling 1948 (3) SA 831 (A)

39

, Legislation
Companies Act 71 of 2008

Books
Beuthin RC and Luiz SM, Basic Company Law (3rd edn, LexisNexis 2012)
Cassim FHI (ed), Contemporary Company Law (3rd edn, Juta 2021)

Journal Articles
Delport P, ‘Companies Act 71 of 2008 and the “Turquand” Rule’ (2011) 74 THRHR 132
Olivier EA, ‘The Turquand Rule in South African Company Law: A(nother) Suggested
Solution’ (2019) 5 J of Corporate and Commercial L & Practice 1


TOPIC 2: LABOUR LAW

WAGE ISSUES IN LABOUR LAW

Background
Employers and employees generally need each other to prosper. Employees are given
rights to resist any kind of exploitation by the employers, such as the right to strike.
Equally, the employer can use any machinery provided by the law to limit the employees’
abuse of their rights, such as a lock out. A right can be used to advance an interest, for
example employees can use the right to strike to compel the employer to take heed of their
wage demands. There is generally a balancing scale to ensure that employers and
employees deal with each other in a fair manner. However, most of the time employees’
issues are advanced by trade unions. The role of trade unions in employment issues has
become more prominent, particularly in wage negotiations. The role and manner in which
trade unions should advance employees’ needs in wage negotiation is at best unclear. It is
not quite clear whether trade unions should religiously promote the mandate received from
employees even when unreasonable, or whether the trade union should exercise a
measure of liberty in negotiations since they have the mandate to do so. How about
instances where a trade union ventures into the political arena instead of staying true to its
mandate? This means that a trade union can advance its own political interest instead of
promoting workers’ needs first. Which means that platforms such as arbitration could
remedy this problem. One wonders whether the current law limits such abuses. You can
research why it is important to resolve matters of mutual interest in a forum that promotes
the interest of both the employer and employee. A right to strike is an important tool
assisting employees to compel the employer to negotiate in good faith. The need for trade
unions to be regulated in terms of negotiating wages for employees is also important. This
is simply to ensure that everyone negotiates in good faith.

Suggested reading material

Cases
Public Servants Association v National Prosecuting Authority [2012] 8 BLLR 765 (LAC);
(2012) 33 ILJ 1831 (LAC)
Working On Fire (Pty) Ltd v National Union of Metalworkers of South Africa (NUMSA)
(2022) 43 ILJ 2764 (LAC); [2023] 1 BLLR 39 (LAC)



40

Dit zijn jouw voordelen als je samenvattingen koopt bij Stuvia:

Bewezen kwaliteit door reviews

Bewezen kwaliteit door reviews

Studenten hebben al meer dan 850.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet jij zeker dat je de beste keuze maakt!

In een paar klikken geregeld

In een paar klikken geregeld

Geen gedoe — betaal gewoon eenmalig met iDeal, Bancontact of creditcard en je bent klaar. Geen abonnement nodig.

Focus op de essentie

Focus op de essentie

Studenten maken samenvattingen voor studenten. Dat betekent: actuele inhoud waar jij écht wat aan hebt. Geen overbodige details!

Veelgestelde vragen

Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?

Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.

Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?

Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.

Van wie koop ik deze samenvatting?

Stuvia is een marktplaats, je koop dit document dus niet van ons, maar van verkoper LIBRARYpro. Stuvia faciliteert de betaling aan de verkoper.

Zit ik meteen vast aan een abonnement?

Nee, je koopt alleen deze samenvatting voor €2,66. Je zit daarna nergens aan vast.

Is Stuvia te vertrouwen?

4,6 sterren op Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

Afgelopen 30 dagen zijn er 69052 samenvattingen verkocht

Opgericht in 2010, al 15 jaar dé plek om samenvattingen te kopen

Start met verkopen
€2,66  10x  verkocht
  • (2)
In winkelwagen
Toegevoegd