Class notes
lecture/textbook notes and assignments
- Course
- 311 (311)
- Institution
- University Of British Columbia (UBC )
includes notes from all lectures and readings, as well as drafts for certain assignments.
[Show more]
Seller
Follow
Content preview
311 POST MIDTERM II—FINAL PORTIONTESTING ROLE OF Procedures:
POSTERIOR PARIETAL - Subjects reached with right hand to stationary and displaced objects
CORTEX IN SACCADE - Targets would be displaced during saccadic eye movement
STUDY - TMS applied to posterior parietal cortex (creating virtual lesion)
Results from TMS:
- No significant effect on stationary grasp, because already planned movement
- When no TMS= when target jumped R, able to smoothly correct to R and vice versa (smoothly
integrated correction)
- When TMS fired= when target jumped, had no smooth online correction or if correction occurred,
happened at end of movement
- Effect seen on target jump = went to initially planned target location
2nd part of study:
- TMS to left posterior parietal cortex but point with L hand
- Because L posterior parietal cortex controls the R hand
- No effect seen because effect only on part of brain responsible for controlling movement
Implication of this study:
- Can disrupt on line correction of movement by disrupting dorsal stream (posterior parietal cortex)
OTHER STUDIES ON P.P.C - Looked at patients with lesions in PPC
AND ON LINE - Reach and grasp dowel on turntable as fast as possible
MOVEMENT—DOWEL - On some trials, table would turn
STUDY
Results:
- For controls= even when dowel moved with table turning= were smoothly able to adapt during
movement, seen with smooth velocity profile, integrated correction
- No significant difference b/w controls and patients during stationary condition
- patients= when target jumped, velocity profile showed that initial movement of original target location
was completed first then executed second
**patients used ventral/conscious stream
- For correction= separated into secondary movement, not integrated during movement
- grip aperture would open, close then open again
**still some correction observed in controls
SPACE/POSITION
CONSTANCY - Visual world remains stable when we move our eyes
DOUBLE JUMP - Blanking = during saccade, target briefly disappears and comes back at a new position
TARGET—BLANKING - Takes advantage of saccadic suppression = have reduced sensitivity to visual events during eye
movement —prevents blur in vision during rapid eye movement (also helps maintain space/position
constancy)=visual world remains stable when eyes moved
Procedures:
- Blanking paradigm =target shown, disappears and comes back at a new position (jumped)
Results:
- When blanking used to make target jump and asked subjects whether target jumped= start to notice
target moved (restores ability to discriminate whether target remained stationary or not)
HOW DOES THE VISUAL
SYSTEM USE *if target is continuously visible = brain uses that target as reference to assume stable world (things stay where
INFORMATION WHEN A they are in space)
TARGET IS
CONTINUOUSLY VISIBLE *if target made to disappear= visual system interprets this event as something new happening
VS. WHEN IT - Temporary discontinuity is used as evidence of spatial displacement
DISAPPEARS? -
SCHNEIDER Procedures:
STUDY—WHAT INFO WE - Have fixation point
CAN PROVIDE AT END OF - 2 items come up (1 is actual target, other is distractor item)
MOVEMENT - During eye movement, either distractor or target changes position
- And one of the two or both will blank during eye movement
, - Subject gives verbal report of which they think jumped (target or distractor)
Results:
- If target moved and distractor blamed= performance dropped (influence of perception when blanking vs
continuously visible)
- Reporting whatever blanked/was discontinuous as having moved
- While the one that had continuous vision was used as evidence of constancy (interpreted as part of
stable environment)= illusion made
**perceptual constancy pushed to consciousness
BLANKING VS TARGET Procedures:
JUMP—POINT TO TARGET - 2 items in periphery
- Same procedures as previous study (both blank, one of or neither, either one or toher jumps)
- But told to point to target —act on target movement
- Looked at motor performance with respect to target
- Perceptual vs motor report of target movement
Results:
- Verbal report= replication of previous results (whichever one blanked was reported to have jumped)
- Perceptual/motor report= when distractor jumped forward/backward, no diff in pointing —where you
pointed in reference to target did not jump
- Where you pointed followed the target!
- Despite pointing correct motor performance —cant use for inform conscious awareness
Pointing is unaffected by blanking illusion!
- Because on line control is integrated from conscious visual experience
PART 2:
- Point as fast/accurately as possible, same procedures but told if they think target jumped, inhibit
movement (pull back)
Results:
- The one that blanked again, is the one that was reported to have jumped
- Movement was corrected if target jumped forward/backward
- For movement inhibition if perceived that target jumped= seen to have pulled back when distractor
blanked (wrong perception/action)= indicative that decision to move limb back was influenced by
illusion because it is a conscious decision
Summary:
- Despite doing correct movement, this was not able to inform correct perceptual response
- On line control of movement is independent from conscious visual experience (function of dorsal
stream)= indicative of separation b/w dorsal and ventral stream
METACONTRAST - Large arrow hides/masks little arrow from conscious processing
MASKING - If enough time provided, little/masked arrow will come to consciousness
Visual masking = way to hide visual info from consciousness
- Test conscious perception vs unconscious action with use of simple RT task
VISUAL MASKING
PROCEDURE Procedures:
- Respond to direction of arrow after prime shown!!!
- Neutral prime arrow case= prior to arrow presented, neutral shape was shown (no directional info)
- Neutral shape = no diff between L or R mask rxn time
- When presented with prime (little arrow prior to actual) pointing to a specific direction=show effects
Key point** not consciously aware of this little prime shown prior to the arrow
Results:
- Faster if left prime shown then responding to right mask arrow, and faster when right prime to right
mask arrow
- *Respond faster when masked arrow was in the same direction as the mask subject responded to
implication/summary:
- Motor system is already being influenced unconsciously as evident by faster RTs when prime arrow
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller svetlanazivadinovic882. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for CA$37.02. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
Can Stuvia be trusted?
4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
76799 documents were sold in the last 30 days
Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now