100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Previously searched by you
Previously searched by you
logo
PHI2043 (Business Ethics) Notes CA$9.79
Add to cart
Quickly navigate to
Preview
  2.  
  3. University Of Cape Town (UCT)
  4.  
  5. PHI2043 - Business Ethics (PHI2043)

Class notes

PHI2043 (Business Ethics) Notes

1 review
 533 views  12 purchases
  • Course
  • PHI2043 - Business Ethics (PHI2043)
  • Institution
  • University Of Cape Town (UCT)
  • Book
  • Business Ethics and Other Paradoxes

This is a complete and comprehensive summary of all content covered in PHI2043 (Business Ethics) lectures from week 1 to week 11 of the course. The notes are really helpful for keeping up during the semester, tutorial/forum contributions, essay writing and test/exam preparation. The author achieved...

[Show more]

Preview 2 out of 28  pages

Document information

  • March 8, 2023
  • 28
  • 2022/2023
  • Class notes
  • Gabriele james
  • All classes

Subjects

  • phi2043
  • phi2043f
  • phi2043s
  • business ethics
  • ethics
  • philosophy
  • uct

Connected book

book image

Book Title:

Author(s):

  • Edition:
  • ISBN:
  • Edition:

Written for

  • University of Cape Town (UCT)
  • PHI2043 - Business Ethics (PHI2043)
All documents for this subject (2)

1  review

review-writer-avatar

By: juliacarolinewilliams9 • 1 year ago

Seller

avatar-seller
stuviasisters

Reviews received

Content preview

Business Ethics Notes
Gabriele James


Week 1: Lecture 2

• Ethics is the study of morality, right/wrong, or the code of conduct of a group.
• Moral standards = Moral norms/right actions derived from moral principles regarding
harm, freedom, equality, justice, etc.
• Immoral/unethical = An act which is morally wrong/falls short of a moral standard. The
act is ethically impermissible.
• Amoral = An act to which no moral standards apply (primarily self-regarding, possibly
prescriptive language). The act is morally permissible.
• Amoral issues may appear to be moral issues due to strong emotions.
• Moral/ethical = An act which is morally right/meets a moral standard. The act is morally
permissible and morally required (not doing it is impermissible).
• Supererogatory = An act which exceeds a moral standard. The act is morally permissible,
but not morally required (you are not obliged to perform them, seen as heroic).
• Descriptive claims = Describe how things are.
• Normative claims = Prescribe what ought to be the case.
• Some normative questions have obvious answers. Even when answers are difficult to
find, it doesn’t mean they don’t exist (therefore, normative moral facts do exist).
• Moral facts = Moral/ethical claims that are true. They are objective (even when facts are
harder to find, their nature does not change).


Week 1: Lecture 3

• Emotivism/boo-hurrah theory:
- Ethical claims are merely expressions of emotion (how we feel guides our moral
choices, people disagree about grey areas). Thus, normative moral facts do not exist.
- The implication that there are no moral facts is difficult to accept when it comes to
obvious moral standards (e.g., murder is wrong).
- It is inconsistent to hold that emotivism is only true of grey areas.
• Moral relativism:
- Normative moral facts exist. What makes these facts true or false is whether a group
believes them or not (the truth of moral claims is relative to a community).
- Moral facts are subjective.
- Promotes tolerance (you can be open-minded about the cultural practices of others).
- Acts that most would agree are immoral cannot be considered universally ethically
impermissible, as long as some group of people believe the act to be permissible
(thus, there are no universal moral facts).
- Espouses that facts are established by mere belief.
- Provides no practical guidance when groups within a society have conflicting views.

, • Doctrine of divine command:
- Normative moral facts are determined by the will of god.
- Moral facts are subjective.
- The dilemma is that we don’t know whether morality is willed by god because it is
moral, or whether it is moral because it is willed by god.
- If god’s will were different, then moral standards would be different.
- If there are some things we can’t imagine god willing, it suggests that morality is
independent of god’s will.
- Rejecting divine command theory doesn’t refute god’s omnipotence (it has limits).
• The best tool to discover moral facts is critical thinking.
• We can’t be ethical by simply following the law, because the law can require/permit
immoral acts, and the law requires interpretation.
• Even if religion is not a source of moral truths, it may be a good place starting point to
seek ethical guidance. We should apply critical thinking where religious advice must be
interpreted to apply to a specific moral dilemma.
• Following your gut/intuition may not always push you in the right direction, as it is
influenced by various irrelevant factors (e.g., mood, experiences), and does not give us
access to reasons for our actions.


Week 2: Lecture 1

• Critical thinking = The ability to apply the methods of logical reasoning/argumentation.
• Scepticism = Consideration of the value of conventional ideas; a dedication to only
accepting answers that are supported by sound arguments.
• Logical reasoning = Giving good reasons to accept our arguments.
• Structure of an argument:
- Conclusion (the claim you are giving reasons in support of).
- Premise/s (the reasons you are giving to support your argument).
- We formalise arguments to see the relationship between the conclusion and
premise/s, and to find where the problem lies before refuting an argument.
• Valid argument = If the provided premise/s are true, the truth of the conclusion is
guaranteed (conclusion follows from premise/s, or premise/s entail conclusion).
• Valid arguments can be absurd (if the premise/s are not, in fact, true).
• Deductive argument = Making an inference based on widely-accepted facts/premises.
Guarantee that the conclusion is true if the premises are true.
• Validity of deductive arguments:
- A = B. B = C. Therefore, A = C.
- If A, then B. A. Therefore, B (modus ponens).
• Sound argument = Valid arguments with true premises.
• Proving arguments to be unsound/testing for soundness:
- Show that the argument is invalid.
- Show that the premise/s are not necessarily true.

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller stuviasisters. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for CA$9.79. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

57413 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
CA$9.79  12x  sold
  • (1)
Add to cart
Added