MGMT 311 Hailey (non-honors) - Exam 3 Questions and Answers
8 keer bekeken 0 aankoop
Vak
MGMT 311 Hailey
Instelling
MGMT 311 Hailey
MGMT 311 Hailey (non-honors) - Exam 3 Questions and Answers
Privileges and Immunities Clause - Answer-prevents a state from treating citizens of other states in a discriminatory manner (as long as they are engaging in basic and essential activities like earning a living or access to housing) un...
MGMT 311 Hailey (non-honors) - Exam 3
Questions and Answers
Privileges and Immunities Clause - Answer-prevents a state from treating citizens of
other states in a discriminatory manner (as long as they are engaging in basic and
essential activities like earning a living or access to housing) unless the foreign state
has a substantial reason for treating nonresidents differently from its own residents
Full Faith and Credit Clause - Answer-rights established under deeds, wills, and
contracts will be honored in other states, applies only to civil matters, all public records
are public in every state
Separation of powers - Answer-Legislative, Executive, Judicial
Commerce Clause - Answer--1 of strongest powers federal government has
-federal power that regulates commerce with foreign nations and between states
-expansion of federal power
Gibbons v. Ogden (1824) - Answer-federal government can regulate intrastate if the
commerce concerns more than one state
Wickard v. Filburn (1942) - Answer-farmer's crop production to be used wholly for
consumption on his farm was subject to federal regulation because it affected interstate
commerce (Supply/demand in state)
Heart of Atlanta Motel v. US (1964) - Answer-first challenge to constitutionality of Civil
Rights Act which was rooted in commerce clause, mom and pop motel that would not
allow African-Americans and argued it should not apply to them because they were
small, but they were located on highway in Atlanta and affected commerce
US v. Morrison (2000) - Answer-Congress exceeded its authority in passing federal
Violence Against Women Act, because it attempted to regulate an area that had nothing
to do with commerce or any sort of enterprise (so did not apply to commerce clause)
Gonzales v. Raich (2005) - Answer-2 terminally ill women prescribed marijuana, grew
the plant, arrested by the feds, feds can enforce federal law if they are noncommercial
activities taking place wholly within state's borders
Dormant Commerce Clause - Answer-states do not have the authority to regulate
interstate commerce
,Courts must balance states interests in purposes of the regulation against the burden
places on interstate commercE - Answer-When state regulations can affect interstate
commerce:
Raymond Motor Transportation Inc. v. Rice - Answer-The burden on trucks changing
lengths for different states is greater than the burden on the state
Supremacy Clause - Answer-Constitution is the supreme law of the land
Preemption - Answer--when Congress chooses to act exclusively in area that could be
viewed as concurrent area
-present when there is conflict between state and federal law
Taxing Power - Answer-Congress has the power to tax, but must be uniform throughout
the U.S., courts allow tax if it is valid revenue-raising measure
Spending Power - Answer-- Congress pays debts and provides for defense and general
welfare of US
- Rarely challenged - problem with standing- plaintiff must show a direct and immediate
personal injury to challenge federal spending power
- Congress can spend revenues to promote any objective it deems worthwhile
Bill of Rights - Answer--First 10 amendments
-Originally only applied to feds
-14th amendment incorporated to states
-Supreme Court is final interpreter of Constitution
1st Amendment - Freedom of Speech - Answer-say or write just about anything you
want
Symbolic Speech - Answer-gestures, movements, articles of clothing
Texas v. Johnson (1989) - Answer--Struck down Texas law that banned flag burning,
which is a protected form of symbolic speech according to Supreme Court
-did not pass strict scrutiny of substantive due process
Reasonable Restrictions - Answer--Expression (oral, written, or symbolized by conduct)
is subject to reasonable restrictions
-balancing of rights of citizens vs. government's duty to protect its citizens (case-by-
case basis)
-laws that restrict content of speech must serve a compelling state interest and be
narrowly written to achieve that interest
Content Neutral Restrictions - Answer-control over symbolic speech, time-place-and-
manner laws that control place and manner of speech
, Bong Hits 4 Jesus (2007) - Answer--H.S. students across street from school and hold
this banner
-gets expelled and takes it to Supreme Court as a minor
-but school can protect speech to protect children
Corporate Political Speech - Answer-First Amendment protects a corporation's right to
speak out on political issues
Commercial Speech - Answer-Communication in the form of advertising. It can be
restricted more than many other types of speech but has been receiving increased
protection from the Supreme Court.
-the speech itself is lawful and not misleading
-law seeks to implement a substantial government interest "reasonable fit" between
government interest in limiting speech and restriction chosen to accomplish the
objective
-law directly advances that interest
-and law goes no further than necessary to accomplish the objective - Answer-when
restriction on commercial speech is ok:
Bad Frog Brewery, Inc. v. New York State Liquor Authority - Answer-label has bullfrog
with middle finger, outlawed by liquor authority, bad frog sued because it is not
misleading and is not narrowingly drawn
Unprotected Speech - Answer-defamation, lewd and obscene speech, threatening
speech
Defamation - Answer-lies that harm someone's reputation
Lewd and Obscene Speech - Answer-1) Supreme Court has difficulty defining this
2) Left to local standards
3) Child pornography is completely banned
4) Online obscenity has been hard to regulate due to free speech concerns
Threatening Speech - Answer-anything that threatens or incites violence
Freedom of Religion: Establishment Clause - Answer--prohibits government from
establishing religion or use religion
-federal/state regulations can have an impact on religion as long as it does not place a
significant burden on religion (still can have religious aspects)
-1st amendment does not require a complete separation of church and state (no hostility
allowed)
Law consists of - Answer-enforceable rules governing relationships among individuals
and between individuals and their society
Voordelen van het kopen van samenvattingen bij Stuvia op een rij:
√ Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews
Stuvia-klanten hebben meer dan 700.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet je zeker dat je de beste documenten koopt!
Snel en makkelijk kopen
Je betaalt supersnel en eenmalig met iDeal, Bancontact of creditcard voor de samenvatting. Zonder lidmaatschap.
Focus op de essentie
Samenvattingen worden geschreven voor en door anderen. Daarom zijn de samenvattingen altijd betrouwbaar en actueel. Zo kom je snel tot de kern!
Veelgestelde vragen
Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?
Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.
Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?
Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.
Van wie koop ik deze samenvatting?
Stuvia is een marktplaats, je koop dit document dus niet van ons, maar van verkoper Perfectscorer. Stuvia faciliteert de betaling aan de verkoper.
Zit ik meteen vast aan een abonnement?
Nee, je koopt alleen deze samenvatting voor €11,52. Je zit daarna nergens aan vast.
