100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Previously searched by you
Previously searched by you
logo
Summary STA130 Final Aid Sheet CA$12.93   Add to cart
Quickly navigate to
Preview
  2.  
  3. University Of Toronto (U Of T )
  4.  
  5. Statistics
  6.  
  7. STA130 (STA130)

Summary

Summary STA130 Final Aid Sheet
 9 views  0 purchase

This document contains the content of STA130 studied between the midterm and final. This includes linear regression, classification trees and ethics in data science / statistics. This aid sheet assisted me in getting an A+ on the final. Feel free to use this as inspiration for layout/content to inc...

[Show more]

Preview 1 out of 2  pages

Document information

  • January 17, 2023
  • 2
  • 2022/2023
  • Summary

Subjects

Written for

All documents for this subject (3)

Seller

avatar-seller
ralwab

Reviews received

Content preview

Sample Correlation r • Measures linear association between two variables (x1, y1)
cor($, $) • Correlation is a version of standardised covariance
• Standardising: a rule that will put something on a certain scale (for r it’s always -1 ≤ r ≤ 1 → special case
r=0 means not detected)
Equations (expected Simple Linear Regression Model / Normal Model - General way of predicting continuous values
value E… but actual Parameters of a Normal Model (2 parameters: location (mean) & spread (variance)):
value is Y) • β0: ‘Y if x is 0’ intercept parameter
• β1: slope parameter
Intercept and Slope / • ϵi: random ‘noise’ / ‘error’ term
Regression Coefficients • xi: predictor, feature, covariate, explanatory/independent variable
/ Parameters • Yi: response, outcome, dependent variable
Fitting SLR models • Theoretically ϵi is error term, but in model it’s
(optimization) ‘residual’
ϵi {hat}= yi − y{hat}i → residual
• Optimization → Least squares (method for finding
best coefficients) | want smallest sum of squared
residuals
Fitted Regression Line lm(response ~ predictor, data=)
geom_smooth(method=lm, se=FALSE) → se is standard error
R2 (Coefficient of • It’s the “Proportion of Variation Explained” is a Measure of Model Fit - proportion reduction in the squared residuals
Determination) • R2 tells us how much of the variation in y can be explained by taking x into account | (Var(mean of y) - Var(fit - taking x into
account))/Var(mean of y)




Indicator Variables ex. lm(heights ~ sex, data=heights) | β{hat} is called a contrast as it captures a difference between groups




Scaling Choosing x is an arbitrary choice (can be anything and output & r is still the same)
Hypothesis Testing in SLR (depends on Normal Model=TRUE) H0:β1=0 | HA:β1≠0 | ɑ=0.05 | entails normality, homoscedasticity, independence, linearity assumptions
→ Confidence Intervals on Regression Coefficient values are then also possible
Multivariate Linear Review: Rˆ2 (mathematically can’t do worse than
Regression vs SLR (1 original predictor so → more explanatory variables =
variable) more parameters = larger R2) and Indicator Variables,
• baseline groups→ number that serves as a
reasonable starting point for comparison purposes
(see effects of change)
• rowid_to_column() → adds a column at the start of
the dataframe of ascending sequential row ids starting
at 1

Confounds, • Multicollinearity (variables are highly correlated amongst themselves) = Observed Confounding → A multivariate linear regression model can’t detangle
multicollinearity & p-values contributions of correlated (positive or negative) variables (correlation matrix). eg. x1 & x2 are identical→ difference?
Multicollinearity: observable association prohibits effect attribution | Confounding: unobserved variable association would prohibit effect attribution (-ethics)
• Doesn’t matter for prediction (ML) | Lose statistical power with statistical inference
• stronger p-value, stronger evidence against NULL hypothesis. Outcomes can be explained individually, but p-values get weaker with more variables →
model can't tell which variable to attribute cause/explanation/effect to, statistical strength decreases
• Two variables are confounded if they can explain the 3rd variable (eg. sex in length of shoe vs height) - facet_wrap
Stat/Practical Significance • Statistical → effect (for hypothesis testing you can just collect more data to eventually reject the NULL)
• Practical → does the difference matter? Eg. zooming out of 2 slopes and the difference is small (can make it 1 line instead?)

80/20 Train-Test Split • Split representative population sample into two representative samples → 1. You fit the model based on a "representative" sample → 2
(Alternative Method → So subsamples are "representative of the population" → 3 Use 80% of the data to fit the "representative" model (training) → 4 Use 20%
not just R2) is used to to see if the model’s actually "representative" (test)
find which model • If data doesn’t work well for the 20% → either subsamples weren’t representative to start with | model memorised the 80% (too specific)
performs better. Subject • Overfitting data means a random chance pattern gets interpreted as a real pattern (overly memorising data it has)
to “random chance” • Underfitting model’s not good enough yet (predictions could be improved)
• Model is less complex = better estimation. eg. slope coefficient variable (worst) vs indicator variable (best) vs both variables (2nd best)
For Model Comparison • There was not p-value evidence at the α = 0.05 significance level for lm(height~shoePrint+sex), but there was train-test evidence. & all models have good
out of sample performance (• In Sample Scoring / Out of Sample Scoring).
• Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) → RMSE: how much spread there is in
the error of the predictions. small = errors not so variable.
• normal for the test error to be higher than the train error
• is based on scoring how well a created model explains new data → How good it is at
predicting new data | How well it generalises to new data
• Prediction (RMSE) doesn’t care about confounding or multicollinearity
• Randomness → when there’s enough data so the random train-test split isn’t just "lucky"

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller ralwab. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for CA$12.93. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

83662 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
CA$12.93
  • (0)
  Add to cart