100% tevredenheidsgarantie Direct beschikbaar na je betaling Lees online óf als PDF Geen vaste maandelijkse kosten 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Case uitwerking

Assignment 2 (questions + answers) Statistics (GEO2-2217)

Beoordeling
-
Verkocht
2
Pagina's
11
Cijfer
7-8
Geüpload op
16-04-2021
Geschreven in
2020/2021

These are the questions and answers of assignment 2 of Statistics. It is due in the second part of the course.










Oeps! We kunnen je document nu niet laden. Probeer het nog eens of neem contact op met support.

Documentinformatie

Geüpload op
16 april 2021
Aantal pagina's
11
Geschreven in
2020/2021
Type
Case uitwerking
Docent(en)
Jarno hoekman
Cijfer
7-8

Voorbeeld van de inhoud

Assignment 2
N.B.: For all ANOVA tasks, you can ignore the homogeneity of variance assumption.
1. ANOVA
The questionnaire contains several questions about the societal and scientific output of
the projects. As discussed by a group of scientific scholars, such impact of a project can be
measured with:
I. The number of scientific publications (variable Publ).
II. Presence in the media (variable Media)
During the first assignment you have practiced with the technological topic of the
projects. We want to examine whether the six technological topics (variable TechTop)
differ significantly in terms of the different types of output (variables Publ and Media).
Perform appropriate ANOVAs to analyze this.
Use = 5% give the experimental hypotheses as well as the null hypotheses in your answer.
a. Do the technological topics groups differ significantly on:
i. Publ




Figure 1. One-way ANOVA-table for variables TechTop and Publ
ii. Media




Figure 2. One-way ANOVA-table for variables TechTop and Media


Null hypothesis - 𝐻0: δ = 0
Experimental hypothesis - 𝐻1: δ ≠ 0
As can be seen in Figure 1 and Figure 2, the two-tailed p-value of variable Publ is equal to
𝑝 = 0. 0021% and for the variable Media this is equal to 𝑝 = 1. 9%. Each two-tailed p-value, thus, is
beneath α = 5%, which indicates that the technological topics groups differ significantly. As a result,
the experimental hypothesis H1 can be accepted and the null hypothesis H0 can be rejected.

b. Express the strength of the differences of question 1a in a measurement. Show
your calculations and interpret the results. (tip: for each of the ANOVAs you need to
provide a calculation and interpretation).
2 𝑆𝑆𝑏𝑒𝑡𝑤𝑒𝑒𝑛
If we want to determine the strength of the differences, 𝑒𝑡𝑎 = 𝑆𝑆𝑡𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙
has to be calculated for each
2 1102.951
variable. For the first variable, variable Publ, this is equal to 𝑒𝑡𝑎 = 14055.888 = 0. 078. In Appendix 4,

, this effect size is known as a medium effect. So the strength of the differences is in this case
moderate.
2 18669.063
For the variable Media, this is equal to 𝑒𝑡𝑎 = 115288.588
= 0. 162. This is known as a large effect,
Appendix 4. Therefore, the strength of the differences is large.

c. Based on question 1a we now know which ANOVA(s) is/are statistically significant.
We continue in this question with an ANOVA that was statistically significant in
question 1a. So, your first task is to select an ANOVA that is statistically significant.
Suppose we had no idea in advance which of the technological topics differ on the
different types of impact. Therefore, we will perform a post-hoc analysis according
to Tukey (α = 5%) for this selected ANOVA. Which technological topics differ
significantly? Describe both output tables of the post-hoc Tukey analysis in your
answer.
As indicated in question 1a, both the variable Publ and the variable Media differ significantly. In
comparison with the variable Publ, the variable Media has the lowest two-tailed p-value, which is why
we chose for the variable Media to be involved in the post-hoc analysis, as can be seen in Figure 3
and Figure 4.




Figure 4. Post-Hoc analysis Tukey
Subsets-table for variables TechTop and Media




Figure 3. Post-Hoc analysis Tukey for variables TechTop and Media


In Figure 4, the post-hoc analysis Tukey shows three subsets related to the different technological
project topics:
● In subset 1, the technological project topics ‘Plastic reduction’, ‘Agro technology’ and ‘Solar
energy’ are involved;
● Subset 2 consists of the technological project topics ‘Agro technology’, ‘Solar energy’,
‘Circular fashion’ and Wind energy’;

Maak kennis met de verkoper

Seller avatar
De reputatie van een verkoper is gebaseerd op het aantal documenten dat iemand tegen betaling verkocht heeft en de beoordelingen die voor die items ontvangen zijn. Er zijn drie niveau’s te onderscheiden: brons, zilver en goud. Hoe beter de reputatie, hoe meer de kwaliteit van zijn of haar werk te vertrouwen is.
yaralangeveld Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Bekijk profiel
Volgen Je moet ingelogd zijn om studenten of vakken te kunnen volgen
Verkocht
364
Lid sinds
8 jaar
Aantal volgers
180
Documenten
119
Laatst verkocht
1 dag geleden
Samenvattingen NW&I (Universiteit Utrecht) en MPA (VU Amsterdam)

Ik ben een enthousiaste student die graag zelf goede samenvattingen maakt voor tentamens over diverse vakken van innovatie en natuurwetenschappen. Deze wil ik graag met jou delen, zodat jij je ook optimaal kunt voorbereiden op tentamens! Groetjes!

3,9

36 beoordelingen

5
12
4
14
3
6
2
2
1
2

Recent door jou bekeken

Waarom studenten kiezen voor Stuvia

Gemaakt door medestudenten, geverifieerd door reviews

Kwaliteit die je kunt vertrouwen: geschreven door studenten die slaagden en beoordeeld door anderen die dit document gebruikten.

Niet tevreden? Kies een ander document

Geen zorgen! Je kunt voor hetzelfde geld direct een ander document kiezen dat beter past bij wat je zoekt.

Betaal zoals je wilt, start meteen met leren

Geen abonnement, geen verplichtingen. Betaal zoals je gewend bent via iDeal of creditcard en download je PDF-document meteen.

Student with book image

“Gekocht, gedownload en geslaagd. Zo makkelijk kan het dus zijn.”

Alisha Student

Veelgestelde vragen