100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Previously searched by you
Previously searched by you
logo
Phil 120 Discussion Activity 2 Answer Key (All Answers are Correct) CA$11.17   Add to cart
Quickly navigate to
Preview
  2.  
  3. PHIL 120
  4.  
  5. PHIL 120

Exam (elaborations)

Phil 120 Discussion Activity 2 Answer Key (All Answers are Correct)
  • Course
  • PHIL 120
  • Institution
  • PHIL 120

Practice Quiz 2 Answer Key Determine whether each of the following contains an Ad Populum, Ad Verecundiam, or Ad Misericordiam argument. If yes, determine further whether it involves a corresponding fallacy. Answer Y (Yes) or N (No) in the corresponding blanks. For each Ad Populum fallacy indica...

[Show more]

Preview 1 out of 3  pages

Document information

  • January 19, 2023
  • 3
  • 2022/2023
  • Exam (elaborations)
  • Questions & answers

Subjects

  • ad verecundiam
  • determine fur
  • phil 120 discussion activity 2 answer key
  • practice quiz 2 answer key determine whether each of the following contains an ad populum
  • or ad misericordiam argument if yes

Written for

  • PHIL 120
All documents for this subject (13)

Seller

avatar-seller
ExamsConnoisseur

Reviews received

Content preview

Practice Quiz 2 Answer Key

Determine whether each of the following contains an Ad Populum, Ad Verecundiam, or Ad
Misericordiam argument. If yes, determine further whether it involves a corresponding fallacy. Answer
Y (Yes) or N (No) in the corresponding blanks. For each Ad Populum fallacy indicate which version of
the fallacy is involved (Popularity or Boosterism).

Question 1
Ninety percent of my constituents oppose the bill, so we may need to look more carefully at what may
be wrong with this proposal.
Ad Populum argument? [Y]
Ad Populum fallacy? [N]
Ad Verecundiam argument? [N]
Ad Verecundiam fallacy? [N]
Ad Misericordiam argument? [N]
Ad Misericordiam fallacy? [N]
Feedback: The proposed action is an advice to pay more careful attention to what may have been
overlooked in the original proposal, which is a perfectly legitimate thing to do.
(Compare: if the conclusion were something like “therefore, the proposal is plainly
wrong / an economic failure / a morally wrong thing to do”, that would clearly be a
fallacy.)

Question 2
“My fellow Americans… there has been some talk that the government is overstepping its bounds by
allowing police to enter peoples’ homes without the warrants traditionally required by the Constitution.
However, these are dangerous times and dangerous times require appropriate actions. I have in my
office thousands of letters from people who let me know, in no uncertain terms, that they heartily endorse
the war against crime in these United States. Because of this overwhelming approval, it is evident that
the police are doing the right thing.”
Ad Populum argument? [Y]
Ad Populum fallacy? [Y – Popularity]
Ad Verecundiam argument? [N]
Ad Verecundiam fallacy? [N]
Ad Misericordiam argument? [N]
Ad Misericordiam fallacy? [N]
Feedback: “It is evident that the police are doing the right thing” – this is the key here, and that
makes it a fallacy: whether or not this is right / wrong surely should be evaluated on
independent grounds.

Question 3
Sony. Ask anyone. [An advertising slogan]
Ad Populum argument? [Y]
Ad Populum fallacy? [Y – Boosterism]
Ad Verecundiam argument? [N]
Ad Verecundiam fallacy? [N]
Ad Misericordiam argument? [N]
Ad Misericordiam fallacy? [N]
Feedback: Note that this is not arguing from popularity, i.e., something like: since many people
choose it, that is why you should choose it, but the other way round: the product of
Sony is something so “elite” that this “eliteness” makes everybody choose it, thus
Boosterism rather than Popularity.

Question 4
“Those who say that astrology is not reliable are mistaken. The wisest men of history have all been
interested in astrology, and kings and queens of all ages have guided the affairs of nations by it.”



This study source was downloaded by 100000858936669 from CourseHero.com on 01-19-2023 11:46:40 GMT -06:00


https://www.coursehero.com/file/8702850/Phil-120-Discussion-Activity-2-Answer-Key/

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller ExamsConnoisseur. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for CA$11.17. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

67788 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
CA$11.17
  • (0)
  Add to cart