FOR2609 Assignment 2 Due 16 September 2024 ((Detailed Answers)
25 keer bekeken 0 keer verkocht
Vak
Principles of Evidence in Forensic Investigation
Instelling
University Of South Africa
Boek
Forensic Investigation Handbook
The Question
Question 1 In your own words provide your understanding of the term “previous
consistent statement”. (10) Question 2 Opinion evidence can be crucial in solving the
case in court. Discuss opinion evidence and the exceptions to the general rule of
admissibility. (5) Question 3...
, Question 1: Understanding the Term “Previous Consistent Statement”
A "previous consistent statement" refers to a statement made by a witness before
they testify in court, which aligns with their testimony during the trial. This type of
statement is typically used to bolster the credibility of the witness, especially when
their testimony is challenged as being a recent fabrication or when their credibility is
under attack. The primary purpose of introducing a previous consistent statement is
to demonstrate that the witness's account has been consistent over time, thereby
reinforcing their reliability.
However, it's important to note that the general rule in court is that such statements
are not admissible as evidence of the truth of the content unless certain exceptions
apply. For example, if a witness's credibility is questioned due to alleged recent
fabrication, a previous consistent statement can be admitted to counter this claim,
showing that the witness has maintained a consistent story over time.
Question 2: Opinion Evidence and Its Exceptions
Opinion evidence refers to a witness's beliefs or inferences drawn from facts rather
than direct observations of the facts themselves. Generally, opinion evidence is not
admissible in court because the court relies on objective facts to reach a decision.
The primary concern is that opinions can be subjective and may not accurately
reflect the reality of the situation.
However, there are several exceptions to this general rule:
1. Expert Opinion: Experts in fields such as medicine, forensics, or engineering
can provide opinion evidence based on their specialized knowledge, training,
and experience. For instance, a forensic expert might offer an opinion on the
cause of death in a murder trial.
2. Lay Opinion: Laypersons may offer opinions if they are based on their
perception of events and are necessary to convey their testimony effectively.
For example, a witness might describe someone as "angry" based on their
observation of that person's behavior.
Voordelen van het kopen van samenvattingen bij Stuvia op een rij:
√ Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews
Stuvia-klanten hebben meer dan 700.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet je zeker dat je de beste documenten koopt!
Snel en makkelijk kopen
Je betaalt supersnel en eenmalig met iDeal, Bancontact of creditcard voor de samenvatting. Zonder lidmaatschap.
Focus op de essentie
Samenvattingen worden geschreven voor en door anderen. Daarom zijn de samenvattingen altijd betrouwbaar en actueel. Zo kom je snel tot de kern!
Veelgestelde vragen
Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?
Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.
Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?
Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.
Van wie koop ik deze samenvatting?
Stuvia is een marktplaats, je koop dit document dus niet van ons, maar van verkoper GeniusGears. Stuvia faciliteert de betaling aan de verkoper.
Zit ik meteen vast aan een abonnement?
Nee, je koopt alleen deze samenvatting voor €2,74. Je zit daarna nergens aan vast.
