Summary
Summary The rise and fall of the Athenian Empire
- Course
- Ancient Greece (HIST2210)
- Institution
- Langara College ( )
HIST 2210 Ancient Greece Topic :(The rise and fall of the Athenian Empire) summary
[Show more]
Seller
Follow
Content preview
The rise and fall of the Athenian EmpireThe eastern Greeks of the islands and central area felt themselves especially
helpless and spoke to the regular chief, Sparta. The Spartans' proposed
arrangement was an unsatisfactory arrangement to clear Ionia and resettle its Greek
occupants somewhere else; this would have been a striking usurpation of Athens'
frontier or pseudocolonial job as well as a horrible disturbance for the people in
question. Samos, Chios, Lesbos, and different islanders were gotten into the Greek
union. The situation with the mainlanders was briefly left in tension, however not
for a really long time: in mid 478 Athens for its own caught Sestus, still under
tricky Persian control until now. In doing so it was helped by "partners from Ionia
and the Hellespont" — in other words, including mainlanders. The expert for this
assertion, which ought not be questioned, is Thucydides, the fundamental aide for a
large portion of the following 70 years.
The fortress of Athens
The catch of Sestus was one sign of Athenian autonomy from Spartan
administration, which had gone unchallenged by Athens in the Persian Wars of
480-479, with the exception of a couple of uncomfortable minutes when it had
appeared to be that Sparta was hesitant to go north of the Isthmus. Another sign
was the enthusiastic structure in the mid 470s of a legitimate arrangement of walls
,for the city of Athens, an episode extravagantly depicted by Thucydides to show
the trickiness of Themistocles, who misdirected the Spartans over the undertaking.
Whether the walls were completely new or a substitution for an Archaic circuit is
questioned; Thucydides infers that there was a previous circuit, however no hint of
this has been laid out archeologically. The Themistoclean circuit, then again, gets
by, albeit the strength of the socle doesn't exactly confirm Thucydides' sensational
image of an unrehearsed "everyone available and jumping into action" activity did
with amateurish materials.
Sparta's hesitance to see Athens strengthened and its annoyance — hid however
genuine — after the irreversible occasion show that and still, at the end of the day,
regardless of its mindful demeanor to the central area Ionians, Sparta was unsettled
to see Athens take over totally its own prevailing military job. Or on the other hand
rather, a few Spartans were troubled, for it is an element of this period that Sparta
wobbled among noninterference and dominion, assuming that is the right word for
an objective sought after with such discontinuous energy. This wobbling is best
made sense of in factional terms, the subtleties of which evade the 21st 100 years
as they did Thucydides. Thucydides regrettably compares the wall-building
episode, with its unmistakable ramifications of Spartan forcefulness, with the dull
explanation that the Spartans were happy to be freed of the Persian conflict and
considered the Athenians capable of administration and all around arranged toward
,themselves. As a matter of fact, there is proof in other scholarly hotspots for the
first and all the more outward-looking strategy, like a report of an inside banter at
Sparta about the general inquiry of authority, as well as specific demonstrations,
for example, a Spartan endeavor to remove Medizers from the Delphic
Amphictyony — i.e., load it with its own allies.
The aspiration of Pausanias
One effectively recognizable calculate the development of Spartan strategy is an
individual one: the desires of Pausanias, a young fellow flushed from his prosperity
at Plataea. Pausanias was one of those Spartans who needed to see the catalyst of
the Persian Wars kept up with; he vanquished a lot of Cyprus (a brief victory) and
laid attack to Byzantium. Be that as it may, his presumption and ordinarily Spartan
viciousness enraged different Greeks, "not least," Thucydides says, "the Ionians
and the recently freed populaces." Those presently moved toward Athens in
excellence of family relationship, requesting that it lead them.
That was a critical crossroads in fifth century history; the prompt impact was to
compel the Spartans to review Pausanias and put him being investigated. He was
accused of "Medism," and, however cleared for the occasion, he was supplanted by
Dorcis. However Dorcis and others like him missing the mark on's moxy, and
Sparta conveyed two additional commandants. Pausanias went out again to
, Byzantium "in a confidential limit," setting himself up as a dictator to interest with
Persia, yet he was again reviewed and starved to death in the wake of having taken
safe-haven in the sanctuary of Athena of the Brazen House in Sparta. (The end
might not have come until late during the 470s.) The charge was again Medism,
and there was a reality to it on the grounds that the prizes given by Persia to
Gongylus of Eretria, one of his colleagues, can be displayed to have been
verifiable. There was likewise a doubt that Pausanias was coordinating an
ascending of the helots, "and it was valid," Thucydides says,Despite its triumphs in
479, Sparta, then, was as much a detainee of the helot issue as could be, and it
couldn't depend on the reliability of Arcadia or the Peloponnese for the most part:
Mantinea and Elis had sent their contingents to the Battle of Plataea dubiously late.
The Delian League
The main result of the fruitful Greek enticement for Athens was the start of the
Athenian realm, or Delian League (the last option is a cutting edge articulation).
The enticement for Ionian connection set the vibe for the association and for a lot
of its ensuing history, however one can decently gripe that this doesn't arise
emphatically enough from Thucydides, who generally tends to underreport the
strict or wistful calculate Greek legislative issues.
Honoring Athens
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller pankajkhatri191l. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for CA$6.68. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
Can Stuvia be trusted?
4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
56326 documents were sold in the last 30 days
Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now