Exam (elaborations)

Summary LPC Notes Advanced Commercial Litigation Revision notes (Distinction) 2022

0 purchase

Course
LPC

Institution
LPC

Contents Logic 8 Express Terms – Identification (1) 8 By Signature 8 I – THE EFFECT OF SIGNATURE 8 L‟Estrange v F Graucob Ltd [1934] 2 KB 394 8 II – EXCEPTIONS TO THE SIGNATURE RULE 9 Curtis v Chemical Cleaning & Dyeing [1951] 1 KB 805 10 Toll (FGCT) v Alphapharm (2004) 219 CLR...

[Show more]

Preview 4 out of 285 pages

View example

Uploaded on March 27, 2023
Number of pages 285
Written in 2022/2023
Type Exam (elaborations)
Contains Questions & answers

lpc
summary lpc notes advanced commercial litigation revision notes distinction 2022

FLOYYD

Member since 4 year 232 documents sold

CA$26.29

Add to cart

Add to wishlist

100% satisfaction guarantee
Immediately available after payment
Both online and in PDF
No strings attached

Summary LPC Notes Advanced Commercial Litigation
Revision notes (Distinction) 2022

Summary LPC Notes Advanced
Commercial Litigation
Revision notes (Distinction)
2022

Contents
Logic ......................................................................................................................................... 8
Express Terms – Identification (1) .................................................................................. 8
By Signature ........................................................................................................................... 8
I – THE EFFECT OF SIGNATURE .......................................................................... 8
L‟Estrange v F Graucob Ltd [1934] 2 KB 394 .................................................. 8
II – EXCEPTIONS TO THE SIGNATURE RULE .............................................. 9
Curtis v Chemical Cleaning & Dyeing [1951] 1 KB 805 ............................ 10
Toll (FGCT) v Alphapharm (2004) 219 CLR 165 .........................................11
III – CRITICISM OF THE RULE .........................................................................13
By Notice .......................................................................................................................... 13
I – TIMING .............................................................................................................................. 14
Oceanic Sun Line Special Shipping Company v Fay (1988) 165 CLR 197. 14
II – KNOWLEDGE/NOTICE ........................................................................................ 16
Thornton v Shoe Lane Parking [1971] 2 QB 163 .........................................17
III – UNUSUAL TERMS ........................................................................................... 19
Baltic Shipping Co v Dillon (“The Mikhail Lermontov”) (1991) 22 NSWLR
1 ...................................................................................................................20
By Course of Dealing ................................................................................................... 21
Rinaldi & Patroni v Precision Mouldings (1986) WAR 131 .........................22
Balmain New Ferry v Robertson (1906) 4 CLR 379 ....................................23
Express Terms – Identification (2) ................................................................................ 24
Parol Evidence Rule ..................................................................................................... 24
I – DETERMINING WHETHER A CONTRACT IS WHOLLY WRITTEN. 24
State Rail Authority of NSW v Heath Outdoor (1986) 7 NSWLR 170 .........25
P a g e 1 | 264

,Summary LPC Notes Advanced Commercial Litigation
Revision notes (Distinction) 2022
II – EXCEPTIONS TO THE PAROL EVIDENCE RULE .................................27
Hoyt‟s v Spencer (1919) 27 CLR 133 .................................................................. 28
Saleh v Romanous [2010] NSWCA 274 ......................................................... 29
III – PRE-CONTRACTUAL STATEMENTS......................................................... 31
Equuscorp v Glengallan Investments (2004) 218 CLR 271 ........................33
JJ Savage & Sons v Blakney (1970) 119 CLR 435 .......................................34
Oscar Chess v Williams [1957] 1 WLR 370 .................................................35

P a g e 2 | 264

,Summary LPC Notes Advanced Commercial Litigation
Revision notes (Distinction) 2022
Dick Bentley Productions v Harold Smith (Motors) [1965] 2 All ER 65 ..... 36

P a g e 3 | 264

, Summary LPC Notes Advanced Commercial Litigation
Revision notes (Distinction) 2022
Express Terms – Construction ......................................................................................... 37
Principles of Construction ........................................................................................ 37
Parol Evidence Rule ..................................................................................................... 38
I– SURROUNDING CIRCUMSTANCES ............................................................ 38
Western Export Services v Jireh International [2011] HCA 45 ...................39
Electricity Generation Corporation v Woodside Energy Ltd (2014) 251
CLR 640 ......................................................................................................41
Mount Bruce Mining Pty Ltd v Wright Prospecting Pty Ltd [2015] HCA 37
................................................................................................................................................. 41
II – APPLICATION OF PRINCIPLES ................................................................... 44
Royal Botanic Gardens and Domain Trust v South Sydney City Council
(2002) 240 CLR 45......................................................................................44
Pacific Carriers v BNP Paribas (2004) 218 CLR 451...................................46
Exemption Clauses ............................................................................................................. 48
III – CONTRA PREFERENTUM ............................................................................ 48
Darlington Futures v Delco Aust (1986) 161 CLR 500................................48
IV – NEGLIGENCE ......................................................................................................... 50
Davis v Pearce Parking Station (1954) 91 CLR 642 ....................................50
V – FOUR CORNERS ................................................................................................. 52
Thomas National Transport (Melbourne) Pty Ltd v May & Baker
(Australia) Pty Ltd (1966) 115 CLR 353 ......................................................52
Implied Terms ......................................................................................................................... 53
Implied In Fact ............................................................................................................... 54
Byrne v Australian Airlines; Frew v Australian Airlines (1995) 185 CLR
410 ..............................................................................................................56
Codelfa Construction v State Rail Authority of NSW (1982) 149 CLR 337 59
Implied In Law ............................................................................................................... 61
University of Western Australia v Gray (2009) 179 FCR 346 .....................61
Implied From Custom ................................................................................................. 63
Con-Stan Industries of Aust v Norwich Winterthur Ins (Aust) (1986) 160
CLR 226 ......................................................................................................63
Australian Consumer Law (ACL) ................................................................................ 64
Overview of ACL Provisions .......................................................................................... 64
INTRODUCTION TO ACL ........................................................................................ 64
CHAPTER 2 – GENERAL PROTECTIONS .......................................................... 65
Part 2 – 1: Misleading or Deceptive Conduct (ss 18-19) ......................... 65

P a g e 4 | 264

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller FLOYYD. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for CA$26.29. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

68175 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 15 years now

Start selling

Exam (elaborations)

Summary LPC Notes Advanced Commercial Litigation Revision notes (Distinction) 2022

Document information

Subjects

Written for

Seller

Reviews received

Content preview