100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Previously searched by you
Previously searched by you
logo
AQA Philosophy A-level: Eliminative Materialism essay plan (metaphysics of Mind) CA$5.49   Add to cart
Quickly navigate to
Preview
  2.  
  3. AQA
  4.  
  5. Philosophy
  6.  
  7. Metaphysics of Mind (60306841)

Essay

AQA Philosophy A-level: Eliminative Materialism essay plan (metaphysics of Mind)

 108 views  1 purchase
  • Course
  • Metaphysics of Mind (60306841)
  • Institution
  • AQA

This is an essay plan for Eliminative Materialism within the Metaphysics of Mind unit of Philosophy AQA a-level. - unique and strong argument that will help you stand out - Comes with a written introduction and conclusion - 3 core arguments with back and forth counterarguments, to get A03 m...

[Show more]

Preview 1 out of 1  pages

Document information

  • October 17, 2022
  • 1
  • 2022/2023
  • Essay
  • Unknown
  • A+

Subjects

  • philosophy
  • aqa
  • a level
  • paper 2
  • year 2
  • philosophy of mind
  • metaphysics of mind
  • eliminative materialism
  • david crane
  • kim sterelny
  • folk psychology
  • paul churchland
  • patricia churchland
  • exam plan
  • essay plan
  • 2

Written for

  • A/AS Level
  • AQA
  • Philosophy
  • Metaphysics of Mind (60306841)
All documents for this subject (23)

Seller

avatar-seller
sashamortonsmyth

Reviews received

Content preview

ASSESS ELIMINATIVE MATERIALISM
INTRO: Outline Eliminative materialism and Folk Psychology
Eliminative materialism faces problems as a theory of the mind as Folk psychology
overcomes the justi cations eliminativists use to reject it. However, the defeating issue is
that FP concepts can never been fully eliminated as Eliminativism is self-refuting.
1. ASSES ELIMINATIVIST’S REASONS FOR REJECTING FOLK PSYCHOLOGY,

Not coherent with other scienti c knowledge
CRANE: still use original terms
Weak




➢ Actions can be explained through causes in neurobiology, BUT we don’t need to remove our
original terms.

Arguably what EM says:
➢ Churchland isn’t denying existence of the mental phenomena we refer to as ‘beliefs’, ‘pain’,
‘thought’, etc., he’s just saying this FP isn’t the technically correct theory as to their nature.
Minor




Stagnant & Unproductive
➢ There has been no progress made in FP since ancient Greek times.

CRANE: Nothing came along to refute it
➢ Seems stagnant is because it is a ne theory of the mind and how it works. Evidence has not
come along to refute it so it has not needed to change.

Neuroscience?
Stronger




STERELNY: It has adapted and changed
➢ We now commonly discuss why people do things in terms of subconscious desires (FP term
for this is freudian slips). We can also see how subconscious desires occur in neuronal
activity. Therefore, FP is in line with new scienti c theories such as neuroscience.
Signi cant issue




Explanatory failures
➢ Can’t explain things like mental illness, sleep or learning.

Good explanatory + predictive power
➢ FP makes more accurate predications about how people behave than even the best
neuroscientists could. Therefore FP has better practical application.



2. ASSESS ELIMINATIVE MATERIALISM, IN ORDER TO SECURE THE IDEA FP IS STRONGER

EM = self refuting
➢ Churchland is expressing his belief (FP concept) in the truth of EM - showing beliefs exist
Defeating




Commits the fallacy of begging the question
➢ It assumes the very things it’s trying to prove: beliefs exist. Churchland could just reply that
what his opponent is calling a belief is actually something else (neuroscience explanation).

Even discussing requires (FP concept) intentionally
➢ It’s not clear how neuroscience could ever o er an alternative account of intentionality, and
so folk psychology cannot ever be fully eliminated.

Eliminative materialism fails as a theory of the mind as Folk psychology concepts not only hold better
explanatory power and practical application, but also these concepts can never been fully eliminated as
philosophical discussion requires intentionality (FP concept).

fi fi fi ff fi fi

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller sashamortonsmyth. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for CA$5.49. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

77764 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
CA$5.49  1x  sold
  • (0)
  Add to cart