100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Summary Task 1 - Back to Lombroso? CA$5.28   Add to cart

Summary

Summary Task 1 - Back to Lombroso?

 10 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution

Summary of Task 1 of Neuropsychology & Law

Preview 2 out of 13  pages

  • September 27, 2023
  • 13
  • 2023/2024
  • Summary
avatar-seller
TASK 1: BACK TO LOMBROSO?
NEUROSCIENTIFIC & BEHAVIOURAL GENETIC INFORMATION IN CRIMINAL CASES IN THE
NETHERLANDS (KOGEL & WESTGEEST)

 TBS order – imposed if person is considered not (completely) responsible for their
offense + perceived as a severe danger to others / society
 Neuropsychological methods in criminal cases
 Emphasis often on imaging techniques
o MRI scans – in cases where pre-frontal damage is suspected
 Need of practice oriented instruments & guidelines


HOW WERE THE CASES FOUND? & THEIR CHARACTERISTICS

 Rechtspraak.nl  cases selected with neuroscientific / genetic info with respect to
suspect / defendant
 Neuroscientific information
 Imaging techniques (MRI, TMS, lesion studies) or EEG
 Neuro-endocrinological assessment
 Neuropsychological assessment
 Referring to a certain neurobiological predisposition / damage of the brain
 Characteristics: mainly introduced in cases with serious violent / sexual offense
o Info provided as part of a larger picture about the defendant
 Behavioural genetic information
 Heritability assessment
 Referring to a genetic predisposition / family history that indicates a biological
origin of a behaviour
 Information about suspects were scored by 2 independent investigators
 Different methods used to gain insight into defendant & its mental state: (1)
psychiatric interviews, (2) psychological & neuropsychological tests, (3) collateral
reports, (4) neurological investigation


JUDICIAL QUESTIONS & CASE EXAMPLES

EVIDENCE OF COMMITTING THE CRIME: RELIABILITY OF STATEMENTS

 Often argument is “just mentioned” by defendant, but no further evidence to
collaborate it is introduced

EXAMPLE: woman accused of attempted manslaughter of her partner
 Defendant argument: she was confused during interrogation, due to mild
concussion  false statement

 Court’s decision: this statement not relevant for making judgement about guilt

,  Effect of brain damage on the reliability of statements

EXAMPLE: woman (30s) falls down stairs after quarrel with her boyfriend
 Retrograde amnesia = can’t remember events shortly before fall
 3 years after fall: remembers that boyfriend pushed her down the stairs
 Expert 1: this is plausible

 Expert 2: minutes before the fall never come back into memory – confirmed by a
neuropsychologist

 Role of neuropsychology in law
 Deficits in executive functions
o In populations with severe antisocial behaviour
o Important for self-regulation, the ability to direct one’s behaviour & thinking
o Associated with less optimal development of / damage to pre-frontal brain
 Range of tests used for assessment of brain functioning
o Several norm groups to compare individual scores with  on individual level
this may be better than brain imaging

COMPETENCY TO STAND TRIAL

 Neuroscientific information can support & further strengthen evidence about
impairments

EXAMPLE: defendant had neurocognitive problems due to previous cerebral
haemorrhage & infarction
 Impairments in orientation, attention, language & speech, memory, executive
control functions, visual perception  interfere with defendant’s ability to
understand prosecution against him

INTENT OR GUILT

 Neuroscientific evidence introduced to figure out whether defendant was aware of
committing the crime

EXAMPLE: woman allegedly shot someone at 2:30am
 Cannot remember anything after going to sleep at 2am – acted while sleepwalking

 Psycho-physiological sleep assessment  confirms what woman was saying

 Violence during sleep
 Researchers have worked on a protocol to offer guidelines to experts in court
 Guidelines (1) indicate ways to diagnose different sleep disorders, (2) offer ways to
recognise whether behaviour matches a sleep disorder or not, (3) helps to
differentiate truth from simulation

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller emma2296. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for CA$5.28. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

67096 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
CA$5.28
  • (0)
  Add to cart