100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Previously searched by you
Previously searched by you
logo
LJU4801 EXAM PACK 2024 CA$3.99   Add to cart
Quickly navigate to
Preview
  2.  
  3. University Of South Africa (Unisa)
  4.  
  5. (LJU4801)

Exam (elaborations)

LJU4801 EXAM PACK 2024

3 reviews
 287 views  29 purchases
  • Course
  • (LJU4801)
  • Institution
  • University Of South Africa (Unisa)
  • Book
  • An Introduction to African Legal Philosophy

LJU4801 Latest exam pack questions and answers and summarized notes for exam preparation. Updated for 2024 exams . For assistance Whats-App.0.6.7..1.7.1..1.7.3.9 . All the best on your exams!!

Preview 4 out of 120  pages

Document information

  • December 5, 2023
  • 120
  • 2023/2024
  • Exam (elaborations)
  • Questions & answers

Subjects

  • lju4801

Connected book

book image

Book Title:

Author(s):

  • Edition:
  • ISBN:
  • Edition:

More summaries for

  • LJU4801 OCTOBER NOVEMBER PORTFOLIO (COMPLETE ANSWERS) Semester 2 2024
  • LJU4801 OCTOBER NOVEMBER PORTFOLIO (COMPLETE ANSWERS) Semester 2 2024 -
  • LJU4801 OCTOBER NOVEMBER PORTFOLIO (COMPLETE ANSWERS) Semester 2 2024
All for this textbook (78)

Written for

  • University of South Africa (Unisa)
  • (LJU4801)

3  reviews

review-writer-avatar

By: lungacele • 1 month ago

review-writer-avatar

By: mujovosuzan • 6 months ago

review-writer-avatar

By: bozosiyambulela • 6 months ago

Seller

avatar-seller
iStudy

Reviews received

Content preview

LJU4801
EXAM PACK




FOR ASSISTANCE WITH THIS MODULE +27 67 171 1739

, LJU4801 October/November 2023




UNIVERSITY EXAMINATIONS




October/November 2023
LJU4801

LEGAL PHILOSOPHY


First examiner: Adv RB Mokomane
Second examiner: Ms PAN Nyawo


This paper consists of 4 pages.
The paper counts 100 marks.
The portfolio runs from 20 – 25 October 2023



PLEASE READ THE FOLLOWING INSTRUCTIONS CAREFULLY BEFORE
ANSWERING THE EXAMINATION QUESTIONS.



1. This portfolio must be submitted before 23:00 on 25 October 2023. Students have
to submit this portfolio via myUnisa, therefore no e-mailed or faxed portfolios may
be accepted. No extensions will be granted. It is the responsibility of the student to
ensure that the file submitted is not corrupted and can be opened for marking.
2. You must submit this portfolio as Assessment 3 via myUnisa. When you receive
the portfolio, check whether your submission is open / available and let your
lecturers know immediately if your submission portal is not open.
3. The Declaration of Academic Honesty must be signed and included in the
submission of the portfolio examination.
4. Proper footnote referencing must be used. This entails that every argument or idea
taken from another source, or any piece of information utilised from another source,
needs to be provided with a separate footnote reference.
5. Long quotes from sources are not allowed. Students must summarise or paraphrase
arguments and ideas from sources in their own words. Short quotes must be
provided with quotation marks and with a corresponding footnote.
6. When answering questions, students are expected to make use of the study guide
as well as any other relevant source to answer the question. The study guide must
be referenced like any other source. These footnotes must adhere to the prescribed

1

, LJU4801 October/November 2023


referencing style of the School of Law. In this regard, please read tutorial letter 301,
which is available under official study material on Moodle. Remember that a Unisa
study guide is referenced in the same way as a book. Please include references
in your portfolio, even when you are only referring to the study material and the
Constitution.


7. Use proper language and grammar and make use of full sentences. You must not
write using bullets and numbering. Rather provide a narrative consisting of a
coherent, logical, and consistent argument.




Question 1
Read the following scenario and answer the questions set out below:


In 2011 the Constitutional Court heard the case of The Citizen 1978 (Pty) Ltd and Others v
McBride (CCT 23/10) 2011 (4) SA 191 (CC). This was a defamation case brought by Robert
McBride against the Citizen newspaper. He alleged that they had defamed him. The
newspaper believed that the comments were covered by freedom of expression. In the
course of his minority Judgment, Mogoeng J made the following remarks:
“[217] Botho or ubuntu is the embodiment of a set of values and moral principles which
informed the peaceful co-existence of the African people in this country who espoused
ubuntu based on, among other things, mutual respect.”

AND

“[243] Indeed, human dignity must colour the spectacles through which we view defamatory
publications, particularly those which are inextricably linked to our painful past. And so
should our rich values, like ubuntu, which are consistent with the Constitution, our shameful
history of institutionalised human rights violations, our commitment to make a decisive break
with this past as well as our pursuit of the noble objectives of national unity and reconciliation
also inform the interpretation and exercise of the rights to dignity, freedom of expression,
privacy and property in this country.”


1.1 In the first paragraph ubuntu is characterised as typically African. Write a brief essay
in which you explain what ubuntu means and indicate whether you think the judge is
right in his characterisation of ubuntu. Your answer should not exceed 750 words.
(15)
1.2 In the second paragraph the Judge links ubuntu to human rights. Human rights can be
regarded as something uniquely associated with modern legal philosophy. This is
because of the individualistic nature of human rights. Given that ubuntu is a pre-
modern idea, in your discussion indicate whether you think the judge is correct in
linking ubuntu to human rights. Your answer should not exceed 750 words.
(15)
[30]

2

, LJU4801 October/November 2023


Question 2
2.1 African legal philosophy is based on the premise that there is a uniquely African
approach to law and legal conflicts. Discuss two characteristics of this approach to
illustrate how it is different from Western ideas. Your answer should not exceed 750
words. (15)
2.2 In South Africa the law allows men to enter into polygamous customary marriages.
Women on the other hand are not permitted to have more than one husband. Based
on the feminist legal philosophy (critical gender theory), does the fact that polygamy is
legally recognised, and polyandry not explicitly legally recognised constitute unfair
discrimination against women? In your discussion, refer to Mackinnon’s theory of
dominance feminism. Your answer should not exceed 750 words. (15)


[30]
Question 3
Read the following scenario and then answer the question set out below:

In 2015, the Constitutional Court handed down a judgment in the case of DE v RH [2015]
ZACC 18. In this case, the appellant (Mr DE) challenged the decision by the Supreme of
Court Appeal to abolish the delictual claim against a third party based on adultery. A
concurring judgment by Mogoeng CJ (Cameron J concurring) emphasised that:

“[69] The law does and can only create a regulatory framework for the conclusion of
marriage and the enforcement of obligations that flow from it. It can also help ensure that
barriers to family life are removed. The rest is in the hands of the parties to the marriage.
Barring exceptions, they decide freely to get married and it is within their ability to protect
their marriage from disintegrating.”

AND

“[70] …. marriage essentially hinges on the ‘readiness, founded in morals, of the parties to
the marriage to create and to maintain it’. Like the Supreme Court of Appeal, I also believe
that parties’ loss of moral commitment to sustain marriage may lead to its failure. For abuse
of one by the other and other factors that could lead to the breakdown of marriage are, in
my view, likely to creep in when that commitment ceases to exist.

THEREFORE

“[71] The law cannot shore up or sustain an otherwise ailing marriage. It continues to be the
primary responsibility of the parties to maintain their marriage. For this reason, the continued
existence of a claim for damages for adultery by the “innocent spouse” adds nothing to the
lifeblood of a solid and peaceful marriage.”



3.1 Indicate which philosophical approach the judgment followed and discuss what it
entails. Your answer should not exceed 750 words. (15)
[15]




3

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller iStudy. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for CA$3.99. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

62491 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
CA$3.99  29x  sold
  • (3)
  Add to cart