100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Previously searched by you
Previously searched by you
logo
Unit 3 AC2.5 Discuss the use of lay people in criminal cases CA$10.07   Add to cart
Quickly navigate to
Preview
  2.  
  3. WJEC
  4.  
  5. Criminology
  6.  
  7. Crime Scene to Courtroom

Essay

Unit 3 AC2.5 Discuss the use of lay people in criminal cases

1 review
 14 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Crime Scene to Courtroom
  • Institution
  • WJEC

AC2.5 full marks that I used in my controlled assessment and I received an A*. This writeup was marked by my 2 criminology teachers who are also Criminology Examiners.

Preview 1 out of 4  pages

Document information

  • January 31, 2023
  • 4
  • 2022/2023
  • Essay
  • Unknown
  • A+

Subjects

  • criminology
  • unit 3
  • crime scene to court room
  • a level criminology
  • controlled assessment

Written for

  • A/AS Level
  • WJEC
  • Criminology
  • Crime Scene to Courtroom
All documents for this subject (371)

1  review

review-writer-avatar

By: sadiyamahmood0 • 1 year ago

reply-writer-avatar

By: IWIS • 1 year ago

Hi, please send me a message, I would really like to know why i received this feedback, thank you!

Seller

avatar-seller
IWIS

Reviews received

Content preview

AC2.5 Writeup

‘Lay People’ is used to describe the use of ordinary, non-qualified people in the legal system. It is
believed that by using ordinary people in courts it makes the system fairer and avoids people
criticising the court for making decisions behind closed doors.



Juries

Jurors are ordinary members of the public, or lay people, without legal knowledge, who decide the
outcome of criminal cases. The eligibility for jury selection and qualification is contained in the Jury
Act 1974 and the Criminal Justice Act 2003. Jurors are randomly selected from the names on the
electoral register, are between the ages of 18 and 75, have a residency requirement of five years or
more in the UK, Channel Islands or Isle of Mann and have no recent criminal convictions.

A jury's role is to listen to the evidence and then decide the guilt or innocence of the defendant.
They are advised on the law by the judge and can take notes and ask questions, via the judge, if so
desired. The decision they make cannot be questioned. A jury must give a verdict of guilty or not
guilty – either a unanimous (all 12) or majority (minimum of 10) verdict must be reached. A hung
jury (one that cannot reach a verdict) may be discharged.

Jury duty is compulsory but there is a possibility of it being deferred for good reasons such as a
holiday, medical appointment, etc. Lawyers, judges, and other legal personnel are now able to carry
out jury service as a result of the Criminal Justice Act 2003.



Strengths

A strength of Juries is they are ordinary people who, as such can bring their own ‘justice’ or
fairness to a case (sometimes called jury equity). Even if a judge explains the law and how it
should be applied, the jury can still reach a verdict contrary to the evidence.

Jury equity can be shown in the case of R v Owen where the defendant's son was killed by a
careless driver who was given a 12-month prison sentence. The driver knocked Owen's son
off his bicycle with a 30-ton truck, which was not insured and was not roadworthy. In
addition, the driver had never passed a driving test and was blind in one eye. Owen felt the
sentence was insufficient and decided to take his own justice for the loss of his son. He
therefore shot the driver in the back and arm with a sawn-off shotgun. Charged with
attempted murder, Owen was plainly guilty as he had deliberately shot the man. However,
the jury understood why he had done this and decided to acquit him.

Later, some members of the jury congratulated him. This was the jury's verdict and nothing
could be done about it.

Another strength of the jury system is that it is popular with the public, who have confidence
in the system as they are aware it is ordinary members of the public playing such an
important role in the criminal justice system. This right to be tried by your peers is enshrined
in our history and is seen as a democratic right. Moves to withdraw it for minor offences of
theft were met with great resistance.

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller IWIS. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for CA$10.07. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

77858 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
CA$10.07
  • (1)
  Add to cart