100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Previously searched by you
Previously searched by you
logo
Summary WJEC criminology unit 3 - crime scene to courtroom AC2.3 CA$5.41   Add to cart
Quickly navigate to
Preview
  2.  
  3. WJEC
  4.  
  5. Criminology
  6.  
  7. Crime Scene to Courtroom (4543U3)

Summary

Summary WJEC criminology unit 3 - crime scene to courtroom AC2.3
 20 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Crime Scene to Courtroom (4543U3)
  • Institution
  • WJEC
  • Book
  • Criminology Book Two

This document includes notes and information about AC2.3 within unit 3 criminology that allowed me to achieve an A grade. Here you will find information about the rules in relation to the use of evidence in criminal investigations. This includes: reliability, relevance and admissibility of evidence...

[Show more]

Preview 1 out of 2  pages

Document information

  • Unknown
  • August 23, 2023
  • 2
  • 2023/2024
  • Summary

Subjects

  • wjec
  • criminology
  • unit 3
  • crime scene to courtroom
  • book 2
  • criminology book 2
  • 11 32
  • controlled assessment
  • ac11
  • ac12
  • ac13
  • ac14
  • ac21
  • ac22
  • ac23
  • ac24
  • ac25
  • ac31
  • ac32
  • crime
  • model answer
  • essay s
  • summary
  • notes

Connected book

book image

Book Title:

Author(s):

  • Edition:
  • ISBN:
  • Edition:

More summaries for

  • Criminology Unit 3 - AC2.3 exam practice
  • Criminology Unit 3 - AC2.4 Asses the key influence affecting the outcomes of the criminal cases
  • Criminology Unit 3 - AC2.5 Discuss the use of lay people
All for this textbook (33)

Written for

  • A/AS Level
  • WJEC
  • Criminology
  • Crime Scene to Courtroom (4543U3)
All documents for this subject (372)

Seller

avatar-seller
zetafeff

Reviews received

Content preview

Criminology unit 3


2.3 Understand rules in relation to the used of evidence in
criminal cases
Relevance and Admissibility of Evidence
When evidence is used within a criminal case to determine whether the defendant is guilty
or innocent. The evidence must fall under certain guidelines and rules. All evidence which is
presented in a court by either the defence or prosecution team must be deemed: reliable,
relevant and admissible.

Relevance and Admissibility of Evidence
Reliability
The reliability of evidence refers to the extent of which evidence is true/accurate and
dependable. In order to help assess the reliability of evidence there are several factors that
must be considered, which is the credibility, authenticity and accuracy of evidence.
The credibility of evidence is the extent to which a reasonable person within the court, such
as a member of the jury, would believe that the evidence presented to them was truthful.
For example, if an eyewitness is called, they should be of good character and not likely to lie
when presenting a testimony. The credibility of evidence will increase if it has been proven
to be accurate, for example, if it has scientific support which was received by expert,
statistics presented may be considered to be more correct/true. In order for evidence to be
classified as authentic it must be genuine or original. For example, a document which is used
as evidence and presented to a jury must not be forged.

Relevance of Evidence in Court
The relevance of evidence in court refers to the difference between facts in issue and
relevant facts
Facts in issue may also be referred to as ‘principal’ facts and are the primary matters which
the court are discussing and must make a decision about. For example, if person A
threatened person B with a knife, the primary matter in question would be if a knife was
actually used to threaten person B.
Relevant facts, are facts which are presented to support the facts in issue and prove or
disprove the arguments made by the prosecution or defence in court. An example of a
relevant fact would be if Person A’s finger prints were in fact found on the knife which was
supposedly used.

Admissibility of Evidence in Court
When presenting evidence within a court only certain types of evidence can be heard. This is
because a defendant has the right to a fair trial. This means that certain kinds of evidence
may be classed as inadmissible. Examples of inadmissible evidence would include that of
which is improperly/illegally obtained. For example, if evidence was obtained through an

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller zetafeff. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for CA$5.41. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

66579 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
CA$5.41
  • (0)
  Add to cart