100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
BIOLOGICAL AND COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY: all lecture notes summarized (including pictures and examples) CA$12.47   Add to cart

Class notes

BIOLOGICAL AND COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY: all lecture notes summarized (including pictures and examples)

 116 views  6 purchases
  • Course
  • Institution
  • Book

This document contains all lecture notes for the course: BIOLOGICAL AND COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY. I listened to all the lectures one by one and transcribed them in full detail (including images and examples for clarification). This really contains everything you need to know for the exam! *With my ...

[Show more]

Preview 4 out of 117  pages

  • November 23, 2023
  • 117
  • 2023/2024
  • Class notes
  • Dr. dennis van 't ent & dr. richard godijn
  • All classes
avatar-seller
Bio Cog hoorcollege 1 31-10-2022

Biological and cognitive psychology very strong related
But, also are very different:

Cognitive psychology
• Study of the mental processes of the mind
- Functional explanations; process models
- Looking at how do these processes interact

Biological psychology
• Study of the biological basis of the mind
- Focus on brain processes; structural models
- Looking at how these brain areas interact

Fortunately, we have an interaction/integration: Cognitive Neuroscience
All the interactions between these mental processes and between these brain regions
So, biological and cognitive psychology are not that different → they’re just different
perspectives of more or less the same thing (human mind/human behavior)

This integration is very young science (since 1990s) because of:
- In the past: long-time dominance of body-mind dualism (body and mind apart)
Now: more monism (the mind is what the brain does)
- Also, hard to study mental processes in brain, so technical developments help: fMRI
(brain imaging to examine where mental processes occur in the brain)

• History 19th century:
Cognitive psychology really got started in 1950s, but there are some predecessors → they
weren’t psychologist (because not yet a field of study at that time), but they were typically
physiologists, physicians etc.

- 1860: Weber / Fechner
• They developed psychophysics: focusses on perception by manipulating the stimulus
• So, they look at relation between physical energy to sensation

- 1867: Hermann von Helmholtz examined how individuals subjectively interpret outside
world → he sees perception as processes of unconscious inferences about the world

- 1879: Wundt opened first psychology lab

• Physiological chronometry
Chronometry: the timing (of biological or mental processes) → can be measured: by
measuring the speed of nerve conduction

- Johannes Müller thought that the speed of nerve conduction is infinitely fast (not true)
Came up with spiritual ‘lebenskraft’: suggesting a spiritual/mental force that guides
biological processes → already kind of interaction between mental and biological aspect

- Von Helmholtz: was able to measure this nerve conduction velocity → 60 m/s (human)

Physiological chronometry paves the way for mental chronometry

,• Mental chronometry
- Donders: idea after Helmholtz’ discovery that nerve conduction velocity is not infinite
→ If nerve conduction takes time, mental processes also take time
So key points:
• Mental processes take time
• We can measure that time (but how do you do that?)

Measuring by Donders’s subtraction method
Goal: estimate the duration of a mental process (X) → so measuring the time to answer

Method:
• Create two identical tasks, except for involvement of X
(One task involves X and the other task doesn’t involve X)
• Measure RT (reaction time) in both tasks
• Subtract RTs
→ gives us duration of X

Simple RT task



Response: always (alien Anthony and alien Al)

Go / No-go task



Response: only to one color (only alien
Anthony, not Al)

→ RT (go/no-go) – RT (simple) = stimulus
discrimination time

Problems:
▪ Depends on assumptions about stages
▪ Strong assumption about stages being independent

• Proceeding of history 19th century:

- 1885: Ebbinghaus’ memory research
Procedure
• Study phase: learn a list of nonsense words (DAX,
ZUG, YOP etc.) to perfection
→ register the time this takes
• Wait a certain time (minutes, days, several days)
• Test phase: register how long it takes to relearn
the list (less time to relearn)
• Calculate percentage of savings

All these examples are mental: researchers were studying perception, memory, time taking
for tests etc. → all processes that are going on in the mind
That quickly changed in 20th century (from 1913 onwards)

,• Era of behaviorism
John Watson (1913): ‘behavior manifesto’
- Completely ignore the mind (mental processes) and just study behavior
- Stimulus Response psychology (S-R psychology)
- Focus on learning

- Two dominant paradigma:
• Classical conditioning (Pavlov) → conditioned reflex
• Operant conditioning (Skinner) → reinforcement learning

- Conditioning is really important for psychology (it’s the basis of certain forms of behavior
and memory)
• Research tradition still kicking and alive
• BUT not as extreme as behaviorism → the interpretation has changed, so
behaviorism that’s still alive is known as: S – O – R (stimulus, organism, response)
We study stimuli and response, but now also what’s going on inside organism

• Towards a cognitive interpretation
Edward Tolman → he discovered that there’s something in the mind that we need to take
into consideration when developing models (not enough to focus on stimuli and responses)




It’s possible to train rat to move to the right for food
Behaviorist would say: rat learned to act/move to right to get to the food
→ But if food is on the left, it would still turn right, so it wouldn’t get the food

Tolman discovered that rats were good at it and suddenly move to the left (where food is)
So, what rat learns is:
- Not a behavioral response (hard to explain purely through behaviorism)
- BUT suggests that the rats have learned a ‘cognitive map’ of environment that leads the
rat to right location → S – O – R

• Cognitive Psychology
Core: human as information processor

Invention of Personal Computer also important
→ compare internal processing of computers
to human processing

, - Measuring ‘central processer’ speed
→ Scanning short-term memory
Sternberg: Memorize letters and tell if they’re present in a stream of
letters (the more letters to remember, the longer it takes to remember)

- The brain: from S to R
Arrow points to right:
→ first perception: info from the retina (via
thalamus) to occipital lobe
→ then info through: dorsal (actions: ‘where/how’) and ventral
(concepts: ‘what’) route
→ then make a decision, so 2information is passed on further to front
of brain: interaction with behavioral goals & motivations (frontal)
→ info sent back to primary motor cortex
→ info from primary motor cortex to → spinal cord
→ response




• The brain: How do we know what and where things happen?

Different methods:
- Neuropsychological studies with patients with brain damage (strokes, accidents)
• Single association:
One group of patients with the same damage (patients have disassociation with
control group)

• Double dissociation:
Two groups of patients (one group damaged A, not B / other damaged B, not A)
Evidence for localization of function: function A and B served by different brain areas
Example: Broca examined a stroke patient with normal speech understanding, but
with deficient speech production
Wernicke examined a stroke patient with fluent speech production, but with
deficient speech understanding

- Brain imaging techniques to record activity on the scalp
• EEG
Electrodes register electrical activity on the scalp, as produced by the brain
• MEG
Similar to EEG, but it registers magnetic activity produced by the brain
Both ‘direct measurements’ of neural activity

• PET
• fMRI
Principle: Active brain areas attract blood
Oxygen reduction in hemoglobin → change in magnetic properties
fMRI detectors pick up the changing magnetic properties
Both ‘indirect measurements’ of neural activity

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller emaass123. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for CA$12.47. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

81989 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
CA$12.47  6x  sold
  • (0)
  Add to cart