100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Previously searched by you
Previously searched by you
logo
Summary EU Law - Competition Law (Notes & Exam Guidance) CA$9.16   Add to cart
Quickly navigate to
Preview
  2.  
  3. GDL
  4.  
  5. GDL
  6.  
  7. GDL

Summary

Summary EU Law - Competition Law (Notes & Exam Guidance)
 17 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • GDL
  • Institution
  • GDL

These notes cover EU competition law as taught on the EU Law module of postgraduate law conversion courses (the GDL/PGDL). They can also cover topics on introductory EU Law papers taught on UK undergraduate Law degrees (LLBs). As well as notes, this document includes exam plans in the form of fl...

[Show more]

Preview 3 out of 17  pages

Document information

  • July 21, 2023
  • 17
  • 2021/2022
  • Summary

Subjects

  • eu law
  • law
  • gdl
  • pgdl
  • competition law
  • article 101 tfeu
  • article 102 tfeu
  • eu

Written for

  • GDL
  • GDL
  • GDL
All documents for this subject (73)

Seller

avatar-seller
lawnotes08

Reviews received

Content preview

EU Law - Competition Law

PART 1 - Article 102 TFEU: Misuse of Market Power

The role of EU institutions in competition law:

- European Commission:
- Council of the EU delegated power to the Commission to supervise the
operation of comp law
- Responsible for:
- Development of competition policy
- Investigation of suspected infringements
- Taking decisions on most points of comp law
- Taking action against infringers
- Court of Justice of the European Union:
- The General Court
- When a decision has been taken by the Commission in relation to
comp law, that body/undertaking can appeal the decision to the
General court (Article 263 TFEU procedure)
- ECJ
- Further appeals on point of law from the General Court come here
- When a national court seeks a preliminary ruling on a point of EU
Comp Law from the ECJ (Article 267 TFEU procedure)

Abuse of a dominant position - Article 102 TFEU

Key elements of Article 102 TFEU:

1) Existence of a dominant position

- ECJ case law definition of dominance (United Brands):
- A position of economic strength, ‘market power’, which allows an
undertaking to prevent effective competition in the relevant market
- Test of dominance - when an undertaking can behave independently of
both its customers and its competitors




- Test of substitutability - for defining a (separate/unique) product market (as
shown in United Brands):

, - Demand substitutability (greater weight)
- Whether two products are interchangeable/substitutes for
consumers - consider whether a consumer of product A would buy
product B if the price of product A increased
- Confirmed and quantified in Commission Notice on
Definition of the Relevant Market, which lays out the
substitutability test as being whether a small but lasting
increase in the price of a product (5-10%) would result in
customers switching to available substitutes
- The more substitutability there is, the wider the market is, and the
harder it will be to establish dominance
- Supply substitutability
- Whether the supplier of product A could easily begin to supply
product B
- Affected by barriers to entry - start up costs, regulations...

- Geographic market:
- ‘The area in which the undertakings concerned are involved in the supply
and demand of products or services, in which the conditions are
sufficiently homogeneous and which can be distinguished from
neighbouring areas because the conditions of competition are appreciably
different in those areas’
- Applied in United Brands taking into account the following:
- Transportation costs
- If high, producers in a distant geographic area may
not be able to compete effectively as their product
prices will be higher
- Product characteristics
- Can a product be transported easily? Fragility or
perishability could prevent shipment over long
distances
- Shipment patterns
- Where are the products currently being shipped from
and sold?
- Location of manufacturing facilities

- Assessing whether there’s dominance (after defining product and geographic
markets):
- Market share
- Very large market shares are normally evidence of the existence of
a dominant position - Hoffman-La Roche

, - ECJ stated there is a presumption of dominance where market
share is 50% or more- AKZO Chemie
- So the burden of disproving dominance is on the
undertaking. If below 50% market share, the burden of proof
of dominance is on the Commission
- No clear definition of ‘very large’ market share required for
dominance to be established - 40-45% market share was sufficient
for evidence of a dominant position which made entry for new firms
difficult in United Brands
- Important to note the market share of nearest competitors,
only 16% and 10% in United Brands
- Length of time
- Must be in a strong position for a long period of time to establish
dominance
- Barriers to entry
- More barriers to entry (IP, start-up costs…) make dominance more
likely
- Other factors
- Uneven distribution of capital, technological expertise can make
dominance more likely
- High consumer bargaining power (e.g. very few large customers in
the market) makes dominance less likely

- Joint dominance:
- When multiple undertakings hold a dominant position
- Italian Flat Glass
- Facts:
- 3 Italian flat glass producers had independence from
competitive pressures and impeded competition - held a
dominant position
- Held:
- Although Commission’s decision overturned on appeal,
General Court stated there was nothing to prevent multiple
entities from holding a dominant position in a specific market




- Substantial part of the internal market:
- Article 102 TFEU requires an undertaking to be dominant ‘within the
internal market or a substantial part of it’
- Can be geographically small as long as it is economically significant

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller lawnotes08. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for CA$9.16. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

77764 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
CA$9.16
  • (0)
  Add to cart