100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
2022 JUNE Exam (Answers) - Insolvency Law (MRL3701) CA$15.83   Add to cart

Exam (elaborations)

2022 JUNE Exam (Answers) - Insolvency Law (MRL3701)

2 reviews
 81 views  2 purchases
  • Course
  • Institution

Question 1 1.1 Identify the problem / issue that was faced by the court in Magnum Financial Holdings (Pty) Ltd (in liquidation) v Summerly and another NNO 1984 (1) SA 160 (W) and give reasons why the court in this case was satisfied that the applicants had made out a case for the relief sought. (5...

[Show more]
Last document update: 2 year ago

Preview 3 out of 9  pages

  • June 22, 2022
  • June 22, 2022
  • 9
  • 2021/2022
  • Exam (elaborations)
  • Questions & answers

2  reviews

review-writer-avatar

By: SUZANNIE14 • 2 year ago

review-writer-avatar

By: Sinthle • 2 year ago

Good

avatar-seller
2022 JUNE EXAM ANSWERS
Semester 1




INSOLVENCY
LAW
MRL3701

, ACADEMIC HONESTY DECLARATION

1. I understand what academic dishonesty entails and am aware of Unisa’s policies in this regard.

2. I declare that this assignment is my own, original work. Where I have used someone else’s work, I have
indicated this by using the prescribed style of referencing. Every contribution to, and quotation in, this
assignment from the work or works of other people has been referenced according to the prescribed style.

3. I have not allowed, and will not allow, anyone to copy my work with the intention of passing it off as his
or her own work.

4. I did not make use of another student’s work and submit it as my own.

NAME: ……………………………………………………………………………………...
SIGNATURE: ……………………………………………………………………………...
STUDENT NUMBER: ……………………………………………………………………..
MODULE CODE: ...............................................................................................
DATE: ……………………………………………………………………………………....
RESEARCH THEME SELECTED: ………………………………………………………
MARK RECEIVED FOR ASSIGNMENT 01: …………………………………………..
MARK RECEIVED FOR ASSIGNMENT 02: …………………………………………...

, Question 1


1.1 Identify the problem / issue that was faced by the court in Magnum Financial Holdings (Pty) Ltd
(in liquidation) v Summerly and another NNO 1984 (1) SA 160 (W) and give reasons why the
court in this case was satisfied that the applicants had made out a case for the relief sought. (5)


The only problem before the court was whether a trust could, at law, be sequestrated.


The reasons why the court was satisfied that the applicants had made out a case for the relief sought
was the following:


There had been sufficient service of the papers on the trustee of the trust.
The one provisional liquidator of the applicant company had locus standi to apply for the
provisional sequestration of the trust estate.
The applicant company had a claim against the trust for about R1.6 million which was due and
payable.
An act of insolvency in terms of section 8(g) had been committed, and the trust estate was also
insolvent.
It was to the advantage of the trust’s creditors that its estate be sequestrated urgently.
Further, the necessary security bond had been duly lodged and also annexed to the court
papers.


1.2 Dumisani approaches you for advice. He informs you that his brother, Benson, owes him R24
000 for gardening services rendered by his company. Dumisani explains to you that despite
various attempts to get Benson to pay his debts, he has yet to make any payment. Dumisani is
especially upset because he has heard a rumour that Benson and his wife have apparently
relocated their home from Johannesburg to Cape Town because his wife is ill and needs medical
treatment at a care facility in Stellenbosch.

Dumisani wants to know from you whether you can assist him to apply for the compulsory
sequestration of Benson’s estate, because his brother has fled from his home and therefore his
responsibilities. Refer to the relevant act of insolvency, including a reference to the relevant
legislation. (10)


Section 9(1) allows proceeding for the compulsory sequestration of a debtor instituted by a
creditor who has a liquidated claim for not less than R100. In terms of the above Dumisani may
apply as he is owed R24 000 from Benson. According to section 8(a) the debtor commits an act

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller StudyAssistant036. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for CA$15.83. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

67474 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
CA$15.83  2x  sold
  • (2)
  Add to cart