100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Previously searched by you
Previously searched by you
logo
Summary Flashcards for 'reason as a source of knowledge' Module for Epistemolgy topic of A level Philosophy AQA. CA$10.22   Add to cart
Quickly navigate to
Preview
  2.  
  3. AQA
  4.  
  5. Philosophy

Summary

Summary Flashcards for 'reason as a source of knowledge' Module for Epistemolgy topic of A level Philosophy AQA.

 16 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution
  • AQA
  • Book
  • AQA A-level Philosophy Year 1 and AS

Flashcards for 'reason as a source of knowledge' Module for Epistemolgy topic of A level Philosophy AQA. From an A* student. Can also provide access to quizlet flashcards if asked.

Preview 3 out of 17  pages

Document information

  • Yes
  • October 29, 2023
  • 17
  • 2023/2024
  • Summary

Subjects

  • leibniz
  • rationalists
  • epiricism
  • rationalism
  • innatism
  • innatists
  • philosophy
  • flashcards
  • locke
  • descartes
  • three waves of doubt
  • aqa a level philosophy
  • reason as a source of knowledge

Connected book

book image

Book Title:

Author(s):

  • Edition:
  • ISBN:
  • Edition:

More summaries for

  • Is Aristotle's Virtue Theory an accurate account of morality? (25)
  • Assess Kant's Deontological Ethics - 25 Marks
  • Flashcards for 'limits of knowledge' Module for Epistemolgy topic of A level Philosophy AQA.
All for this textbook (13)

Written for

  • A/AS Level
  • AQA
  • Philosophy
  • Unknown

Seller

avatar-seller
miaapfel

Reviews received

Content preview

Reason as a source of knowledge
Study online at https://quizlet.com/_d4j29w

1. What is in- The claim that we are born with some innate knowledge
natism? which doesn't require experience to be known. Rather, it is
often revealed through reason. This knowledge is a priori.

2. What is rational- The claim that there are significant truths about the world
ism? that we can determine via means other than experience
or empirical evidence. This is because our senses are too
deceptive and fallible to be meaningful sources of knowl-
edge. Rather, we can acquire knowledge purely through
reason, intuition and deduction (i.e. we can acquire knowl-
edge purely by thinking rather than through perceptual
experience.)

3. What is a priori Knowledge that can be acquired without experience of the
knowledge? external world, through thought alone. e.g. mathematical
truths like 2 + 3 = 5

4. What is a posteri- Knowledge that can only be acquired from experience of
ori knowledge? the external world. E.G. Any knowledge we gain via our
senses (via empirical evidence), such as 'that apple is
mouldy'.

5. How did Plato Plato uses the example of Meno's slave. In this example,
prove his theory? Socrates calls over a slave, who, despite never being
taught geometry, knows a geometry proof that a square
with an area of 2A will have sides equal to the diagonal of
a square with an area of 1A. Socrates only asks questions;
he does not teach the boy about squares. However, even
though the boy has no prior experience of geometry, he
is able to correctly answer Socrates' questions (or at least
correct his mistakes).

6. What was Pla- The boy was not learning from Socrates' words, but rather
to trying to say the questioning was helping the boy to recall knowledge
about knowledge that was in him 'innately'. All learning is a form of recalling
in the example knowledge from before we are born - we are born with
of Meno's slave innate knowledge but we just need to remember it. Since
boy? Meno's slave had no experience of geometry, his correct




, Reason as a source of knowledge
Study online at https://quizlet.com/_d4j29w
knowledge (i.e. eternal truth) must have existed innately in
him to begin with.

7. What is an issue This example does not show that knowledge exists in us
with Plato's ar- as a type of forgotten memory. Perhaps the slave boy
gument from the is simply using reason to work out what must be the
'slave boy'? case given certain features of lines and shapes. It is not
necessary to posit innate knowledge to explain how the
boy can reason his way to the discovery of geometric truth.

8. What is Plato's Plato was puzzled by the problem of universals: of the
theory of forms? relationship between a concept and individual instances of
that concept. For example, we seem to have a concept of
beauty, but never witness beauty in its pure form, only im-
perfectly in different people and objects. Plato claimed that
in a prior existence, we apprehended perfect concepts or
'forms' in their pure state. We have forgotten most of these
forms, but they are in us innately. Through reasoning we
can achieve a perfect understanding/apprehension once
again.

9. How does Plato's Innate ideas are 'in' us, although we might not be aware
theory of forms of them (like a forgotten memory is 'in' us). We can realise
show features of these innate ideas through reason. Innate ideas prove
innatism? timeless truths.

10. What counts as Mathematical objects, such as numbers and shapes. Ab-
innate ideas for stract concepts such as justice and beauty.
Plato?

11. What was Leib- He believed that the human mind could gain knowledge
niz's argument of the world through reason alone (though prompted by
about innatism? the senses). According to his theory, it is our knowledge
of necessary truths that must be innate.

12. Explain the A necessary truth is what must always be the case, where-
difference be- as a contingent truth is what is the case. Whilst a neces-
tween necessary sary truth is true in every possible world, contingent truth
and contingent could have been false in some other possible world. For
truths. example, "Paris is the capital of France" is a contingent


, Reason as a source of knowledge
Study online at https://quizlet.com/_d4j29w
truth because they could have chosen to make Lyon or
some other city the capital instead. Whereas, "2+2=4"
is a necessary truth because there is no possible world
where "2+2" equals 7 or some other number than 4. The
'necessity' of this truth cannot be revealed by the senses,
but only by reason - which is the application of principles
that innately inside us.

13. What is Leibniz's Leibniz argues that our knowledge of necessary truths
argument from must be innate. He claims that the senses only reveal
the necessity of instances of general truths. A collection of instances can
truth? never reveal the necessity of a general truth. However, our
minds can grasp the necessity of some general truths. The
'necessity' of a truth cannot be revealed by the senses, but
only by reason - which is the application of principles that
are innately inside us.

14. Example for Leib- "2+2=4" is a necessary truth because there is no possible
niz's argument world where "2+2" equals 7 or some other number than
from the necessi- 4. A posteriori experience can tell us that adding these
ty of truth. 2 apples to these 2 two apples gives us 4 apples. But
no amount of experience can tell us how things must be
(because even if you add apples 100000 times, you never
know what will happen the 100001st time). And yet we
do know that it must always be true that "2+2=4". We
know that there will never be an instance where you add 2
apples to 2 apples and get 5 apples because "2+2=4" is a
necessary truth. This knowledge can't come from experi-
ence, though, because experience only tells us how things
are, not how they must be. In other words, experience can
only tell us what is true, not what is necessarily true.

15. What counts as truths of mathematics; logical principles such as the law of
innate ideas for non-contradiction; the concept of identity. Also, concepts
Leibniz? derived from our awareness of ourselves, such as unity,
change, pleasure.

16. What is Leibniz's Leibniz did not claim that innate principles exist within us
analogy of the fully formed from birth. Our mind is like a block of marble
block of marble? which has veins running through it in such a way that it

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller miaapfel. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for CA$10.22. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

76449 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling

Recently viewed by you

Exam (elaborations) ·

(0)

Security+ Cert Exam Objectives SYO-601 with complete solution graded A+

Package deal ·

(0)

WGU C921 YNM1 Task 1,2 and 3 Bundled with complete solutions

CA$10.22
  • (0)
  Add to cart