Class notes
Total War in Europe
- Course
- World War 2 (HIST420)
- Institution
- University Of The Fraser Valley (UFV)
The logistics of a total war in Europe on both sides of the warfront
[Show more]
Seller
FollowContent preview
Total War in EuropeThe War of Resources and the Effort to Destroy Them
● Total War
○ In total war it becomes about who you can kill
○ Attack anything and everything (Selection and Maintenance of the Aim)
○ Industrialization and mobilization of resources
○ Blur of war front and homefront (Blockades)
○ World War II is a more mobile war in that it is large geographically
○ Goal: Breaking the morale/ will of the community (nation-state)
● Raw materials were highly important
● Women work in the factories would seem like the likely thing but they were actually
working in agriculture
● What is Total War?
○ Why does this happen?
○ Is it a modern phenomenon?
○ How is a total war manifested in the fighting?
○ What is the cost?
● Total War: Usually Associated with WW1 and WWII
○ Horrible loss of life is not unique in war: the Mongols killed millions in their 200
years of dominance- sought to depopulate China; might have killed up to 60
million
○ The inhabitants of Easter Island exterminated themselves over resources in the
18th Century
○ But… historically frictions that limit war (social, political, technological etc.) were
dominant: subsistence economies, limited warrior classes using edged weapons
○ No one wants total war: too much risk… but war can expand
● Nations in Arms
○ Gunpowder weapons made battles costly to both sides, even the winners, but the
political and industrial developments of the 19th Century created a nasty
combination of both the readiness of the masses to participate in war
(conscription as a civic duty or legal compulsion) and the economic/industrial
means to supply them
○ People read “to fight for their countries”
○ Add the internal combustion engine and now the masses can move and bring
war to the enemy’s home front
○ Started in WW1; much worse in WWII
○ Who is a legitimate target? Everyone?
● Mobilization of Resources
○ Having the public will and means to make war “total” still demands that one do
it-limitations (frictions) are always present
, ○ Germany and Japan started WWII with large stocks of weapons; Germany loathe
to fight total war; ironically, Japan fought it to gain the resources it lacked to
sustain war
○ Democracies seemed to do well; Russia, however, was the best and most
efficient. Germany and Japan the worst although German production did
increase: 1942, Albert Speer
○ See Presentation: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N6xLMUifbxQ (Tank
production segment starts 26 minutes into the video)
○ Human Resources: 100 million (?) mobilized for the war; but hundreds of millions
on the homefront; all participants, all targets
○ Who will fight and who will work? Socio-political…
● Mobilizing Women to Fight and Work
○ Need for combatants took many men out of the workplace
○ Women? A good measure of total war and the frictions that limited their use
○ Why would women not be used? Be used?
○ Almost all states did not use women for combat; some anti-aircraft functions-not
shooting/killing!
○ Russia an exception-women performed all military functions in combat;
communist pragmatic egalitarianism: work and fight
○ Work: all states allowed women tp work although Germany seemed hesitant:
“Kinder, Kuche, Kirche” (Children, Church, Kitchen) was the Nazi mantra. But
more German women were working than British women
● Forced or Slave Labor
○ To avoid stressing the homefront, Germany hoped to exploit the resources of
occupied and “collaborative” states; 20% of Germany’s GDP came from outside
of Germany; eg. France provided food and other resources while it went without
○ Foreign workers (“voluntary” or conscripted)
○ POWs and Concentration camp inmates used as labor
○ Over the course of the war 12 million (7 million in 1944 alone)
○ Russia “militarized labor”; failure to perform was treason
● Legislated Service or the Free Market
○ Britain immediately passed the National Service Act (Sept 3, 1939)
○ All men 18-41
○ 1941, Women included
○ Labor was conscripted
○ The US relied on a government-business alliance to enhance war production: it
worked. Few designs but many producers: eg, Sherman tanks and Liberty ships
● Fighting Total War: Germany’s Total War Strategy
○ Avoir it at home: exploit the conquered lands
○ Quick European victory would have rendered the need for extensive naval
operation unnecessary: failure of Battle of Britain; hard Russian resistance and
the US entry into the war demanded an attritional strategy
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller huntergauthier. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for CA$11.06. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
Can Stuvia be trusted?
4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
53340 documents were sold in the last 30 days
Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now