Samenvatting
Summary Corporate Finance and Governance
Summary of Corporate Finance and Governance slides with extra notes taught by professor Deloof. I got a 16/20 for my exam with only using this summary
[Meer zien]Voorbeeld 4 van de 94 pagina's
Voorbeeld 4 van de 94 pagina's
In winkelwagen
Voorbeeld van de inhoud
Korte SV Corporate finance and governance1. Debt policies
Financing a Firm with Debt and Equity
• Modigliani and Miller argued that with “perfect” capital markets, the total value of a firm
should not depend on how it is financed
o Assumption M&M:
- No taxes, transaction costs, or issuance costs associated with security trading and
- A firm’s financing decisions has no impact on the cash flows generated by its
investments + it does not provide information on the value of these investments
• Debt is cheaper than equity for a firm, BUT it raises the cost of capital for equity
• Levered equity has higher risk (even when there is no risk that the firm will default)
o To compensate for this risk, more levered equity holders receive a higher expected return
• Leverage will not affect the total value of the firm*, it merely changes the allocation of cash flows
between debt and equity
o debt increase leads to cost of capital/equity increases: higher equity risk & higher required
return ➜ together: debt increase will not affect the cost of capital*
1) Modigliani-Miller Proposition I
• In a perfect capital market, the total value of a firm (or the value per share) is equal to the market
value of the total CF’s generated by its assets, and is not affected by its choice of capital structure
• Application: A Leveraged Recapitalization
• In a Modigliani & Miller world, this will not affect the value of the firm!
• First, Harrison sells debt to raise $80 million in cash / issuing debt (bonds) & then they use
the cash to repurchase shares
•
80 mil / 4 = 20 mil
shares repurchased
➜ 50 - 20 = 30
OR
120/4 = 30
➜ change in capital structure (increase in leverage), doesn’t affect the value for shareholders
2) Modigliani-Miller Proposition II
• Total cost of capital is not influenced by the capital structure & therefore always equals the
unlevered cost of capital (= 100% equity)
• MM Proposition I states that: E + D = U = A
– E: Market value of equity in a levered firm.
– D: Market value of debt in a levered firm.
– U: Market value of equity in an unlevered firm (100% equity)
– A: Market value of the firm’s assets
➜ Total cost of capital = weighted average of cost of debt & equity
1
,• take on more Debt? ➜ cost of E increase (more risk)
o how much? RE = RU + D/E(RU – RD)
o more cheap D (low RD gets more weight)
➜ Total cost of capital remains the same (= weighted average of cost of E & cost of D)
• Leverage and the Equity Cost of Capital
– The return on unlevered equity (RU) is related to the returns of levered equity (RE) and debt (RD):
o
o
➜ The levered equity return equals the unlevered
return, plus a premium due to leverage.
o more debt? ➜ premium bigger (D/E * …) ; higher return on equity (RE)
– MM Proposition II: The cost of capital of levered equity is equal to the cost of capital of
unlevered equity plus a premium that is proportional to the market value debt-equity ratio
o Cost of Capital of Levered Equity:
The Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC)
• If a firm is levered, rA is equal to the firm’s weighted average cost of capital
•
➜
Levered and Unlevered Betas
• The effect of leverage on the risk of a firm’s securities can also be expressed in terms of beta:
o Unlevered Beta: a measure of the risk of a firm as if it did not have leverage, which is
equivalent to the beta of the firm’s assets (weighted average of the β if equity & debt)
• CAPM= only systemic risk (=β) matters (other risks can be diversified away)
•
o Leverage amplifies the market risk of a firm’s assets, βU , raising the market risk of its equity
➜ risk for shareholders depends on:
1) firm activities (βU)
2) firm debt policy: debt rises; risk shareholders (βE) rises (D/E)
2
,Cash and Net Debt
• Holding cash has the opposite effect of leverage on risk and return and can be viewed as equivalent
to negative debt.
o Net Debt = Debt - Cash & Risk-Free Securities
-Debt: pay a fixed interest & Cash: earn a fixed interest
•
o negative net debt of -$16 bln
o
- βU > βE ➜ very unusual
o risk of operations higher than risk of equity because of negative net debt
o (βE = 2,57 + (-16/110)*(2,57-0) = 2,20)
Equity Issuances and Dilution
• Dilution: an increase in the total of shares that will divide a fixed amount of earnings
➜ this will lower the value per share
➜ in the context of the theory of M&M, that reasoning is wrong: total value will increase as well
• Example: o Tesla issued new shares, raised new equity
o Jet Sky Airlines (JSA) currently has no debt & 500 million shares of stock outstanding
o
= Value of the firm
• Results: The market value of JSA’s assets grows because of the additional $1 billion
in cash the firm has raised & number of shares increases ➜ VPS stays equal
• As long as the firm sells the new shares of equity at a fair price (reflects the true value), there will
be no gain or loss to already existing shareholders associated with the equity issue itself!
• Why then does the stock price so often decrease when an equity issuance is announced?
o stock at a high price? Perfect time for equity issuance: raise lots of money
➜ shareholders can see an equity issuance as a sign that the stock is overvalued; sell;
price decreases
FROM THIS PART: WE ADD IMPERFECTIONS
3
, The Interest Tax Deduction
• In the real world, interest payments are deductible from taxable corporate income!
• Example: Safeway, Inc.
o EBIT = $1.25 billion, Interest expenses = $400 million & Marginal corporate tax rate = 35
o
Difference = intrest tax shield
= 400*35% = 140
>
Not deductable? Taxes still 438;
net income 1250 – 400 – 438 = 412 ; +400 = 812
The Interest Tax Deduction
• Interest Tax Shield: the reduction in taxes paid due to the tax deductibility of interest
o In Safeway’s case, the gain is equal to the reduction in taxes with leverage: $438 million −
$298 million = $140 million. The interest payments provided a tax savings of 35% × $400
million = $140 million.
o The Cash Flows of the Unlevered and Levered Firm:
The Interest Tax Shield and Firm Value
• MM Proposition I with Taxes (total value if leverage )
o VL = VU + PV (Interest Tax Shield)
The Weighted Average Cost of Capital with Taxes
• Proposition II: WACC if leverage
• With tax-deductible interest, the effective after tax borrowing rate is r(1 − c ) and the weighted
average cost of capital becomes:
The WACC with and without Corporate Taxes:
Constant across capital
structures/leverage
WACC with
4
decreases, incentive
to go for 100% debt
Voordelen van het kopen van samenvattingen bij Stuvia op een rij:
√ Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews
Stuvia-klanten hebben meer dan 700.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet je zeker dat je de beste documenten koopt!
Snel en makkelijk kopen
Je betaalt supersnel en eenmalig met iDeal, Bancontact of creditcard voor de samenvatting. Zonder lidmaatschap.
Focus op de essentie
Samenvattingen worden geschreven voor en door anderen. Daarom zijn de samenvattingen altijd betrouwbaar en actueel. Zo kom je snel tot de kern!
Veelgestelde vragen
Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?
Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.
Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?
Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.
Van wie koop ik deze samenvatting?
Stuvia is een marktplaats, je koop dit document dus niet van ons, maar van verkoper UAstudent123. Stuvia faciliteert de betaling aan de verkoper.
Zit ik meteen vast aan een abonnement?
Nee, je koopt alleen deze samenvatting voor €7,48. Je zit daarna nergens aan vast.
Is Stuvia te vertrouwen?
4,6 sterren op Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
Afgelopen 30 dagen zijn er 78834 samenvattingen verkocht
Opgericht in 2010, al 14 jaar dé plek om samenvattingen te kopen