100% tevredenheidsgarantie Direct beschikbaar na betaling Zowel online als in PDF Je zit nergens aan vast
logo-home
Phil 334 Final Exam || Already Passed. €10,17   In winkelwagen

Tentamen (uitwerkingen)

Phil 334 Final Exam || Already Passed.

 8 keer bekeken  0 keer verkocht
  • Vak
  • Phil 334
  • Instelling
  • Phil 334

Contractarianism correct answers Principles of justice are principles we would select as the object of a collective choice. Harm Principle correct answers Mills: The only legitimate reason capable of justifying liberty limiting legislation is that this legislation is intended to, and would be ef...

[Meer zien]

Voorbeeld 2 van de 5  pagina's

  • 4 augustus 2024
  • 5
  • 2024/2025
  • Tentamen (uitwerkingen)
  • Vragen en antwoorden
  • Phil 334
  • Phil 334
avatar-seller
Phil 334 Final Exam || Already Passed.
Contractarianism correct answers Principles of justice are principles we would select as the
object of a collective choice.

Harm Principle correct answers Mills: The only legitimate reason capable of justifying liberty
limiting legislation is that this legislation is intended to, and would be effective at preventing
harm to persons other than the individual whose liberty is so limited. (Harm to others)

Difference Principle correct answers States that economic and social equalities (or inequalities)
should be arranged to provide the most benefit to the least-advantaged members of society

Maximin Reasoning correct answers Make sure the worst possible outcome of your choice is as
good as you can make it

primary goods correct answers the things every rational person must be presumed to want,
necessary for the pursuit of any conception of the good. They are necessary to insure that all
have equality of opportunity.

Original Position correct answers a morally credentialled choosing position, from which we
decide on principles for the basic structure of society. Circumstances of the OP insure that the
agreement reached will be fair.

Principle of Moralism correct answers It is legitimate to justify liberty limiting legislation on the
ground that it prevents people from doing what is morally wrong, even when the behavior in
question is harmless.

Principle of Paternalism correct answers It is legitimate to justify liberty limiting legislation on
the ground that it would prevent people from engaging in behavior that, while harmless to others,
poses harm or risk of harm to themselves.

Utilitarianism correct answers idea that the goal of society should be to bring about the greatest
happiness for the greatest number of people

Leopold's Key Log Principle correct answers "A thing is right when it tends to preserve the
integrity, stability, and beauty of the biotic community. It is wrong when it tends otherwise."

legal standing correct answers An individual has legal standing just in case it has interests, and
can be represented as a primary litigant or plaintiff in court.

Moral Standing correct answers A thing has moral standing if and only if it is an appropriate
primary object of moral concern and respect.

Brundtland Sustainability correct answers Institutions, policies, and management practices are
sustainable if and only if they "meet the needs of the present generation without compromising
the ability of future generations to meet their needs" (Adapted from WCED 1987, p. 43).

, Solow Sustainability correct answers Institutions, policies, or management practices are
sustainable if and only if their operation leaves later generations capital resources that are value-
equivalent to the capital resources available to earlier generations.

Explain and critically evaluate one of Beckerman's arguments against the idea that we can have
obligations of justice toward future generations. correct answers Since people from distant
generations cannot cooperate, they are not in the circumstances of justice with respect to one
another.
Therefore there can be no such thing as justice between generations.
Future generations inevitably do not exist
Makes sense to plan for the future that exists!

Is Leopold's land ethic adequate to provide a response to the climate crisis? Explain the central
elements of Leopold's view, and apply it to the problem of climate change. Then evaluate
whether it is adequate. correct answers Guide us toward making better choices than worse
"A thing is right when it tends to preserve the integrity, stability, and beauty of the biotic
community. It is wrong when it tends otherwise."
"All ethics so far evolved rest upon a single premise: that the individual is a member of a
community of interdependent parts. (...) The land ethic simply enlarges the boundaries of the
community to include soils, waters, plants, and animals, or collectively: the land." (SCA 203-4)

Draw a Prisoners' Dilemma or Commons Tragedy Matrix, and explain why some people believe
that climate policy is essentially a prisoners' dilemma or commons tragedy. Then explain and
critically evaluate (briefly) Gardiner's argument against this idea. correct answers Two kinds of
problems with commons tragedy
- Free-rider problem
- Coordination Problem
Good thing with prisoners dilemma and commons tragedy
- There is an outcome for everyone
Argument about climate change isn't a prisoners dilemma
People are making choices for themselves
People are making choices for nations
Climate change is a public goods problem
Prisoners' dilemma is individuals on both sides
Gardiner: Since, in the context of climate change, there are people who would be disadvantaged
by an agreement, the problem of climate agreement is not a Commons Tragedy.
Gardiner: Further, since different agreements favor different parties differently, settling on terms
for an international climate agreement is not like settling on a cooperative outcome in a PD or
commons tragedy.

According to Gardiner, climate policy is made more difficult by "fragmented agency" and
"institutional inadequacy." Explain and critically evaluate Gardiner's view on these two issues.
correct answers Fragmentation of Agency: Nations are collectives with different interests, not
persons with coherent interests, and agency is distributed widely within the population. It is
because of this that PD is a dangerous misdiagnosis of the problem.

Voordelen van het kopen van samenvattingen bij Stuvia op een rij:

√  	Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews

√ Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews

Stuvia-klanten hebben meer dan 700.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet je zeker dat je de beste documenten koopt!

Snel en makkelijk kopen

Snel en makkelijk kopen

Je betaalt supersnel en eenmalig met iDeal, Bancontact of creditcard voor de samenvatting. Zonder lidmaatschap.

Focus op de essentie

Focus op de essentie

Samenvattingen worden geschreven voor en door anderen. Daarom zijn de samenvattingen altijd betrouwbaar en actueel. Zo kom je snel tot de kern!

Veelgestelde vragen

Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?

Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.

Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?

Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.

Van wie koop ik deze samenvatting?

Stuvia is een marktplaats, je koop dit document dus niet van ons, maar van verkoper FullyFocus. Stuvia faciliteert de betaling aan de verkoper.

Zit ik meteen vast aan een abonnement?

Nee, je koopt alleen deze samenvatting voor €10,17. Je zit daarna nergens aan vast.

Is Stuvia te vertrouwen?

4,6 sterren op Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

Afgelopen 30 dagen zijn er 84190 samenvattingen verkocht

Opgericht in 2010, al 14 jaar dé plek om samenvattingen te kopen

Start met verkopen
€10,17
  • (0)
  Kopen