Summary

Summary Economic Methodology - ENDTERM UVA EBE (Grade: 9.5)

67 views 6 purchases

Course
Economic Methodology (6012B0454Y)

Institution
Universiteit Van Amsterdam (UvA)

Book
Economic Methodology

This document is a summary of everything you need to know for the course Economic Methodology (course code: 6012B0454Y) at the University of Amsterdam. This course is taught in the second year of the bachelor Economics and Business Economics and is taught by Dr. Dirk Damsma. In this course chapter ...

[Show more]

Preview 1 out of 13 pages

View example

Summarized whole book? Yes
Uploaded on February 5, 2023
Number of pages 13
Written in 2022/2023
Type Summary

6012b0454y
9781137545558
boumans
davis
2nd edition
isbn
university
amsterdam
university of amsterdam
damsma
dirk damsma
vermeylen
lect
conomic methodology understanding economics as a science
uva
of

Book Title:Economic Methodology

Author(s):Marcel Boumans, John Davis

Edition:november 2015
ISBN:9781137545558
Edition:1

Class notes
College aantekeningen Economic Methodology (6012B0454Y) Economic Methodology
Summary
Full exam summary for Economic methodology
Summary
Summary Economic Methodology (all chapters + additional info from lectures)

Institution
Universiteit van Amsterdam (UvA)
Education
Economics and Business Administration
Course
Economic Methodology (6012B0454Y)

Helena0207

Member since 2 year 191 documents sold

CA$11.48

Added

Add to cart

Add to wishlist

100% satisfaction guarantee
Immediately available after payment
Both online and in PDF
No strings attached

Lecture 1: The received view
Science is the result of scientific research: explanations, descriptions, measurements, predictions or recommendations.
Theories try to make sense of a reality; science studies study those theories.

• Demarcation = the process by which we distinguish between science and non-science using some criterion. the action
of fixing the boundary or limits of something.
• Ontology = philosophical discussion about the nature of reality → influences your world view and thus the product of
your science → in mainstream economics: the individual is the essence of society (rather than vice versa).
• Epistemology = philosophical study of the nature of knowledge → where to start your research.
• Sociology of science = approach to scientists that tries not to take any ontological or epistemological positions → go
about research as is you’re an anthropologist and find out about their beliefs.
• Positive science = science that is focused on describing/explaining/predicting phenomena → facts.
• Normative science = science that is focused on prescriptions and recommendations → norms.

There was general enthusiasm for the German unification in Austria, which was something Hitler was also after. The
publication of Mein Kampf gave a defense for their ideals and thus was embraced. Hitler’s ideas were taught at universities.
This led to a very difficult climate for the Jewish professors. There came a Jewish reply: the wissenschaftliche
Weltauffassung (Scientific World View). This world view tried to give a radical foundation for science and tried to stop
antisemitism. The radical foundation they gave was for scientists to stick to the facts, to the things you can observe. Der
Wiener Kreis (The Vienna Circle) formulated the idea that science should stick to the facts and that those facts should be
checkable through observation.

Statements/propositions can be…
• Synthetic a posteriori = empirically verifiable: ascertaining truth by observation → verifiable with sense data →
meaningful
• Analytic = logically verifiable: ascertaining truth by logical analysis → true by definition or logic → meaningful
• Synthetic a priori = statement about the world that cannot be evaluated by observations or logic in the world and that
is not verifiable with sense data (= observations using your five senses). → not meaningful
Synthetic statements are statements that say something about the world.

The two foundations (demarcation criterion) of Logical Empiricism/Positivism / The Received View:
1. Logical analysis → one should construct a theory and test for inconsistencies
2. Empiricism: Observation and Measurement → check if consistent theory holds in the world (operationalizations
needed).
a. Statement has to be empirically verifiable
b. Statement has been verified → observed in the world.
The demarcation criterion for the Logical Positivists was: scientific statements can be independently verified using logic
and/or observation. Science only involves analytic and synthetic a posteriori propositions, and not synthetic a priori
propositions. The logical positivists were anti-metaphysical (= the branch of philosophy that thinks about things that we
can't observe in the world).

Operationalization = deconstruction of a theoretical concept in its observational counterparts/categories (using
correspondence rules)
Correspondence rule: Theoretical Concept = Definition(OC1, OC2, OC3, OC4). Where OC = observable category.
However, often a theoretical concept can be measured in a lot of different ways! → impossible to find unrestricted
generalizations.
Operationalism = if a theoretical concept is measured in different ways, it is in fact not the same concept.
Often, we want to make statements about the world using terminology / entities that are theoretical and not directly
observable. If we want to say something scientific about them, we have to make them observable by agreeing on a
correspondence rule (= definition of the term that puts it into observable categories).

Logical positivists were not interested in the context of discovery (= the way in which a theory is found) but were interested
in the context of justification (= the verification of the truth of a theory; the way how synthetic statements are verified).

The logical positivists’ ideas for a proper structure for scientific explanations and predictions is summarized in the
Deductive Nomological Model/Explanation, constructed by Carl Hempel. It was the standard model for explanations that
logical positivists used.
Explanans (1) Lawlike proposition ∀x[A(x) → B(x)]
(2) Conditions A(a)
Explanandum (3) Phenomenon to explain B(a)

Page 1 of 13

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller Helena0207. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for CA$11.48. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

75632 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling

Summary

Summary Economic Methodology - ENDTERM UVA EBE (Grade: 9.5)

Document information

Subjects

Connected book

More summaries for

Written for

Seller

Reviews received

Content preview