100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Previously searched by you
Previously searched by you
logo
POLI 203 Midterm Exam Notes – Comparative Politics Concordia University winter 2024 CA$15.86   Add to cart
Quickly navigate to
Preview
  2.  
  3. Concordia University ( )
  4.  
  5. POLI 203

Exam (elaborations)

POLI 203 Midterm Exam Notes – Comparative Politics Concordia University winter 2024
 15 views  0 purchase

POLI 203 Midterm Exam Notes – Comparative Politics Concordia University winter 2024

Preview 3 out of 17  pages

Document information

  • December 20, 2023
  • 17
  • 2023/2024
  • Exam (elaborations)
  • Questions & answers

Subjects

  • poli 203 midterm exam notes

Written for

All documents for this subject (4)

Seller

avatar-seller
smartzone

Reviews received

Content preview

POLI 203 Midterm Exam Notes – Comparative Politics
Concordia University winter 2024



• Aristotle: first one to do comparative politics

Forms of Ruler:

Rules on behalf of MANY: Rules on behalf of HIMSELF:
Individual Monarchy Individual Tyranny
Majority Polity Majority Democracy
Few Aristocracy Few Oligarchy

Democracy: Regime by all population: allows for political/civic liberties
Anocracy: Regime that have some features of democracy but not all
Autocracy: Regime of one person with absolute power

Comparative Politics: The subfield of political science that aims to analyze multiple cases
using the comparative method
Aim (comparative method) : develop claims about cause and effect by testing different
hypotheses
• Answers to 5 W’s: who/where/when/why/what
• Comparativism is meant to answer why things are the way they are in the first place

Empirical Argument:
• Drawn from observations of the world
• arguments that link cause and effect
• Answers to why the political world works as it does
• Empirical evidence: to have proper evidence, the facts need to prove your point
Empirical Theory: About factors and variable that cause things to happen

Normative Argument:
• Looks at which institutions/ practices are ethically correct
• Emphasizes the way things should be
Normative Theory: Questions of moral belief

The Four Freedoms (Rockwell):

Concepts:
• Used to understand the world around us
• Good concepts have:
1- Clarity
2- Coherence
3- Consistency
4- Usefulness

,Conceptualization: deliberate process through which we create/ select social-scientific concepts

, • Needs to be: clear, consistent and useful

Sartori’s ladder of abstraction: ladder from most specific questions to least
- ex: freedom is not a specific term

Operationalization: Process through which we make a concept measurable
• When a concept is clear, we need to measure it

Level of Analysis: Level at which observations are made, or at which causal processes operate
• Ex: If you want evidence about gender attitudes in Saudi Arabia, you are not going
toclaim only what a small group of men think

Case: In comparative analysis; a unit or example of a phenomenon to be
studiedEx: unit can be a country

Variables: Factor that is likely to change, or vary from case to case
• Outcome = effect: something that is produced or changed in any social/ political process

Cause Effect
Independent Variable (X) Dependent Variable (Y)
Explanatory Variable Outcome

• When comparing two or more cases to make an argument, we look at similarities/
differencesbetween cases (variations)

Variations: difference between cases in studies of comparative politics
Ways to find difference between variations:

1- Most-Similar- Systems (MSS): Compare cases with many similarities and analyze the
differences
2- Most-Different-Systems (MDS): Used by comparing two cases that have many
differences and one must analyze its similarities
- Ex: The “method of difference” (J.S. Mill): If 2 instances of the same phenomenonhave
1 circumstance in common – this circumstance is the cause of the phenomenon

Comparative Checking: Testing conclusions from a set of comparisons against additional cases
or evidence
• MDS + MMS may not be reliable for everything

Generalizability: Quality that a given theory, hypothesis or finding has of being applicable to a
wide number of cases

Within-Case-Comparison: Comparative analysis of variation that takes place over time or in
distinct parts of a single case
- Looking more carefully within one case to examine the variations

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller smartzone. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for CA$15.86. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

75057 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
CA$15.86
  • (0)
  Add to cart