100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached 4.6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Exam (elaborations)

Summary LPC Notes Advanced Commercial Litigation Revision notes (Distinction) 2022

Rating
-
Sold
-
Pages
285
Grade
A+
Uploaded on
27-03-2023
Written in
2022/2023

Contents Logic 8 Express Terms – Identification (1) 8 By Signature 8 I – THE EFFECT OF SIGNATURE 8 L‟Estrange v F Graucob Ltd [1934] 2 KB 394 8 II – EXCEPTIONS TO THE SIGNATURE RULE 9 Curtis v Chemical Cleaning & Dyeing [1951] 1 KB 805 10 Toll (FGCT) v Alphapharm (2004) 219 CLR 165 11 III – CRITICISM OF THE RULE 13 By Notice 13 I – TIMING 14 Oceanic Sun Line Special Shipping Company v Fay (1988) 165 CLR 197. 14 II – KNOWLEDGE/NOTICE 16 Thornton v Shoe Lane Parking [1971] 2 QB 163 17 III – UNUSUAL TERMS 19 Baltic Shipping Co v Dillon (“The Mikhail Lermontov”) (1991) 22 NSWLR 1 20 By Course of Dealing 21 Rinaldi & Patroni v Precision Mouldings (1986) WAR 131 22 Balmain New Ferry v Robertson (1906) 4 CLR 379 23 Express Terms – Identification (2) 24 Parol Evidence Rule 24 I – DETERMINING WHETHER A CONTRACT IS WHOLLY WRITTEN. 24 State Rail Authority of NSW v Heath Outdoor (1986) 7 NSWLR 170 25 II – EXCEPTIONS TO THE PAROL EVIDENCE RULE 27 Hoyt‟s v Spencer (1919) 27 CLR 133 28 Saleh v Romanous [2010] NSWCA 274 29 III – PRE-CONTRACTUAL STATEMENTS 31 Equuscorp v Glengallan Investments (2004) 218 CLR 271 33 JJ Savage & Sons v Blakney (1970) 119 CLR 435 34 Oscar Chess v Williams [1957] 1 WLR 370 35 Dick Bentley Productions v Harold Smith (Motors) [1965] 2 All ER 65 36 Express Terms – Construction 37 Principles of Construction 37 Parol Evidence Rule 38 I – SURROUNDING CIRCUMSTANCES 38 Western Export Services v Jireh International [2011] HCA 45 39 Electricity Generation Corporation v Woodside Energy Ltd (2014) 251 CLR 640 41 Mount Bruce Mining Pty Ltd v Wright Prospecting Pty Ltd [2015] HCA 37 ................................................................................................................................................. 41 II – APPLICATION OF PRINCIPLES 44 Royal Botanic Gardens and Domain Trust v South Sydney City Council (2002) 240 CLR 45 44 Pacific Carriers v BNP Paribas (2004) 218 CLR 451 46 Exemption Clauses 48 III – CONTRA PREFERENTUM 48 Darlington Futures v Delco Aust (1986) 161 CLR 500 48 IV – NEGLIGENCE 50 Davis v Pearce Parking Station (1954) 91 CLR 642 50 V – FOUR CORNERS 52 Thomas National Transport (Melbourne) Pty Ltd v May & Baker (Australia) Pty Ltd (1966) 115 CLR 353 52 Implied Terms 53 Implied In Fact 54 Byrne v Australian Airlines; Frew v Australian Airlines (1995) 185 CLR 410 56 Codelfa Construction v State Rail Authority of NSW (1982) 149 CLR 337 59 Implied In Law 61 University of Western Australia v Gray (2009) 179 FCR 346 61 Implied From Custom 63 Con-Stan Industries of Aust v Norwich Winterthur Ins (Aust) (1986) 160 CLR 226 63 Australian Consumer Law (ACL) 64 Overview of ACL Provisions 64 INTRODUCTION TO ACL 64 CHAPTER 2 – GENERAL PROTECTIONS 65 Part 2 – 1: Misleading or Deceptive Conduct (ss 18-19) 65 Part 2 – 2: Unconscionable Conduct (ss 20-22) 65 Part 2 – 3: Unfair contract terms (ss 23-28) 66 CHAPTER 3 – SPECIFIC PROTECTIONS 69 Part 3 – 1: Unfair practices (ss 29-38) 69 Part 3 – 2: Consumer Transactions (ss 51-68) 69 CHAPTER 5 – ENFORCEMENT AND REMEDIES (ss 218-287) 71 Standard Form Contracting 73 I – INTRODUCTION 73 II – COSTS AND BENEFITS OF STANDARD FORM CONTRACTS 73 III – THE ROLE OF COMPETITION 74 IV – MARKET FAILURE AND SOCIAL FORCES 75 Frustration 76 Introduction to Frustration 76 I – THE TEST FOR FRUSTRATION 76 II – OTHER TESTS PROVIDED IN EARLIER THEORIES 77 Taylor v Caldwell [1863] EWHC QB J1 77 Krell v Henry [1903] 2 KB 740 79 Brisbane City Council v Group Projects (1979) 145 CLR 143 81 Limitations and Consequences 84 I – LIMITATIONS 84 II – CONSEQUENCES 85 Termination 85 By Agreement 85 I – ORIGINAL AGREEMENT 85 II – SUBSEQUENT AGREEMENT 86 By Failure of Contingent Condition 87 I – FOUR CATEGORIES OF CC 88 II – THE DUTY TO CO-OPERATE 89 III – CONSEQUENCES OF NON-FULFILMENT 91 IV – RESTICTIONS ON RIGHT TO TERMINATE FOR NON- FULFILMENT OF CONDITION 95 By Breach 96 I – WHAT CONSTITUTES BREACH OF CONTRACT? 96 II – TERMINATION FOR BREACH OF A CONDITION 97 Tramways Advertising v Luna Park (1938) 61 CLR 286 98 Associated Newspapers v Bancks (1951) 83 CLR 322 101 III – TERMINATION FOR BREACH OF AN INTERMEDIATE TERM 103 Hongkong Fir Shipping Co v Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha [1962] 2 QB 26 103 Ankar v National Westminster Finance (Aust) (1987) 162 CLR 549 105 Koompahtoo Local Aboriginal Land Council v Sanpine (2007) 233 CLR 115 ............................................................................................................................................... 106 By Repudiation 107 I – THE ABSENCE OF WILLINGNESS OR ABILITY 110 II – ILLUSTRATIVE CASES 111 Carr v JA Berriman (1953) 89 CLR 327 111 Progressive Mailing House v Tabali (1985) 157 CLR 17 112 Maple Flock v Universal Furniture Products (Wembley) [1934] 1 KB 148 ............................................................................................................................................... 114 DTR Nominees v Mona Homes (1978) 138 CLR 423 114 By Delay 116 I – WHERE TIME IS OF THE ESSENCE 116 II – WHERE TIME IS NOT OF THE ESSENCE 117 Louinder v Leis (1982) 149 CLR 509 119 Laurinda v Capalaba Park Shopping Centre (1989) 166 CLR 623 120 Restrictions on Termination 121 Ready and Willing 121 Foran v Wight (1989) 168 CLR 385 122 Election 124 I – GENERAL PRINCIPLES OF ELECTION 124 Tropical Traders v Goonan (1964) 111 CLR 41 126 Immer (No 145) v Uniting Church in Australia Property Trust (NSW) (1993) 182 CLR 26 128 II – AFFIRMATION 129 Consequences for Aggrieved Party 129 Consequences for Breaching Party 130 Bowes v Chaleyer (1923) 32 CLR 159 131 III – TERMINATION 132 Consequences for Aggrieved Party 132 Consequences for Breaching Party 133 IV – RIGHT TO CURE A BREACH 133 Estoppel 133 Waiver 133 Agricultural and Rural Finance Pty Ltd v Gardiner (2008) 238 CLR 570.134 Relief against Forfeiture 134 I – UNCONSCIENTIOUS EXERCISE OF LEGAL RIGHTS 135 Legione v Hateley (1983) 152 CLR 406 136 Stern v McArthur (1988) 165 CLR 489 137 Tanwar Enterprises Pty Ltd v Cauchi (2003) 217 CLR 315 138 Heads of Damage 139 Compensation Principle 139 Expectation Damages 140 I – GENERAL PRINCIPLES 140 II – DAMAGES FOR BREACH OF OBLIGATION TO RECTIFY/REPAIR ................................................................................................................................................... 141 Bellgrove v Eldridge (1954) 90 CLR 613 141 Tabcorp Holdings v Bowen Investments (2009) 236 CLR 272 142 Reliance Damages 144 I – GENERAL PRINCIPLES 144 Commonwealth v Amann Aviation (1991) 174 CLR 64 145 Loss of Chance Damages 146 Howe v Teefy (1927) 27 SR (NSW) 301 147 Gains-Based Damages 148 Limits on Damages 148 Causation and Remoteness 148 I – CAUSATION 148 II – REMOTENESS 149 Victoria Laundry (Windsor) Ltd v Newman Industries Ltd [1949] 2 KB 528 ............................................................................................................................................... 150 III – ILLUSTRATIVE CASES 151 Alexander v Cambridge Credit Corp (1987) 9 NSWLR 310 151 Stuart v Condor Commercial Insulation [2006] NSWCA 334 152 Mitigation 153 Burns v MAN Automotive (Aust) (1986) 161 CLR 653 155 Simonious Vischer & Co v Holt & Thompson [1979] 2 NSWLR 322 156 Clark v Macourt (2013) 253 CLR 1 157 Disappointment and Distress 157 Baltic Shipping v Dillon (1993) 176 CLR 344 158 Contributory Negligence 159 Termination under Express Term 159 Shevill v Builders Licensing Board (1982) 149 CLR 620 160 Liquidated Damages 161 The Penalties Doctrine and Terms Providing for Payment (Breach) 161 I – LIQUIDATED DAMAGES AND PENALTIES 161 II – ILLUSTRATIVE CASES 162 Esanda Finance Corp v Plessnig (1989) 166 CLR 131 162 Penalties and Terms Providing for Payment (Not Involving Breach) 163 Andrews v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd (2012) 247 CLR 205 163 t c 165 Requirements of an Action for Debt 165 I – ENTIRE OBLIGATIONS 165 II – DIVISIBLE OBLIGATIONS 165 Steele v Tardiani (1946) 72 CLR 386 165 III – LEGISLATION 166 Nemeth v Bayswater Road Pty Ltd [1988] 2 Qd R 406 166 IV – SUBSTANTIAL PERFORMANCE 167 Hoenig v Isaacs [1952] 2 All ER 176 167 Bolton v Mahdeva [1972] 1 WLR 1009 167 V – PAYMENT INDEPENDENT OF PERFORMANCE 168 McDonald v Dennys Lascelles Ltd (1933) 48 CLR 457 168 Deposits 169 Bot v Ristevski [1981] VR 120 170 Misrepresentation and Rescission 170 Misrepresentation 170 I – OVERVIEW 170 II – MISREPRESENTATION OF FACT 171 Smith v Land & House Property Corp (1884) 28 Ch D 7 171 Fitzpatrick v Michel (1928) 28 SR (NSW) 285 172 Public Trustee v Taylor [1978] VR 289 173 III – POSITIVE MISREPRESENTATION 173 Davies v London & Provincial Marine Insurance Co (1878) 8 Ch D 469 174 McKenzie v McDonald [1927] VLR 134 174 IV – RELIANCE BY THE REPRESENTEE 175 Rescission 175 I – RESTITUTIO IN INTEGRUM 175 Alati v Kruger (1955) 94 CLR 216 175 Brown v Smitt (1924) 34 CLR 160 176 Vadasz v Pioneer Concrete (1995) 184 CLR 102 177 II – BARS TO RESCISSION 178 Watt v Westhoven [1933] VLR 458 178 Coastal Estates v Melevende [1965] VR 433 179 Misleading or Deceptive Conduct 179 Overview 179 The Trade or Commerce Limitation 179 Concrete Constructions (NSW) v Nelson (1990) 169 CLR 594 180 O‟Brien v Smolonogov (1983) 53 ALR 107 181 Houghton v Arms (2006) 225 CLR 553 181 The Relevant Audience 182 ACCC v TPG Internet Pty Ltd (2013) 250 CLR 640 182 Butcher v Lachlan Elder Realty Pty Ltd (2004) 218 CLR 592 182 Misleading Conduct 183 I – SILENCE 183 Mistake 183 Overview 183 I – TERMINOLOGY: TYPES OF MISTAKES 183 II – HOW THE LAW SHOULD RESPOND TO MISTAKE 184 III – REMEDY: RESCISSION V RECTIFICATION 184 Common Mistake 185 I – COMMON LAW: CONSTRUCTIONIST APPROACH 185 McRae v Commonwealth Disposals Commission (1951) 84 CLR 377 185 II – COMMON LAW RESPONSE: IS RELIEF PROVIDED? 186 Bell v Lever Brothers [1932] AC 161 186 III – RESCISSION IN EQUITY 188 Solle v Butcher [1950] 1 KB 671 188 Great Peace Shipping v Tsavliris Salvage (International) [2003] QB 679 189 Svanosio v McNamara (1956) 96 CLR 186 190 Rectification for Common Mistake 190 Maralinga v Major Enterprises (1973) 128 CLR 336 190 Pukallus v Cameron (1982) 180 CLR 447 192 Mutual Mistake 193 Unilateral Mistake as to Terms 193 I – COMMON LAW VOID AND EQUITY (RESCISSION) 193 Smith v Hughes (1871) LR 6 QB 597 193 Taylor v Johnson (1983) 151 CLR 422 194 II – RECTIFICATION 195 Leibler v Air New Zealand (No 2) [1991] 1 VR 1 195 Mistakenly Signed Documents: Non Est Factum 196 Petelin v Cullen (1975) 132 CLR 355 196 Mistake as to Identity 197 I – PARTIES NOT FACE TO FACE 197 II – PARTIES FACE TO FACE 198 Lewis v Averay [1972] 1 QB 198 198 Electronic Transactions 199 Duress 199 I – OVERVIEW 199 II – BASIC ELEMENTS OF DURESS 199 Universe Tankships of Monrovia v International Transport Workers Federation [1983] 1 AC 366 199 III – DURESS AND COERCION OF THE PERSON 200 Barton v Armstrong [1976] AC 104 201 Undue Influence 202 I – OVERVIEW 202 II – CLASSES OF INFLUENCE 202 Johnson v Buttress (1936) 56 CLR 113 202 III – REBUTTING THE PRESUMPTION 204 Westmelton (Vic) v Archer and Schulman [1982] VR 305 204 Unconscionable Dealing 205 I – OVERVIEW 205 II – ELEMENTS OF THE DOCTRINE 205 III – MODERN APPLICATIONS 206 Blomley v Ryan (1956) 99 CLR 362 206 Commercial Bank of Australia v Amadio (1983) 151 CLR 447 207 Louth v Diprose (1992) 175 CLR 621 209 Third Party Impropriety 210 I – THREE PARTY SITUATIONS 210 II – RULE IN YERKEY V JONES 211 Garcia v National Australia Bank (1998) 194 CLR 395 211 Unconscionable conduct under statute 213 I – PART 2-2 OF THE ACL 213 ACCC v CG Berbatis Holdings (2003) 214 CLR 51 214 II – NSW Contracts Review Act 215

Show more Read less
Institution
Course

Content preview

Summary LPC Notes Advanced Commercial Litigation
Revision notes (Distinction) 2022


Summary LPC Notes Advanced
Commercial Litigation
Revision notes (Distinction)
2022

Contents
Logic ......................................................................................................................................... 8
Express Terms – Identification (1) .................................................................................. 8
By Signature ........................................................................................................................... 8
I – THE EFFECT OF SIGNATURE .......................................................................... 8
L‟Estrange v F Graucob Ltd [1934] 2 KB 394 .................................................. 8
II – EXCEPTIONS TO THE SIGNATURE RULE .............................................. 9
Curtis v Chemical Cleaning & Dyeing [1951] 1 KB 805 ............................ 10
Toll (FGCT) v Alphapharm (2004) 219 CLR 165 .........................................11
III – CRITICISM OF THE RULE .........................................................................13
By Notice .......................................................................................................................... 13
I – TIMING .............................................................................................................................. 14
Oceanic Sun Line Special Shipping Company v Fay (1988) 165 CLR 197. 14
II – KNOWLEDGE/NOTICE ........................................................................................ 16
Thornton v Shoe Lane Parking [1971] 2 QB 163 .........................................17
III – UNUSUAL TERMS ........................................................................................... 19
Baltic Shipping Co v Dillon (“The Mikhail Lermontov”) (1991) 22 NSWLR
1 ...................................................................................................................20
By Course of Dealing ................................................................................................... 21
Rinaldi & Patroni v Precision Mouldings (1986) WAR 131 .........................22
Balmain New Ferry v Robertson (1906) 4 CLR 379 ....................................23
Express Terms – Identification (2) ................................................................................ 24
Parol Evidence Rule ..................................................................................................... 24
I – DETERMINING WHETHER A CONTRACT IS WHOLLY WRITTEN. 24
State Rail Authority of NSW v Heath Outdoor (1986) 7 NSWLR 170 .........25
P a g e 1 | 264

,Summary LPC Notes Advanced Commercial Litigation
Revision notes (Distinction) 2022
II – EXCEPTIONS TO THE PAROL EVIDENCE RULE .................................27
Hoyt‟s v Spencer (1919) 27 CLR 133 .................................................................. 28
Saleh v Romanous [2010] NSWCA 274 ......................................................... 29
III – PRE-CONTRACTUAL STATEMENTS......................................................... 31
Equuscorp v Glengallan Investments (2004) 218 CLR 271 ........................33
JJ Savage & Sons v Blakney (1970) 119 CLR 435 .......................................34
Oscar Chess v Williams [1957] 1 WLR 370 .................................................35




P a g e 2 | 264

,Summary LPC Notes Advanced Commercial Litigation
Revision notes (Distinction) 2022
Dick Bentley Productions v Harold Smith (Motors) [1965] 2 All ER 65 ..... 36




P a g e 3 | 264

, Summary LPC Notes Advanced Commercial Litigation
Revision notes (Distinction) 2022
Express Terms – Construction ......................................................................................... 37
Principles of Construction ........................................................................................ 37
Parol Evidence Rule ..................................................................................................... 38
I– SURROUNDING CIRCUMSTANCES ............................................................ 38
Western Export Services v Jireh International [2011] HCA 45 ...................39
Electricity Generation Corporation v Woodside Energy Ltd (2014) 251
CLR 640 ......................................................................................................41
Mount Bruce Mining Pty Ltd v Wright Prospecting Pty Ltd [2015] HCA 37
................................................................................................................................................. 41
II – APPLICATION OF PRINCIPLES ................................................................... 44
Royal Botanic Gardens and Domain Trust v South Sydney City Council
(2002) 240 CLR 45......................................................................................44
Pacific Carriers v BNP Paribas (2004) 218 CLR 451...................................46
Exemption Clauses ............................................................................................................. 48
III – CONTRA PREFERENTUM ............................................................................ 48
Darlington Futures v Delco Aust (1986) 161 CLR 500................................48
IV – NEGLIGENCE ......................................................................................................... 50
Davis v Pearce Parking Station (1954) 91 CLR 642 ....................................50
V – FOUR CORNERS ................................................................................................. 52
Thomas National Transport (Melbourne) Pty Ltd v May & Baker
(Australia) Pty Ltd (1966) 115 CLR 353 ......................................................52
Implied Terms ......................................................................................................................... 53
Implied In Fact ............................................................................................................... 54
Byrne v Australian Airlines; Frew v Australian Airlines (1995) 185 CLR
410 ..............................................................................................................56
Codelfa Construction v State Rail Authority of NSW (1982) 149 CLR 337 59
Implied In Law ............................................................................................................... 61
University of Western Australia v Gray (2009) 179 FCR 346 .....................61
Implied From Custom ................................................................................................. 63
Con-Stan Industries of Aust v Norwich Winterthur Ins (Aust) (1986) 160
CLR 226 ......................................................................................................63
Australian Consumer Law (ACL) ................................................................................ 64
Overview of ACL Provisions .......................................................................................... 64
INTRODUCTION TO ACL ........................................................................................ 64
CHAPTER 2 – GENERAL PROTECTIONS .......................................................... 65
Part 2 – 1: Misleading or Deceptive Conduct (ss 18-19) ......................... 65

P a g e 4 | 264

Written for

Course

Document information

Uploaded on
March 27, 2023
Number of pages
285
Written in
2022/2023
Type
Exam (elaborations)
Contains
Questions & answers

Subjects

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
FLOYYD Walden University
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
237
Member since
5 year
Number of followers
220
Documents
2778
Last sold
3 weeks ago

I’ve been sharing study resources on Stuvia since 2020, helping students around the world succeed in their exams and coursework. My focus is on creating well-structured, accurate, and easy-to-understand documents that save time and boost results. Whether you’re looking for summaries, past paper solutions, test banks, or detailed notes, you’ll find content that is carefully prepared and student-friendly. I value clarity, quality, and reliability—so you can study with confidence. Join the many students who have already benefited from my resources and take your learning to the next level.

Read more Read less
3.6

45 reviews

5
24
4
2
3
6
2
3
1
10

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions