100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Summary Summaries of all lecture notes in APM346, you will be good to go if you are able to understand everything shown in the notes CA$11.80
Add to cart

Summary

Summary Summaries of all lecture notes in APM346, you will be good to go if you are able to understand everything shown in the notes

 2 views  0 purchase

Summaries of all lecture notes in APM346, you will be good to go if you are able to understand everything shown in the notes

Preview 2 out of 11  pages

  • December 12, 2022
  • 11
  • 2019/2020
  • Summary
All documents for this subject (11)
avatar-seller
9kfhgia89h1
May 26, 2020 APM346 – Week 4 Justin Ko


1 Properties of the Wave Equation on R
Recall that the solution to

2
utt − c uxx = f (x, t)
 x ∈ R, t > 0,
u|t=0 = g(x) x ∈ R, (1)

ut |t=0 = h(x) x ∈ R.


is given by d’Alembert’s formula
x+ct Z tZ x+c(t−s)
g(x + ct) + g(x − ct)
Z
1 1
u(x, t) = + h(s) ds + f (y, s) dyds. (2)
2 2c x−ct 2c 0 x−c(t−s)

We can use this formula to derive several nice properties satisfied by the solutions to (1).

1.1 Causality
When f ≡ 0, d’Alembert’s formula implies that waves propagate at speed c.
1. Domain of Influence: If f ≡ 0, g(x0 ) and h(x0 ) only affect the solution to (1) on the sector

4+ (x0 , 0) = {(x, t) : x0 − ct ≤ x ≤ x0 + ct}.

2. Domain of Dependence: The solution to (1) at (x0 , t0 ) only depends on f, g, h on the triangle

4(x0 , t0 ) = {(x, t) ∈ R × R+ : x0 − c(t0 − t) ≤ x ≤ x0 + c(t0 − t)}.

t t

x = x0 + c(t0 − t) x = x0 − c(t0 − t)

∆+ (x0 , t0 )



x = x0 − ct x = x0 + ct ∆

x x
x0



Proposition 1 (Causality )
Suppose f (x, t) ≡ 0.
1. If g(x) and h(x) vanish for |x| > R, then u(x, t) = 0 for x, t such that |x| > R + ct.
2. If g(x) and h(x) vanish for |x − x0 | < R then u(x, t) = 0 for all x, t ∈ 4(x0 , Rc ).


Proof. When f ≡ 0, the wave equation is determined by the characteristic lines x − ct = C1 and
x + ct = C2 . The domain of influence and domain of dependence are simply the regions separated by
the characteristic lines through the points x0 and t0 . Part (2) follows by revisting the derivation of
the first two terms in d’Alembert’s formula and part (1) is the “inverse” restatement of part (2).
Remark 1. In higher dimensions, the domains of influence and dependence are cones.

Remark 2. The propagation speed of the wave equation can also be proved independently of D’Alembert’s
formula using a local energy argument.


Page 1 of 11

, May 26, 2020 APM346 – Week 4 Justin Ko


1.2 Well-Posed
If we assume some regularity properties on the initial conditions, then d’Alembert’s formula implies
there exists a C 2 (R) solution to (1). In fact, with a bit of work, we can show that the solutions are
also unique and stable.
Proposition 2
If g ∈ C 2 (R), h ∈ C(R), and f is integrable then the IVP (1) is well-posed.


Proof. We check the three conditions that define a well-posed solution.

Existence: The existence of a solution with continuous second derivative follows immediately from
d’Alembert’s formula (2).

Uniqueness: We use an energy argument to prove uniqueness.

Difference of Solutions: Suppose u1 and u2 are C 2 (R) solutions to (1). By linearity, v = u1 − u2
solves 
2
vtt − c vxx = 0,
 x ∈ R, t > 0
v|t=0 = 0 x∈R (3)

vt |t=0 = 0 x ∈ R.


To prove uniqueness, it suffices to show that v ≡ 0 on the domain of the solution.

Show the Energy is Zero: We consider the energy of the solution v to (3),

1 ∞ 2
Z
v + c2 vx2 dx.

E(t) =
2 −∞ t

Since the initial conditions are 0, the energy is finite so we differentiate under the integral sign with
respect to t to see
Z ∞
E 0 (t) = vt vtt + c2 vx vxt dx

−∞
Z ∞
2
vtt − c2 vxx = 0

=c vt vxx + vx vxt dx
−∞
Z ∞
2

=c (vx vt )x dx (vx vt )x = vxx vt + vx vxt
−∞
 
= lim vx (y, t)vt (y, t) − vx (−y, t)vt (−y, t)
y→∞

= 0,

since the wave equation has finite propagation speed Proposition 1 (the initial conditions vanish outside
for |x| > 1), so limy→±∞ vx (y, t) = 0 for every fixed t. Since E 0 (t) = 0, we can conclude that E(t) is
constant by the mean value theorem. Furthermore, the initial conditions imply

1 ∞ 2
Z
vt (x, 0) + c2 vx2 (x, 0) dx = 0

E(0) =
2 −∞

because vt (x, 0) = 0 and v(x, 0) = 0 =⇒ vx (x, 0) = 0. Combined with the fact E(t) is constant, we
have
E(t) = 0 for all t.


Page 2 of 11

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller 9kfhgia89h1. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for CA$11.80. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

52355 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
CA$11.80
  • (0)
Add to cart
Added