PHIL 347 (PHIL 347)

PHIL 347 WEEK 2 CHECKPOINT QUIZ. 100% CORRECT QUESTION AND ANSWER PHIL 347 Week 2 Checkpoint Quiz Score for this quiz: 50 out of 50 Submitted May 17 at 12:42pm This attempt took 131 minutes. Question 1 10 / 10 pts Briefly state how the text defines “claim.” Your Answer: A claim is intended to support the "reason". A claim is the expression to make an argument in a process to give one or more "reasons" in support of the claim. The term claim refers to the s...

PHIL 347 WEEK 3 CHECK POINT QUIZ QUESTION AND ANSWERS WITH COMPLETE SOLUTION Question 1 5 / 5 pts According to the text, how do the views of stronger, more developed critical thinkers toward authority differ from those in earlier stages of cognitive development? Your Answer: Developed critical thinkers are skeptical. They will not trust the word of an authority figure without skepticism and their own research. Critical Thinkers are likely ranked "sages" and "truth-seekers" on the levels of ...

PHIL 347 WEEK 4 CHECK POINT QUIZ Questions and Answers 100% Verified Based on what you have read in the text, the lecture, and any other sources you find helpful to your understanding of deductive arguments, explain the structure of a deductive argument in your own words. Your Answer: A deductive argument typically has two premises and a conclusion based on those premises. In order for the conclusion to be true, the premises must be true as well. Therefore, if the premises are true, th...

PHIL 347 Knowledge check week 5 100% Correct Question and Answer (complete Solution) Which area of patient health is not directly addressed in Nightingale’s 13 canons for nursing practice? Question 1 options: A) Observing and recording patient behavior B) Ensuring patient comfort and continuity of care D) Providing appropriate food and stimulation for the patient Save Question 2 (1 point) Which selection most closely matches the definition of the health metaparadigm a...

PHIL 347 Week 6 Checkpoint Quiz Results New Solution With All Correct Questions and Answers Week 6 Checkpoint Quiz Results for Nursing Student Score for this quiz: 100 out of 100 Submitted Sep 13 at 6:20pm This attempt took 152 minutes Question 1 What are the three fundamental reasoning strategies listed in the text? Your Answer: The three fundamental reasoning strategies are 1) comparative reasoning 2) ideological reasoning 3) empirical reasoning Question 2 What ...

Phill 347 Week 6 Checkpoint Quiz Results for Nursing Student. Qusetions and Answers Latest Solution Question 1 What are the three fundamental reasoning strategies listed in the text? Your Answer: The three fundamental reasoning strategies are 1) comparative reasoning 2) ideological reasoning 3) empirical reasoning Question 2 What is comparative reasoning? On what skill is it based? Your Answer: Comparative Reasoning "enables us to make interpretations, draw inferences or offer ...

PHIL 347 Week 6 Discussion 2 complete solution

Based on what you have read in the text, the lecture, and any other sources you find helpful to your understanding of deductive arguments, explain the structure of a deductive argument in your own words. Question: Go to the box “Deductive Reasoning” (in the beginning of Chapter 8). Read the last paragraph there. Based on that reading and any other sources you find helpful to your understanding, describe the part that “rules, operating conditions, core beliefs, values, policies, principles,...

Based on what you have read in the text, the lecture, and any other sources you find helpful to your understanding of deductive arguments, explain the structure of a deductive argument in your own words. Question: Go to the box “Deductive Reasoning” (in the beginning of Chapter 8). Read the last paragraph there. Based on that reading and any other sources you find helpful to your understanding, describe the part that “rules, operating conditions, core beliefs, values, policies, principles,...

PHIL 347 Week 6 Checkpoint What are the three fundamental reasoning strategies listed in the text? What is comparative reasoning? On what skill is it based? We learned four tests for evaluating arguments: truthfulness of the premises, logical strength, relevance, and non-circularity. How well do these tests work with respect to evaluating comparative reasoning? Consider each of the four tests. What are the five criteria for evaluating comparative reasoning? Name and define them in your own words...